查看完整版本: 訂最低工資 時薪33至35元

訂最低工資 時薪33至35元

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-10-5 10:09 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5381383&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
薪2 ... [/quote]
Terrible. Too low!:'(

$33一個鐘, 一日做十個鐘, 一個月做廿四日, 月薪 = $7,920, OK嗎?

[quote]原帖由 [i]Rainybreeze[/i] 於 2008-10-5 23:41 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5385090&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
$33一個鐘, 一日做十個鐘, 一個月做廿四日, 月薪 = $7,920, OK嗎? [/quote]

沒有絕對answer. 但以保安員及清潔工人來說, 應該是OK.

"不可低於綜援水平"

冇人覺得Ｄ拎綜援既拎得太多, 要用綜援來比較最低工資而唔係倒番轉?

冇明確殘疾(體能或心理), 長期病患或低於65歲根本唔應該可以申請綜援.

有手有腳既乞丐唔應該當作人類處理.  夜班普通住宅大廈既保安(唔使點做野嗰種) 都開價$8000.  冇工開係自己攞嚟, 呢D廢物冇權問政府攞錢.

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-10-6 19:19 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5389289&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
傾緊,唔夠可以加,唔好心急! [/quote]
OK la - start from a base first.:o

[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-10-6 19:25 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5389309&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

一日十粒鐘?你當人係黑奴呀?你唔好話一日十八粒鐘,合理每日八粒(包食飯時間)廿六日,得個6864都唔係高啦!!:saujai: [/quote]

[color=#000000][size=2][font=Arial][font=新細明體]哦[/font], [font=新細明體]一日十粒鐘[/font], [font=新細明體]你就先入為主唔連飯鐘同休息[/font], [font=新細明體]就係黑奴[/font]. [/font][/size][/color]
[size=2][color=#000000] [/color][/size]
[color=#000000][size=2][font=Arial][font=新細明體]我都當長短周[/font], [font=新細明體]你就要全長[/font]. [font=新細明體]喂[/font], [font=新細明體]美國同祖國都係四十小時一周[/font]. [font=新細明體]其餘加班另計[/font]. [font=新細明體]祖國仲定明每星期最少要有一日休息[/font].
[font=新細明體]你講野咁大聲[/font], [font=新細明體]要跟咩規矩[/font], [font=新細明體]你講清楚喇[/font].[/font][/size][/color]
[color=#000000][size=2][font=Arial]
[/font][/size][/color]
[color=#000000][size=2][font=Arial]講時講, 你做邊行, 如果係會計就精彩.[/font][/size][/color]
[size=2][/size]

[quote]原帖由 [i]Rainybreeze[/i] 於 2008-10-7 01:42 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5391352&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]


[size=2]哦, 一日十粒鐘, 你就先入為主唔連飯鐘同休息, 就係黑奴.

我都當長短周, 你就要全長. 喂, 美國同祖國都係四十小時一周. 其餘加班另計. 祖國仲定明每星期最少要有一日休息.
你講野咁大聲, 要跟咩規矩, 你講 ... [/size]
[size=2][/size]
[color=#000000][size=2]講時講, 你做邊行, 如果係會計就精彩.[color=#262626][/quote][/color][/size][/color]
[size=2][/size]
[size=2]會計就應該唔係,佢叫豪廷9,咁應該同大廈~看門或[/size]
[size=2]食蕉有關掛;P (估吓啫)[/size]

Funny...d公司講紧炒人

and these people are asking for min. wages....;P

[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-10-6 19:28 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5389319&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

唔OK,8小時一日(包食飯時間)26日,8500蚊(唔計扣強積金)就OK! [/quote]

用你這標淮, 現時全港薪酬結構都要大改.

