至尊豪庭9 2008-5-4 13:09
抗議新版規破壞新聞自由!!
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
Rubber 2008-5-4 13:22
[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-5-4 13:09 發表
喂,我們好多時要尊重法庭有左判決,我們至可討論當事人有冇罪,本人就最支持這樣野,所以未有被法庭定罪之前我都假設佢地係無罪(雖然呢版有好多人唔支持呢樣野),唔對當事人評論,係唔係咁就唔可以轉貼公告有呢單新聞發 ... [/quote]
I support that the person posting anything should at least show some gesture about his/her feeling towards the news. ( ie. even a "Smilie" is sufficient ).
至尊豪庭9 2008-5-4 13:28
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
毛球 2008-5-4 14:06
[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-5-4 01:09 PM 發表
喂,我們好多時要尊重法庭有左判決,我們至可討論當事人有冇罪,本人就最支持這樣野,所以未有被法庭定罪之前我都假設佢地係無罪(雖然呢版有好多人唔支持呢樣野)因而唔對當事人評論,係唔係咁就唔可以轉貼公告有呢單新 ... [/quote]
唔評論貼上黎把鬼, 呢度唔係貼報區, 要睇新聞唔係上黎呢度. :saujai:
Olson 2008-5-4 15:16
討論討論，可討，可論 。
saltiwet 2008-5-4 17:22
有事就拿出來討論. 如果只貼別人的文章就叫參與, 我可以一日貼百幾則新聞, 破壞這裡的秩序. 如果你至尊豪庭覺得那件事有價值才會貼出來, 那就請把你的想法寫出來, 再等其他網友評價. 無緣無故狂貼洗版和在公眾地方塗鴉有什麼分別.
Rubber 2008-5-4 20:23
If someone post a news thread, others can comment about it and let it grow or not responding to it and let it sink.
Therefore instead of limiting the post content,
I suggest limiting to one thread per news topic,
if there is already a thread in that news,
no new thread shall be create on the same news topic.
saltiwet 2008-5-4 22:12
The initiator of any thread in this forum should have his/her own ground and opinion supported by the news. I don't see the reason if someone should post the news but have no concern about the news.
Only cowards are afraid of expressing their comments and thoughts.
[[i] 本帖最後由 saltiwet 於 2008-5-4 22:13 編輯 [/i]]
毛球 2008-5-4 23:40
[quote]原帖由 [i]Rubber[/i] 於 2008-5-4 08:23 PM 發表
If someone post a news thread, others can comment about it and let it grow or not responding to it and let it sink.
Therefore instead of limiting the post content,
I suggest limiting to one th ... [/quote]
Still if just posting different news of same topic under same thread are not meaningful here without some opinion expressed. In fact it has not been a big deal in the past but recently there are "some people" doing this too frequently and intentionally making the discussion really difficult and not interesting to the others.
kcpw0n 2008-5-5 00:02
抗議新版規破壞新聞自由!!
未經咨詢就倉卒發表禁制張貼新聞新版規,是不文明之大石壓死蟹專制行為,抗議版主野蠻行為.
auriga00 2008-5-5 01:56
[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-5-4 13:09 發表
喂,我們好多時要尊重法庭有左判決,我們至可討論當事人有冇罪,本人就最支持這樣野,所以未有被法庭定罪之前我都假設佢地係無罪(雖然呢版有好多人唔支持呢樣野)因而唔對當事人評論,係唔係咁就唔可以轉貼公告有呢單新 ... [/quote]
呢度係討論區，係俾大家發表個人意見。
我地在此亂吹亦不見得有能力左右任何法庭判決。
況且閣下都唔係次次貼法庭新聞．．．
港奸剋星 2008-5-5 08:43
你有張良計
我有過長梯
不過今日剛入場才收到兩個唔係版主的警告
似乎無的放矢
根本不合理
呢度似乎有人偽用版主資格去對本版言論說三道四
呢點我反對
八皇爺 2008-5-5 11:09
[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-5-4 05:09 發表
喂,我們好多時要尊重法庭有左判決,我們至可討論當事人有冇罪,本人就最支持這樣野,所以未有被法庭定罪之前我都假設佢地係無罪(雖然呢版有好多人唔支持呢樣野)因而唔對當事人評論,係唔係咁就唔可以轉貼公告有呢單新 ... [/quote]
在標題注明【法庭新聞】可以不作評論。
請提供超鏈結，方便證實消息來源。
閣下認為如何？
auriga00 2008-5-5 11:47
[quote]原帖由 [i]港奸剋星[/i] 於 2008-5-5 08:43 發表
你有張良計
我有過長梯
不過今日剛入場才收到兩個唔係版主的警告
似乎無的放矢
根本不合理
呢度似乎有人偽用版主資格去對本版言論說三道四
呢點我反對 [/quote]
唔似其他版，呢版比較特別，好多由網友大家互相評分
kcpw0n 2008-5-5 12:07
[quote]原帖由 [i]auriga00[/i] 於 2008-5-5 11:47 發表
唔似其他版，呢版比較特別，好多由網友大家互相評分 [/quote]
星哥唔懂裝懂,哈哈,唔明就扮明,連本討論區之網友互相評分制度都唔知就咁多投訴,會俾人笑無知架.都係版主深明大義,袋錢落佢袋.
kcpw0n 2008-5-5 15:47
胡亂無厘頭寫幾個字或斷章取義張貼殘缺不全之新聞就可堂而煌之算討論主題和內容,這對原作者更是一種侮辱,所以堅持抗議新版規破壞新聞自由!!
