推介:| Web Hosting | 外賣系統 | Server colocation | Web Shop System | Makeup course |

查看完整版本: 一夜隨影 - 請比D意見

usnameless 2007-12-8 03:42

一夜隨影 - 請比D意見

借左呢支鏡黎試: Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS
下次試 Canon 24-70L:pray:

相無乜特別, 但係全hand held 無用腳架, 無用閃光燈... with IS on. :help:
發現 IS 真係好好用...:goodluck:
支鏡好sharp, 色ok, 但係光影重重, 要加filter and hood.:please:

請比D意見...:bow:

ISO800 f/3.5 1/5S
[img]http://lh4.google.com/waimok0105/R1eznt2GmoI/AAAAAAAABZA/IWhOE9PA8fw/s800/IMG_3770_filtered.jpg[/img]

ISO800 f/2.8 1/10S
[img]http://lh3.google.com/waimok0105/R1ezpd2GmpI/AAAAAAAABZI/prQAbp1YaFU/s800/IMG_3712_filtered.jpg[/img]

ISO400 f/2.8 1/15S
[img]http://lh5.google.com/waimok0105/R1OnX92GmbI/AAAAAAAABWk/DRHnMc4OJRU/s800/IMG_3709_filtered.jpg[/img]

ISO1600 f/2.8 1/6S
[img]http://lh6.google.com/waimok0105/R1e1-N2GmsI/AAAAAAAABZk/rpI6ZRK7qSs/s800/IMG_3753_filtered.jpg[/img]

ISO1600 f/3.5 1/5S
[img]http://lh3.google.com/waimok0105/R1ezkd2GmmI/AAAAAAAABYU/ArwrX1wlShc/s800/IMG_3767_filtered.jpg[/img]

ISO800 f/2.8 1/10S
[img]http://lh5.google.com/waimok0105/R1ezi92GmlI/AAAAAAAABYM/zp2IPE2jwWk/s800/IMG_3713.JPG[/img]

ISO800 f/5.6 0.6S
[img]http://lh6.google.com/waimok0105/R1ewnN2GmeI/AAAAAAAABXU/-r8TZTHjYI4/s800/IMG_3934_filtered.jpg[/img]

ISO800 f/4.0 1/2S
[img]http://lh5.google.com/waimok0105/R1ewo92GmfI/AAAAAAAABXc/FtABoujcx6I/s800/IMG_3896_filtered.jpg[/img]

ISO800 f/2.8 0.6S
[img]http://lh4.google.com/waimok0105/R1ewqt2GmgI/AAAAAAAABXk/g76criM6t70/s800/IMG_3884_filtered.jpg[/img]

ISO800 f/3.2 1/3S
[img]http://lh4.google.com/waimok0105/R1ewst2GmhI/AAAAAAAABXs/0CWJVaEe1g4/s800/IMG_3879_filtered.jpg[/img]

ISO800 f/3.2 1/6S
[img]http://lh5.google.com/waimok0105/R1e0a92GmqI/AAAAAAAABZQ/jylhs5nLBXw/s800/IMG_3870_filtered.jpg[/img]

ISO800 f/3.2 1/6S
[img]http://lh5.google.com/waimok0105/R1ewY92GmdI/AAAAAAAABXM/2ZvmUebIBSU/s800/IMG_3860.JPG[/img]

oxyclean 2007-12-8 07:07

really nice technique with the Civic photo, i like that
also some of the photos turned out pretty sharp (particularly the city ones) consider the shutter was indeed very slow for handheld
good job!

usnameless 2007-12-8 08:20

[quote]原帖由 [i]oxyclean[/i] 於 12/7/2007 03:07 PM 發表
really nice technique with the Civic photo, i like that
also some of the photos turned out pretty sharp (particularly the city ones) consider the shutter was indeed very slow for handheld
good job! [/quote]

I didn't even know that was a Civic... :P
Just want to test if I can "pan" when I.S. is on.
Thanks for watching.

caca2 2007-12-15 12:34

not bad~thanks~

cherryc 2007-12-15 22:48

the pics are really good. good work

管你員 2007-12-20 22:07

very good !

thanks for sharing

lsta 2007-12-21 01:02

thanks for sharing

hkman1109 2007-12-21 19:34

the photos are qutie good!

parkers96 2008-1-3 11:16

Very good shots.  Personally, I would use1/8 to1/10S for the 1st one, just a little to bright for me.

usnameless 2008-1-3 13:33

[quote]原帖由 [i]parkers96[/i] 於 1/2/2008 07:16 PM 發表
Very good shots.  Personally, I would use1/8 to1/10S for the 1st one, just a little to bright for me. [/quote]

Agreed!  I was too eager to try out how slow of a SS I could get and didn't pay much attention to how bright it got... :P

Thanks!

cossie 2008-1-5 04:32

nice shots... thanks for sharing.

