ces 2008-4-7 19:59
390, 1168,1800 compare and contrast
request for expert comments with reference to :
business potential
present PE
investability
thanks
peninsula 2008-4-7 21:29
[quote]原帖由 [i]ces[/i] 於 2008-4-7 19:59 發表
request for expert comments with reference to :
business potential
present PE
investability
thanks [/quote]
You mean 1186? I like that better!:quiet:
ces 2008-4-7 22:30
[quote]原帖由 [i]peninsula[/i] 於 2008-4-7 21:29 發表
You mean 1186? I like that better!:quiet: [/quote]
Yes 1186 mind further give your view on the three stocks of similiar kind?
流料 2008-4-7 23:09
i prefer 1186--->390--->1800
peninsula 2008-4-8 21:11
[quote]原帖由 [i]ces[/i] 於 2008-4-7 22:30 發表
Yes 1186 mind further give your view on the three stocks of similiar kind? [/quote]
Least gain so far and a lot of good projects.:o:reading::quiet:
peninsula 2008-4-9 19:19
[quote]原帖由 [i]pin[/i] 於 2008-4-8 23:24 發表
I perfer 1186 more [/quote]
Agreed!:givemefive:
peninsula 2008-4-10 20:34
[quote]原帖由 [i]ces[/i] 於 2008-4-10 01:35 發表
how about their PE [/quote]
If you look at P/E, none are worth buying!:dizzy:
ilovekaren 2008-4-13 02:42
[quote]原帖由 [i]流料[/i] 於 2008-4-7 23:09 發表
i prefer 1186--->390--->1800 [/quote]
my preference is: 1800 better than 390 better than 1186
peninsula 2008-4-13 16:48
[quote]原帖由 [i]ilovekaren[/i] 於 2008-4-13 02:42 發表
my preference is: 1800 better than 390 better than 1186 [/quote]
Why ar?:wondering:
peninsula 2008-4-15 20:32
[quote]原帖由 [i]熊魔鬼.[/i] 於 2008-4-15 20:30 發表
1800我10蚊果陣買,
仲未放.:lol [/quote]
Good for long term.:verygood::D
熊魔鬼. 2008-4-15 20:36
[quote]原帖由 [i]peninsula[/i] 於 2008-4-15 20:32 發表
Good for long term.:verygood::D [/quote]
不過390都有一注$8.2
:L