Rubber 2008-2-26 23:25
[quote]原帖由 [i]全軍盡[/i] 於 2008-2-26 22:52 發表
進修=真理:jaw:
咁日日迫車番學果一群小朋友咪=真理:L
咁不如求其[color=Red]上架校巴拉個鼻涕蟲去做處長[/color]喇..... 上�;P [/quote]
而家都差唔多
Rubber 2008-2-26 23:27
[quote]原帖由 [i]FXO[/i] 於 2008-2-26 06:25 發表
請舉證張光文說了些什麼侮辱人的話. [/quote]
點解無人答你嘅.. :wondering: :wondering:
Rubber 2008-2-26 23:29
[quote]原帖由 [i]無謂之[/i] 於 2008-2-26 22:17 發表
可以看38樓的意見
[/quote]
張文光真係經驗可以取代考試 達標 ?
全軍盡 2008-2-26 23:53
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
熊魔鬼 2008-2-27 00:24
[quote]原帖由 [i]毛球[/i] 於 2008-2-26 22:45 發表
咪係, 熊魔真過份. :soldier: [/quote]
我冇呀,
你千祈唔好學似周先生咁激動呀!
:lol
巴士茂李 2008-2-27 00:27
[color=Red][size=4][b]我讀得書少, 你地唔好呃我！
係唔係真係小學程度可以做大學效長先,
係我就去排定隊申請啦！
講真, 我好努力, 好叻㗎！
你地唔好歧視我呀！[/b][/size][/color]
:jump:
熊魔鬼 2008-2-27 00:33
[quote]原帖由 [i]巴士茂李[/i] 於 2008-2-27 00:27 發表
我讀得書少, 你地唔好呃我！
係唔係真係小學程度可以做大學效長先,
係我就去排定隊申請啦！
講真, 我好努力, 好叻㗎！
你地唔好?
:jump: [/quote]
政府有冇同你私下interview先?
:lol
全軍盡 2008-2-27 00:43
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
FXO 2008-2-27 06:48
[quote]原帖由 [i]Rubber[/i] 於 2008-2-26 23:27 發表
點解無人答你嘅.. :wondering: :wondering: [/quote]
人地無講過, 佢地點答?
搬出38樓的意見, 重笑死人, 佢點見解教師基準試同呢次港台降格事件根本係兩回事, 風馬牛不相及,
熊魔鬼 2008-2-27 08:48
[quote]原帖由 [i]港奸剋星[/i] 於 2008-2-26 22:46 發表
當年張文光係認為教師可以進修去達到資格
而唔係經驗
唔好歪曲真理去醜化你的敵人 [/quote]
唔去歪曲人地既講法,
唔扣帽子,
班打手仲邊有咁多野鬧?
;P
熊魔鬼 2008-2-27 08:56
香港已經有歧視法,
任何性質既歧視都可以投訴甚至控告,
周先生與其剩係識呱呱叫,
不如跑去平基會尋求協助啦.
;P
saltiwet 2008-2-27 09:29
我覺得唔係歧視佢, 好似有人請 簽得名 ge accountant, 有條傻佬計數好叻走去應徵, 人地話佢quali 唔夠. 佢吠人地學歷歧視, 咁又得唔得 ?
Rubber 2008-2-27 10:56
[quote]原帖由 [i]熊魔鬼[/i] 於 2008-2-27 08:48 發表
唔去歪曲人地既講法,
唔扣帽子,
班打手仲邊有咁多野鬧?
