fs8218 2009-1-18 01:33
Sigma or Tamron??
如果想買支 18-200 or 18-250, Sigma or Tamron 好d呢??
Budget 所限, 加上又唔係專業, 兩者質素邊隻好d呢??
Thanks!
victory999 2009-1-18 12:50
[url]http://forum.timway.com/f/thread-222450-1-2.html[/url]
brunokuan 2009-2-14 22:56
Sigma is better
Bonkinasia 2009-2-20 08:48
Same situation last time when I am considering purchasing between these 2 brands.
Sigma 18-200, f:3.5 - f:6.3 with OS (Optical Stabiliser) .
Cannon called Image Stabiliser (IS) while Nikkon called Variation Reduction (VR).
Low speed lenses with aperture F:4 and above better opt for OS features.
Tamron 18-250 does not have OS, not doubt it is lighter and cheaper.
Finally I purchase Sigma 18-200mm lenses instead. Since then I have been using this set of lenses during my travel in the mainland. The photos taken are shape and good as comparable with my existing Canon kit lenses.
But I am still looking for 28 - 70 mm F:2.8 with macro and Standars lenses 50mm f:1.2. These 2 higher speed lenses are rather expensive. Hope that this poor economy will help to lower the price of these lenses before I make purchase again.
hamninewest 2009-2-25 18:24
For 雜牌 lens I think Sigma is better. I have compared the two brand and found that Sigma lens is sharper than Tamron.
peninsula 2009-2-25 21:49
[quote]原帖由 [i]hamninewest[/i] 於 2009-2-25 18:24 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=6201746&ptid=235207][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
For 雜牌 lens I think Sigma is better. I have compared the two brand and found that Sigma lens is sharper than Tamron. [/quote]
Sigma is 雜牌 :funk:
victory999 2009-2-25 22:51
[quote]原帖由 [i]peninsula[/i] 於 2009-2-25 09:49 PM 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=6203713&ptid=235207][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Sigma is 雜牌 :funk: [/quote]
sigma 105mm定焦2.8恒定光圈
khadafy 2009-2-26 03:37
[quote]原帖由 [i]peninsula[/i] 於 2009-2-25 21:49 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=6203713&ptid=235207][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Sigma is 雜牌 :funk: [/quote]
半島師兄......死馬並不是大廠...所以叫什牌也不過份..
整幾張相卑大家比較下..
(以下價錢以行貨計算)
上,Canon 17-40 F4[color=red] L[/color] $5,100.
中,Sigma 18-50 F2.8EX DC MACRO HSM $3,300.
下,騰龍 17-35 F2.8-4 Di(A05) $2,350 (2008-08-27)而家可能仲平D
moxfactor 2009-2-26 19:29
Sigma EX 鏡唔差得過N或C記... 非EX鏡就難講d... 28-300mm就直頭係差. 我70-200用Sigma, sharpness效果可同小白匹敵. 10-20mm就中上啦, 我鍾意係因為個distortion勁, 可以玩野, 唔同Tokina支11-16咁直. 仲有支150mm f2.8 macro 係非常唔錯既選擇.
Tokina 有留意過既出位鏡得支 11-16mm
Tamron 睇美國網就話係3大雜記中出最好既superzoom, 18-200, 28-300
(AF18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC, AF28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di VC , 等等... 都係唔錯既選擇)
peninsula 2009-2-26 21:43
[quote]原帖由 [i]victory999[/i] 於 2009-2-25 22:51 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=6204315&ptid=235207][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
sigma 105mm定焦2.8恒定光圈 [/quote]
Seems quite sharp wor!;P:loveliness:
victory999 2009-2-27 01:28
[quote]原帖由 [i]peninsula[/i] 於 2009-2-26 09:43 PM 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=6215086&ptid=235207][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Seems quite sharp wor!;P:loveliness: [/quote]
呢支鏡好正架.:byebye:
[[i] 本帖最後由 victory999 於 2009-2-27 01:30 編輯 [/i]]