Rubber 2008-5-5 16:54
[quote]原帖由 [i]saltiwet[/i] 於 2008-5-4 22:12 發表
The initiator of any thread in this forum should have his/her own ground and opinion supported by the news. I don't see the reason if someone should post the news but have no concern about the news ... [/quote]
Yes.. the point is we have no objective rule about what is sufficient ?
In some cases, I think as small as a smilie is sufficient.
We can challenge the thread starter with questions and opinion if we want to elaborate or clarify some points.
港奸剋星 2008-5-5 20:14
[quote]原帖由 [i]kcpw0n[/i] 於 2008-5-5 04:07 發表
星哥唔懂裝懂,哈哈,唔明就扮明,連本討論區之網友互相評分制度都唔知就咁多投訴,會俾人笑無知架.都係版主深明大義,袋錢落佢袋. [/quote]
我知係你寫評分
你應該申報利益
你與版主係咪同一人?
係咪相同政治集團?
係咪偽建制派?
由頭到尾都係得你一個投訴咋
你根本就係借制度打壓異己
不折不扣的親共派
不是
你可能根本就係中共黨員
peninsula 2008-5-5 21:26
[quote]原帖由 [i]Rubber[/i] 於 2008-5-4 13:22 發表
I support that the person posting anything should at least show some gesture about his/her feeling towards the news. ( ie. even a "Smilie" is sufficient ). [/quote]
No "cut and paste" should be allowed.:o
kcpw0n 2008-5-5 21:38
[quote]原帖由 [i]港奸剋星[/i] 於 2008-5-5 20:14 發表
我知係你寫評分
你應該申報利益
你與版主係咪同一人?
係咪相同政治集團?
係咪偽建制派?
由頭到尾都係得你一個投訴咋
你根本就係借制度打壓異己
不折不扣的親共派
不是
你可能根本就係中共黨員 [/quote]
評分制度是本討論區一個特點,好嘅要讚,差就要彈,只關心評分之得失而不考慮評分者之意見,就浪費評分者人家之苦心和壇主設計之苦心.
港奸剋星 2008-5-5 21:47
[quote]原帖由 [i]kcpw0n[/i] 於 2008-5-5 13:38 發表
評分制度是本討論區一個特點,好嘅要讚,差就要彈,只關心評分之得失而不考慮評分者之意見,就浪費評分者人家之苦心和壇主設計之苦心. [/quote]
各有各意見
更何況涉及政見立場
悉隨尊便
但我就反對有人用評分制度打壓異己
kcpw0n 2008-5-5 21:54
不自反省,只頑固一錯到底是愚不可及之行為,閣下要做阿Q,無話可說,自求多福吧.
breatharian 2008-5-5 22:11
[quote]原帖由 [i]kcpw0n[/i] 於 2008-5-5 21:38 發表
評分制度是本討論區一個特點,好嘅要讚,差就要彈,只關心評分之得失而不考慮評分者之意見,就浪費評分者人家之苦心和壇主設計之苦心. [/quote]
不如老實d講: 岩聽既就讚，唔岩聽既就彈;P;P;P
peninsula 2008-5-5 22:12
[quote]原帖由 [i]breatharian[/i] 於 2008-5-5 22:11 發表
不如老實d講: 岩聽既就讚，唔岩聽既就彈;P;P;P [/quote]
That is law of nature!:P:hamsup:
kcpw0n 2008-5-5 22:18
用詞如何,就各自表述吧.
港奸剋星 2008-5-6 00:43
[quote]原帖由 [i]kcpw0n[/i] 於 2008-5-5 14:18 發表
用詞如何,就各自表述吧. [/quote]
各自表述
好易被人偷換概念
兩岸尚且如此
有些事
先打生打死好過食人豆腐
港奸剋星 2008-5-6 01:00
回應樓主及版主
重申以下︰
1.貼文對於今日大量內地同胞充斥本版,極為重要,因為可以將內地禁止的政治資訊借本平台提供畀佢地
2.作為政治表態宣示及反制
ericwong4362 2008-5-6 19:15
[quote]原帖由 [i]港奸剋星[/i] 於 2008-5-5 20:14 發表
我知係你寫評分
你應該申報利益
你與版主係咪同一人?
係咪相同政治集團?
係咪偽建制派?
由頭到尾都係得你一個投訴咋
你根本就係借制度打壓異己
不折不扣的親共派
不是
你可能根本就係中共黨員 [/quote]
有网友同我讲，Ryo系虚构人物…根本无此人
[url]http://59.188.23.229/f/thread-187873-1-1.html[/url]
至尊豪庭9 2008-5-6 20:27
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
至尊豪庭9 2008-5-6 20:31
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
至尊豪庭9 2008-5-6 20:44
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
peninsula 2008-5-6 21:14
[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-5-6 20:27 發表
:verygood::verygood::verygood::verygood::verygood: [/quote]
Some comments, gestures, short sentence etc.:o
至尊豪庭9 2008-5-6 22:11
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
至尊豪庭9 2008-5-6 22:17
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
頁:
[1]