現時, 很多文職員工, 都是7K to 8K (未扣強積金), 工時也大多超過9小時, 加班沒錢補, 特別是會計行業

他们要争取的东西，足足迟了一个经济循环！ :oh:

[quote]原帖由 [i]CAB[/i] 於 2008-10-7 04:27 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5391925&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Funny...d公司講紧炒人
and these people are asking for min. wages....;P [/quote]
2 different issues!:soldier:

but better ask for 失业保障 now。:L

政府跟企业一齐减肥，炒左班副局长，政治助理 （又”副“又”助理“，单是个名已经话俾你知是冗员！），用来做失业救济金！

[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-10-6 07:28 PM 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5389319&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

唔OK,8小時一日(包食飯時間)26日,8500蚊(唔計扣強積金)就OK! [/quote]
依家d寫字樓一般文員都係約7-9千蚊月薪連強積金返5日半8-9小時一日包食飯時間OT冇錢補, 最低工資要達到你d條件咁其他職位待遇全部都要相應調高, 僱主人力成本增加一係加價, 消費者支出又大左即係得個吉, 一係將公司北移甚至結業致失業率增加, 到時齊齊等致府救濟. :clap:

沒有絕對answer,不低於綜援水平. , 應該是OK

[quote]原帖由 [i]CAB[/i] 於 2008-10-7 13:54 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5393247&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
炒左班副局长，政治助理 （又”副“又”助理“，单是个名已经话俾你知是冗员！）. [/quote]
Excellent idea!:verygood:

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-10-7 10:00 PM 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5395240&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

要北移一早移左啦,商家佬有錢(賴)到盡啦,加咁多租夠增加成本啦,你唔小下??:fire: [/quote]
我幾時有小你? :wondering:

我都係打工仔，
我覺得打工仔爭取權益係天經地義，
但不適宜將商人或僱主妖魔化，
咁對解決問題係無幫助。

[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-10-7 22:00 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5395240&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
時代
要北移一早移左啦,商家佬有錢(賴)到盡啦,加咁多租夠增加成本啦,你唔小下??:fire: [/quote]

但如果成本不斷增加, 便會迫使雇主將可以遷移工序轉向低成本的地方.特別在電子資訊發達,的時代, 很多文書, 後勤的工序都可以遷移.

本人都是打工仔, 不斷受到高層的壓力, 如何可以減少人手, 節省成本.

[quote]原帖由 [i]理魯竇[/i] 於 2008-10-7 23:29 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5395800&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
我都係打工仔，
。 [/quote]
Not all employers are bad.:lookaround:

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

[quote]原帖由 [i]peninsula[/i] 於 2008-10-7 13:40 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5393190&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

2 different issues!:soldier: [/quote]
你可以話係different issues,但係絕對有莫大關係, 而唔可以唔去作出考慮.

簡化作出比如, 最低工資一出, 一定會影響 "所有" 行業, 最前線, 茶餐廳, 7仔, 百佳, 零售, 後勤有會計, 文員, 雜工, 送貨. 個市好既時候, 咪加價. 大家有多d咪洗多d.

個市唔好, 左減右治之後, 都要加價. 大家咪飲少杯咖啡, 出少d街, 洗少d錢, 睇下邊個失業先.  高通脹加高失業, 好似叫"stagflation".

以往經濟出問題, 都係工業支持住, 生產力出口. 但係今次會有d唔同.  有無留意東莞10億救中小企. 銀碼係小, 重點係姿態, 有無朋友做廠?  同佢地傾傾, 問題係好嚴重.

首先搞清楚, 我唔係反對最低工資.  但係做野一定要睇大勢時機.  對或者錯係好主觀既一回事, 不過, 現實就客觀到不得了, 唔好同我講一步就可以到烏托邦.

車要維修找車房, 病要睇醫生, 電路要交比工程師.  依定美國經濟出問題都係由 Bernanke 同 Paulson 諗計去處理. 咩叫專業知識. 而我地香港尊貴議員, 有幾多專業知識, 大家心裡有數.  

尊貴議員唔識唔係問題, 無人可以識所有野, 咪聽取專業意見, 然後基於 "香港整體利益", 而唔係 "私人主觀執著, 或者政治分數, 票源利益" 來做野.
民主嗎, 好似長毛係"高票"當選, 咪睇下佢地點做.

最低工資, 咪最低工資.  經濟出問題, 就唔好一句說話, "行政失當",  班尊貴議員就好似完全無責任.

If it's cleaning, security, fast food etc, then eventually this will be passed on to everybody, higher mgn't fee, food prices...it's all of us paying the bill, no free lunch.

