查看完整版本: 殲十出了未？

殲十出了未？

聽說日本的海上力量僅交於美國，不知空軍又會怎樣？殲十系唔系好勁架？

與美製F-16C/D相約:reading:

空战能力或许与F16有一拼，但对地、对海攻击能力不如

設計上應該會比F-16先進，畢竟F-16都服役了一定年期了

但電子配備就難講了...老美的技術可是領先我們好多

矸-10出左好耐啦喎........舊年12月定今年一月已經係電視上公開左...

正式服役時間可以更早....而家大概都去到70-90架裝備緊啦....

矸-10話好勁又唔算, 同f-22, F-35, 歐洲台風果0的就沒得比既...但比台灣, 日本既現役機都要好0的甘啦..

而最重要既係矸-10係新機, 預留好多空間改進, 仲有好大既進步空間, 例如上面有人講既較弱既對地攻擊能力.....

而且, 只要最後自研引擎搞掂埋後, 矸-10就係最國產既第三代戰機, 想整幾多架就幾多架...!!

But I think J-10 is the besty plan for China

i think J-10 is better then F16

矸-10比早期既F-16 A/B 好, 但未必及得上最新既F-16 I ..等.....

继续增加军费，大力发展军事力量。

J-10 is still miles away from "existing US version" of F-16
In today's engagement, shoot first with first missle lock is the key.
Current US F-16's "look down" radar can lock 8 targets 160 nm away.

We will hardly see any top-gun type of dog fight in moden war.
It is all BVR engagement (beyond visual range)

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

<<<Current US F-16's "look down" radar can lock 8 targets 160 nm away.>>>

你想講公里KM, 還是海哩NM???  160NM 海哩等於約300公里KM.... 好似只有預警機先有甘遠偵測距離....小型機既F-16, 邊有可能??? 仲要係下視添....!??

May be km.
What I was told is the new "look-down" radar is twice the range of the AMRAAM, which is 80 (nm/km???)

BTW, I am sure the AWACS radar range is a lot more than 120nm/300km.  I remember one of the NATO report said 3 AWACS can cover the entire europe battlefield.  It sounds like 1200km to me.

The older (but still personally I believe still one of the best) Pheonix system on the F14D super-Tomcat did have 300km+ (450km for larger target like Tu-22M Backfire) range with the multi-element radar dish on the nose, with capability to lock on 32 targets and engage 16 of them at any single instant.  It is retired only due to old airplane airframe maintainence cost but cannot find any current new airframe large enough to deploy it.

War is all about money .....

[[i] 本帖最後由 BenChek 於 2007-12-20 09:05 編輯 [/i]]