;P [/quote]
係噃 "pressed for" 解 "施壓" 就真見證 "無語教學" 嘅成就.
kcpw0n 2008-2-27 18:36
[quote]原帖由 [i]FXO[/i] 於 2008-2-26 06:25 發表
請舉證張光文說了些什麼侮辱人的話. [/quote]
[size=5]張聞肛在教改之立場是[color=Red]"大力反對要求教師基準試及格才可教英文, 並堅持經驗可彌補專業資格"[/color]但今次事件就強調學歷之重要,否則會矮化和侮辱港台,這樣前後不一的言論是精神分裂還是先前在教改時欺騙和蒙蔽學生和家長呢.他的誠信是否有問題呢.這是否是在侮辱人的話呢.[/size]
港奸剋星 2008-2-27 19:04
[quote]原帖由 [i]kcpw0n[/i] 於 2008-2-27 10:36 發表
張聞肛在教改之立場是"大力反對要求教師基準試及格才可教英文, 並堅持經驗可彌補專業資格"但今次事件就強調學歷之重要,否則會矮化和侮辱港台,這樣前後不一的言論是精神分裂還是先前在教改時欺騙和 ... [/quote]
當年張文光係認為教師可以進修去達到資格
而唔係經驗
唔好歪曲真理去醜化你的敵人
因為你的歪理根本打不倒張文光的真理
無謂之 2008-2-27 21:11
[quote]原帖由 [i]熊魔鬼[/i] 於 2008-2-27 08:56 發表
香港已經有歧視法,
任何性質既歧視都可以投訴甚至控告,
周先生與其剩係識呱呱叫,
不如跑去平基會尋求協助啦.
;P [/quote]
並不是所有歧視都在受理範圍
superheman 2008-2-28 00:36
[quote]原帖由 [i]港奸剋星[/i] 於 2008-2-27 07:04 PM 發表
當年張文光係認為教師可以進修去達到資格
而唔係經驗
唔好歪曲真理去醜化你的敵人
因為你的歪理根本打不倒張文光的真理 [/quote]
Ok, according to Cheung's statement, a person without U degree can also improve himself by continue study and experience. If so, why Cheung insist only U degree holder is qualified for the application ? :wondering:
FXO 2008-2-28 06:30
[quote]原帖由 [i]superheman[/i] 於 2008-2-28 00:36 發表
Ok, according to Cheung's statement, a person without U degree can also improve himself by continue study and experience. If so, why Cheung insist only U degree holder is qualified for the ap ... [/quote]
因為政府架構中, D5既最低入職條件其中一項係有大學學位.
superheman 2008-2-28 11:52
Well, the headline of this thread is 張文光的言論. We are not talking about how right of wrong of Govt decision. And I only comment Cheung's statement, in my opinion, Cheung's statement is not logicial and inconsistence with his previous mindset.
That's is all my comment, and I will not respond anymore on this tropic !:o
FXO 2008-2-28 13:54
headline of this thread 點講都好, 張文光的言論卻是針對正苦降格而講, 佢點唔合邏輯呢?
V.V 2008-2-28 17:02
Firstly I declare I'm not a guy who has any prejudice against the Democratic Party.
I relly don't understand why Cheung Man Kong said so in a such high profile ~???
His speech only will push Gov't to repair RTHK faster, without any advantages to RTHK Lor~~
Why, Mr Cheung~??!!!
Now, Sir D Tsang and the DAB must be laughing happily ga ja bcoz they suddenly have a helping arm for free~~ :nono::nono::oh: :wondering::wondering::wondering:
飛毛腿 2008-2-28 17:14
慾照事件佔據報紙頭版廿九幾日
犯民政棍鵪鶉咁開聲又唔係, 唔開聲又曝光率下降
真係五內如焚 :burst:
家下好囉, 有位入製造話題
張聞肛帶頭一吠, 老中青們又可以跟尾吠餐飽:applause:
無謂之 2008-2-28 21:41
[quote]原帖由 [i]superheman[/i] 於 2008-2-28 11:52 發表
Well, the headline of this thread is 張文光的言論. We are not talking about how right of wrong of Govt decision. And I only comment Cheung's statement, in my opinion, Cheung's statement is not logi ... [/quote]
多謝你的見解，我其實都唔明，點解有d網友，會因為要支持張文光，而去轉移視線，另外，我再講多一次(其實已經講咗幾次)政府要降低入職要求，其實真的有問題，張文光的話的確有侮辱成份。