If SMEs, many of the owners actually not earn that much (or maybe even lower than salary man). But they created jobs for others, and take risks (think of those toys recall, toxic paints etc, easily they will lose all they have), & i think they deserve some respect.

Actually, most SME owners earn their fortune from stocks & property investments. Their biz can't create a fortune to them.

[quote]原帖由 [i]peninsula[/i] 於 2008-10-5 11:18 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5381640&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

Terrible. Too low!:'( [/quote]

What's acceptable hour rate from your point of view?

[quote]原帖由 [i]至尊豪庭9[/i] 於 2008-10-8 21:08 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5400638&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

都話要走一早走左啦,而家夠冇最低工資啦,可以走的商家佬咪一樣走,走唔到的就一定要留0係香港,清潔,保安,等好多都走唔到,你咪用以偏概全呢招黎拆啦,冇人信呀.
你老細想減人手叫佢執左間野啦,咁就唔使請人囉,小你老 ... [/quote]

我老細都是打工仔, 他都要比人小.

[quote]原帖由 [i]public59[/i] 於 2008-10-8 00:25 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5396192&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
但如果成本不斷增加, 便會迫使雇主將可以遷移工序轉向低成本的地方.特別在電子資訊發達,的時代, 很多文書, 後勤的工序都可以遷移.
本人都是打工仔, 不斷受到高層的壓力, 如何可以減少人手, 節省成本. [/quote]
傻啦!!! 呢幾年唔流行遷移, 家下流行關門大吉 :L

[quote]原帖由 [i]public59[/i] 於 2008-10-8 22:37 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5401093&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
What's acceptable hour rate from your point of view? [/quote]
At least $40. Now, things are so expensive and economy is going down the tube.:dizzy::afraid:

[quote]原帖由 [i]peninsula[/i] 於 2008-10-10 21:02 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5410788&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

At least $40. Now, things are so expensive and economy is going down the tube.:dizzy::afraid: [/quote]
物價同經濟係的而且確既事實, 但係$40 最低工資係咪答案?

遠既, 高地價房屋問題, 有人曾經想用8萬5公屋來做答案.

近既, 尊貴既黃議員, 叫取消強積金, 就每個香港人張來都會退休保障. 人口老化會點? d錢響邊到來?

千絲萬縷, 如果真係高d最低工資就可以解決問題, 不如比夠時薪$100, 我都想大家多d錢洗.

[quote]原帖由 [i]Rainybreeze[/i] 於 2008-10-11 20:25 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5416071&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
物價同經濟係的而且確既事實, 但係$40 最低工資係咪答案?
遠既, 高地價房屋問題, 有人曾經想用8萬5公屋來做答案.
近既, 尊貴既黃議員, 叫取消強積金, 就每個香港人張來都會退休保障. 人口老化會點? d錢響邊到 ... [/quote]
There must be a basis.:lookaround:

[quote]原帖由 [i]peninsula[/i] 於 2008-10-11 20:42 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5416110&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

There must be a basis.:lookaround: [/quote]
[size=2][color=#000000]Not only there must be a basis; there HAS been a basis, which HAS been dictated by the market.
The concern is whether the government should intervene the labor market? how should it be done? what are the consequences of such intervention?[/color][/size]
[size=2][color=#000000] [/color][/size]
[size=2][color=#000000]There aren't simple answers, but one thing for sure is, hopefully, someone who knows what he/she is talking will answer this questions for Hong Kong.[/color][/size]

[quote]原帖由 [i]peninsula[/i] 於 2008-10-10 21:02 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5410788&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

At least $40. Now, things are so expensive and economy is going down the tube.:dizzy::afraid: [/quote]

It makes sense to have a higher min hour rate if things are so expensive.
But if the economy is going down, is it still necessary to compulsory set a higher min hour rate? It should be determined by market.

