查看完整版本: Abbey Interior

Abbey Interior

Hexham Abbey - May 2008. Taken with Canon 40D.

[img] [img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3264/2521107334_826fdbe311.jpg[/img] [/img]

[img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2382/2520290077_d3dacbec1c.jpg[/img]

Beautiful colours and lighting.
Did you use flash?

[quote]原帖由 [i]MovieMonster[/i] 於 5/27/2008 06:07 AM 發表
Hexham Abbey - May 2008. Taken with Canon 40D.

[img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3264/2521107334_826fdbe311.jpg[/img]

[img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2382/2520290077_d3dacbec1c.jpg[/img] [/quote]

C Hing 強項...  HDR??

Yes, usmaeless, well spotted - HDR - with careful blending to create as natural as possible lighting.  Three exposures +2, 0 and -2 ev, without flash of course.  

BTW - I like your perfect macro shots, and well carried out experiments with water droplets.  They are excellent!

我係初學者, 玩玩下.  多謝意見!

Woo .... HDR images !!! .... :verygood:

I've heard about HDR but never tried. So I want to ask the following Qs about HDR :

1. Is "3 exposures" a must in making HDR? Somebody say 2 or even 1 is enough.
2. Should I take RAW or JPG?
3. Besides Photomatix, is there other softwares that is convenient to be used in making HDRi?

Thank you very much. :bow:

Q1: It depends on the dynamic range (i.e. the level of contrast between hightlights and shadows).  If the dynamic range is not high - one can get away with one shot.  Otherwise two, three or even five expsoures may be needed to prevent total white or black out - i.e. to prevent pixels that have values of 0 (complete black) or 255 (complete white) that cannot be further processed.  The shots shown here are taken with three exposures 0, +2 and -2 evs.  This example shown below that I have experimented last year was taken with one shot - the dynamic range is not diverse and I can get away with it - with the bonus that the sky is musch more interesting than the original version.

[img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2227/2300316049_86b17ae4a7.jpg[/img]

Q2. Raw is preferred as raw format captures more data than JPG.  Although JPG can still be used the results can be limited.  Raw format has a depth of 24 or 48 bit, a tiff format 16 bit and JPG 8 bit - you loose data and hence definitions with JPGs.

Q3 - Photoshop CS3/CS2 has this feature built in and is quite easy to use.  There are one or two others that I have tried as well.

Cheers

Thanks a lot :applause: :verygood:

[quote]原帖由 [i]usnameless[/i] 於 2008-5-29 03:37 發表


C Hing 強項...  HDR?? [/quote]


其實點知呢張相係HDR 呢?
:help:

[quote]原帖由 [i]yannieyam[/i] 於 6/6/2008 04:41 PM 發表



其實點知呢張相係HDR 呢?
:help: [/quote]

一般HDR色彩較濃, 陰影位少, 相既立體感亦較唔統一...

[[i] 本帖最後由 usnameless 於 2008-6-6 22:50 編輯 [/i]]