[quote]原帖由 [i]usnameless[/i] 於 2007-12-8 03:42 發表
借左呢支鏡黎試: Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS
下次試 Canon 24-70L:pray:

相無乜特別, 但係全hand held 無用腳架, 無用閃光燈... with IS on. :help:
發現 IS 真係好好用...:goodluck:
支鏡好sharp, 色ok, 但係 ... [/quote]

megaapple 2008-1-10 15:18

good

good technique
keep making photos, buddy!

imagine1980s 2008-1-11 00:34

Nice pictures

schallfalke 2008-1-11 19:55

中間四張影建築的很不錯,IS的威力充分顯現,以你這裡縮小了的相片和約0.5秒的快門……也差不多了,看來以這大小的相片很適合你。
不過我最喜歡的還是你拍那藍車的,看得出你的功力。

主要缺陷是雜訊,不過這是相機的問題,不是鏡頭的問題了。
不過……去到ISO 800,其實已經不錯了(尤其是與非Canon系的相機比較…)。
Canon的雜訊處理已算是最好的了。

dcdog 2008-1-17 00:16

good !:applause:

990 2008-1-17 17:18

Nice pictures

MovieMonster 2008-1-17 19:13

Good work!

The panning shot with the blue car (a great shot BTW) - did you use a different IS setting?  For some IS lenses there are two settings - one for both direction stablisation and one for a single direction stablisation (as for your case - panning).

The good thing about IS - you can shoot without a tripod (just about) in low light condition - with a higher ISO settings.  Noise may be a problem - but being able to just shoot without a tripod at night is great.

Thanks for sharing your work

usnameless 2008-1-18 05:20

[quote]原帖由 [i]MovieMonster[/i] 於 1/17/2008 03:13 AM 發表
Good work!

The panning shot with the blue car (a great shot BTW) - did you use a different IS setting?  For some IS lenses there are two settings - one for both direction stablisation and one fo ... [/quote]

Only certain IS lenses come with 2 IS modes, mode 1 for verticle and horizital stablisation.  Mode 2 for verticle stablisationonly (for panning).

The Canon 17-55 f/2.8 that I used only comes with mode 1.  Actually for the shot that I took, I believed I had the IS turned off.  It "should" give me a smoothier image.  For panning shots, keeping the image at the same place in your picture is the hardest thing to do.  Hand shake should not be a big concern at least for me.. ;)

zimp12 2008-1-18 21:06

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

KO4433 2008-1-22 14:59

nice view. Thank you provide.

fromcar 2008-1-22 15:19

very nice
i like that especially the blue car one

zimp12 2008-1-22 19:31

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

hk9413 2008-1-22 23:34

回復 #1 usnameless 的帖子

Very good and very colourful.  Thanks!

sam1980 2008-1-23 09:06

thanks for sharing !!

photosynthesis 2008-1-24 23:54

very nice photos, thanks for sharing

ggmm2008 2008-2-2 23:25

very good and very colourful! thank you very much  sharing.

浪心 2008-2-28 20:59

:applause::applause::applause::applause:

lcpd88 2008-3-3 01:16

好鐘意尾二果張相 , 效果好好~

nice skill  :lol 加油

希望你能分享更多相片:)

BillionBoy 2008-3-10 12:29

Good takes, the 17-55 f/2.8 is definitely a good lens, tho personally think that its a bit over-prized..

usnameless 2008-3-10 13:48

[quote]原帖由 [i]BillionBoy[/i] 於 3/9/2008 08:29 PM 發表
Good takes, the 17-55 f/2.8 is definitely a good lens, tho personally think that its a bit over-prized.. [/quote]

I will switch to 5D if there is a 24-70 f/2.8 IS!!!  :)

BillionBoy 2008-3-10 14:43

[quote]原帖由 [i]usnameless[/i] 於 2008-3-10 13:48 發表


I will switch to 5D if there is a 24-70 f/2.8 IS!!!  :) [/quote]

;P just switch anywaysss

btw, personally I think the IS is not really a absolute on the 24-70 range...tho it would always be convinent of cuz...


Im still training my " Plaster arm " with my SSW :jump:

warsw 2008-3-11 18:29

楼主的装备很精良。向你学习。。。。

seiko000 2008-3-17 09:01

nicely done! Keep it up!

jtk2500 2008-3-20 00:00

正~勁鍾意呢D拉爆既效果!好掂~

tonychan32176 2008-4-9 12:36

回復 #1 usnameless 的帖子

good shot !!

adidas_hands_up 2008-4-11 13:59

I m not a pro but 2 me these fotos look great n I can't ever never dream of taking such great pictures! Thank you for sharing n carry on the good job!:applause::applause::applause:

frank007hk 2008-4-15 03:30

nICE SHOT.......

usnameless 2008-4-17 12:48

[quote]原帖由 [i]adidas_hands_up[/i] 於 4/10/2008 09:59 PM 發表
I m not a pro but 2 me these fotos look great n I can't ever never dream of taking such great pictures! Thank you for sharing n carry on the good job!:applause::applause::applause: [/quote]

Thanks.  I am just learning...  :reading:

macbook1 2008-4-30 05:21

GOOD SHOT!!!

andrew.xx1 2008-5-5 01:38

Nice pictures

jason_morry 2008-5-9 22:26

gooddddddddddddd

tesco123 2008-5-10 18:53

不 錯, 多 謝 你 的 分 享 !

longmeiyan 2008-5-16 05:32

very good !

thanks for sharing

mynameishoi 2008-5-18 16:06

嘩,S1/3都保持到咁sharp.
我未試過用IS,睇落真係好正!
usnameless兄,呢度係唔係LA downtown 呢?在下去過一次,印象唔係好清楚:D
正相 :verygood:

ajizanmai 2008-5-18 16:38

Good pictures:verygood:

The lens 17-55 2.8 IS is really a good lens and recieved very good comments, although a bit expensive, but worth buying.

清心 2008-5-21 15:04

真是太漂亮了!感謝大哥的分享!
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: 一夜隨影 - 請比D意見