查看完整版本: 新人report~~浴潮流

新人report~~浴潮流

一大清早俾佬細叫左入"剷"房剷左一輪，剷後為有call 班老死出黎舒解?我抑鬱?情緒。
相約起佐敦翠X等，同班友一路食一路up，情緒當堂好翻好多，點知有條友話去搵囡囡，當堂全身?血都集中到同一個地方思想。

之後埋單搵地方，點知一去門口就接到傳單，正正就係斜對面地庫，諗住未去過，咪上囉，正當決定之際，班友又話要翻工又剩，最後得我一個"熱血青年"..........



落到下面見到個肥肥馬蘭勞，由locker、沖涼、休憩室全程都係佢一腳踢，見到裡面冇咩客，之後有個姐仔問我飲咩，跟住介紹陀地個我，我問點解冇客，佢話新場。

入到房，好乾淨，ok大，之後有個廿到尾?囡囡入黎，樣子身材都ok。

part 1, 都係果d啦(不過又睇唔出佢咁夠力)。

part 2, 個囡囡問我想要咩，但我又唔想陏，食個機餐算喇。

rpp舒服、"lei ching"high、手刀界屎眼絕，差d爆漿......。

轉身hj正.....



全程個囡囡都好好傾，之後我問佢傳單上標$390係咩意思，佢話呢度有單鐘做，雙鐘就$588.....



總結呢個場都ok啦，可能比佬細插完，比佢r都鬆晒卦。

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

謝謝報告, 尼間即原來佐敦新世界.

[quote]原帖由 [i]白貓兒[/i] 於 2007-7-28 04:37 發表
謝謝報告, 尼間即原來佐敦新世界. [/quote]
聽講過，不過未去過。

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

chinabb1699, 你尼個係轉貼之前新世界桑拿報告.

至於你話人係網站ad 寫手, 我過兩日會同你計. :soldier:

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

好,  你又自招滅亡. :wave:

[[i] 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-29 03:21 編輯 [/i]]

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

又係度撩事鬥飛:saujai:

[[i] 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-29 04:02 編輯 [/i]]

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

以上禁止訪問者是說粗囗罵人.:soldier:

多謝ching嘅精彩報告，但係近600嘅機餐都幾貴，如果開大咪！！！

C Hing, could u tell me this bg No, and this suana place has only hj plan?

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

Thanks your report!!

[quote]原帖由 [i]Zenden[/i] 於 2007-7-30 00:31 發表



china bb,你會唔會1去到16999999999999999999999?;P [/quote]


;P 有都唔奇!! ;P

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

[quote]原帖由 [i]豆仔[/i] 於 2007-7-28 02:14 發表
一大清早俾佬細叫左入"剷"房剷左一輪，剷後為有call 班老死出黎舒解?我抑鬱?情緒。... [/quote]
AD??:o:wondering::oh::jaw:

[quote]原帖由 [i]peninsula[/i] 於 2007-8-2 21:57 發表

AD??:o:wondering::oh::jaw: [/quote]

I can't tell. Actually there's no knowing if this report is a genuine user report or an ad by a hired writer (Please note that I am not passing judgement, accusing or condemning the member who wrote this report).

In the absence of concrete evidence pointing to an ad, members here are always still free to cast/express doubts on a report no matter how dubious it is. However, as board master I would like members to do so with restraint so that overall harmony is maintained. If the reporting member is indeed a genuine sauna visitor and not paid to report here, and it is just that his writing style is interestingly like an ad, our caution in expressing doubt can prevent us from antagonising that member. After all we can always ask the 'dubious' reporting member questions for more information before making our individual judgements. To sum up, while a board master has to get rid of 'proven' ad reports, if concrete evidence against a dubious eport is absent, the reporting member still has the benefit of doubt. He may be subject to other members' queries or criticisms but his report can remain.
The forum rule against advertising does not
empower the board master to ban a member merely because he is dubious but without evidence against him. This is a fair interpretation of that rule.

However, if anyone explicitly accuses the reporting member to be a staff/in-house ad writer from the sauna in question or from an advertising agency such as man169 but does not give any evidence, this is to be discouraged as it could directly initiate argument.
A milder expression of doubt, such as that by you, brother peninsula,  may be more easily tolerated by the reporting member, especially if he is indeed a genuine user rather than an ad writer.

[[i] 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-8-2 22:40 編輯 [/i]]

I accept AD if it is telling the fact.
Once I found the place not as described, I would blacklist the place and not go for the second time.
This place is an open forum for us sharing our experience and have fun.

[quote]原帖由 [i]白貓兒[/i] 於 2007-8-2 22:29 發表
I can't tell. Actually there's no knowing if this report is a genuine user report ... [/quote]
Thanks for your comments.:):lol:beer:

最近有c兄在此有很多報告wor....

I think E +開大 arround over 1K

此場開大不用1千,只要$5乂乂!