Some reports about the effect of minimum wage ordinance :
In UK and USA, the findings have been
1/  There has " no measurable adverse effect on employment or inflation."
2/  No obvious incentive for young people to leave full time education and start working.

http://www.lowpay.gov.uk/lowpay/report/pdf/2006_Min_Wage.pdf

http://www.risep-fiu.org/reports/Florida_Minimum_Wage_Report.pdf

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

[quote]原帖由 [i]public59[/i] 於 2008-10-12 01:10 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5417632&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
It makes sense to have a higher min hour rate if things are so expensive.
But if the economy is going down, is it still necessary to compulsory set a higher min hour rate? It should be determined ... [/quote]
At least, something that is reasonable and acceptable to all.:lookaround::o

唔明香港的大業主咁無良心,市道一好就加租,完全唔理d經營者能否負擔.

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

[quote]原帖由 [i]oneout[/i] 於 2008-10-12 16:56 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5420742&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
唔明香港的大業主咁無良心,市道一好就加租,完全唔理d經營者能否負擔. [/quote]

所以過去幾十年, 經濟成果/利潤大部份去了大業主及地產商- very unhealthy.
經營者便向打工仔開刀.

[quote]原帖由 [i]Rubber[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:09 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5419232&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Some reports about the effect of minimum wage ordinance :
In UK and USA, the findings have been
1/  There has " no measurable adverse effect on employment or inflation."
2/  No obvious incentive fo ... [/quote]

From a fundamental scientifical stand point, if the above reports' conclusions are to be applied to Hong Kong, the reports' premises and pre-conditions should be in agreement with Hong Kong's conditions for the conclusion to be valid.

I presume you have read the reports.  In UK's case, in drawing the conclusion, what were they doing to the minimium wages?

In Florida's case, do you think the construction industry blooming (Thanks for CDS and CDO) has anything to do with the economy status at 2005?

Here's a link from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
[url=http://www.frbatlanta.org/invoke.cfm?objectid=98D5072C-5056-9F06-99352E51FC7900C1&method=display]http://www.frbatlanta.org/invoke.cfm?objectid=98D5072C-5056-9F06-99352E51FC7900C1&method=display[/url]

我以前做個一間公司，
由清潔公司承包清潔工作，
有兩個亞嬸長駐清潔，
工作量不多，
佢地樂於每月收三千幾，
如果落實最少每月6864，
肯定兩個只能活一個。

可能好心變左做壞事。

[quote]原帖由 [i]Rainybreeze[/i] 於 2008-10-13 01:05 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5423065&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]


From a fundamental scientifical stand point, if the above reports' conclusions are to be applied to Hong Kong, the reports' premises and pre-conditions should be in agreement with Hong Kong's cond ... [/quote]

In the UK, from the report, they have been increasing the min wage on a yearly rate higher than the average national income increase, that means the lowest income groups are increasing their income.

In the Florida case, there have been a yearly chat and showing that employment rate has increase with respect to nation (USA) wide figures.

I like to point out that the same argument about "job lost", "inflation" has been cited in these countries but that did not happened in reality.

Of course, you are right that the economic model, the culture, the spending (or saving) behaviour all have an impact and social science is not an "exact" science, we have to do what we believe is right and adjust if there is any shortcoming surfaced.

[[i] 本帖最後由 Rubber 於 2008-10-13 11:29 編輯 [/i]]

[quote]原帖由 [i]Rubber[/i] 於 2008-10-13 11:26 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5424570&ptid=219320][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]


In the UK, from the report, they have been increasing the min wage on a yearly rate higher than the average national income increase, that means the lowest income groups are increasing their incom ... [/quote]

For UK, here is the link to the Low Pay Commission Report 2008

[url=http://www.lowpay.gov.uk/lowpay/report/pdf/2008_Min_Wage.pdf]http://www.lowpay.gov.uk/lowpay/report/pdf/2008_Min_Wage.pdf[/url]

Do read the Chairman's Foreward

For Florida, on 2005, with the cheap mortgage readily available, they were selling Florida like paradise at an arm's length.  With no real production output increase, yet the property market was blooming.  Jobs were everywhere at that stage of economy.

Behavioral science is not exact science.  I give you that.  But we believe in science, I think we should never doubt the emprical methodolgy of science.  

Newton is wrong. NO! There is just something beyond Newton, we call that Quantum Physics.