phmanjj 2007-8-3 00:02
古惑天王BT侵權疑問
各位c hing, 早排古惑天王BT侵權單野, 海狗係查ip上門拉人, 我想問, 如果該ip的地址中有多過一個人住, 例如古惑天王連同A, B, C三人同住, 而佢地又係share同一部電腦, 咁請問拉邊個?
忽然一Q 2007-8-4 01:45
They will get all 3 and then separate them and take record of interview from each of them.
If they say nothing. Neither admit nor deny, there will not be much evidence.
phmanjj 2007-8-4 23:44
照計如果個個都唔認數咁真係咬佢食喎
古惑天王單野, 佢係一個人住的嗎?
忽然一Q 2007-8-5 01:43
[quote]原帖由 [i]phmanjj[/i] 於 2007-8-4 23:44 發表
照計如果個個都唔認數咁真係咬佢食喎
古惑天王單野, 佢係一個人住的嗎? [/quote]
佢係想同政府打 law point.
而佢亦有可能係特登走出嚟做一單 precedent case.
phmanjj 2007-8-5 23:20
[quote]原帖由 [i]忽然一Q[/i] 於 2007-8-5 01:43 發表
佢係想同政府打 law point.
而佢亦有可能係特登走出嚟做一單 precedent case. [/quote]
sorry, 小弟對法律認識不多, 請問乜野叫"打 law point"?
你話佢登走出嚟做一單 precedent case, 你意思係政府想做? 但係都要冇疑點先得架? 唔係咩?
忽然一Q 2007-8-6 01:00
"打 law point" 即係 legal argument。 For example, if the law says it is unlawful to smoke in a restaurant, but you carry a lighted cigarette in a restaurant and no one sees you smoke it, will you be liable for an offence?
你話佢登走出嚟做一單 precedent case, 你意思係政府想做? 但係都要冇疑點先得架? 唔係咩? ---> 佢都認佢用ＢＴ upload, 咁重有乜疑點？
phmanjj 2007-8-6 09:40
其實咁多辯護理由, 點解佢要認? 佢個律師冇幫佢嗎?
忽然一Q 2007-8-6 20:53
[quote]原帖由 [i]phmanjj[/i] 於 2007-8-6 09:40 發表
其實咁多辯護理由, 點解佢要認? 佢個律師冇幫佢嗎? [/quote]
That's why "而佢亦有可能係特登走出嚟做一單 precedent case. "
phmanjj 2007-8-8 20:37
[quote]原帖由 [i]忽然一Q[/i] 於 2007-8-6 20:53 發表
That's why "而佢亦有可能係特登走出嚟做一單 precedent case. " [/quote]
唔係化? 特登認罪咁偉大?