查看完整版本: 3328

3328

各位點看這隻股啊！匯豐會否慢慢揪大佢呀！5元樓下入得嗎？:bow:

$5 樓下可以一試

不過小心高p/e...我唔suggest 人買p/e 高過22 既股

there is law in China that limited the foreign bank holding percentage in a bank in China, so I don't think HSBC will 揪大佢 in this moment......btw totally agree with brother Cumine...P/E is way too high, it's easy to drop back in a dramatic way.

[quote]原帖由 [i]cumine[/i] 於 2006-8-27 05:31 PM 發表
不過小心高p/e...我唔suggest 人買p/e 高過22 既股 [/quote]

Agree!! P/E too high!
I think around 17 to 18 is better!

P/E too high!

as a bank, I personal think P/E below 18 is more reason, Citibank and HSBC both below 14...

I think you can buy below $4.8.
I also have 3328 and held for 1 year already.
My target price is over $6 but need to hold for long terms.

what do brothers here think of it compare to 939...which is better???

回復 #9 Dave1968 的帖子

I think 939 & 3328 is also good in management.
But 939 is too big, so it will be difficult to rise.

I think we should not consider the PE in isolation.  We need to consider PE together with its expected rate of increase in profit.

There is a term called PEG ratio = PE / (expected rate of increase in profit).

For a bank with size like HSBC or CITIBANK, a rate of increase in profit of 15% would be a very good performance.

However, for 3328, the latest annouced increase in profit is about 30%.

When comparing the PEG ratio, 3328 might not be more "expensive" than HSBC/CITIBANK.

Finally, the most important consideration is the "rate of increase in profit" and will it last in the future.

[quote]原帖由 [i]yl_cheng[/i] 於 2006-8-30 11:44 AM 發表
I think we should not consider the PE in isolation.  We need to consider PE together with its expected rate of increase in profit.

There is a term called PEG ratio = PE / (expected rate of incre ... [/quote]

mm....ic...I also want to know that, is "dividend" also a major factor for you to consider this kind of stock?

[quote]原帖由 [i]Dave1968[/i] 於 2006-8-31 01:26 PM 發表


mm....ic...I also want to know that, is "dividend" also a major factor for you to consider this kind of stock? [/quote]

Some stock valuation methods also state that we can consider dividend instead of earning when calculating the "reasonable value" of the stock.

[url=http://www.moneychimp.com/articles/valuation/stockvalue.htm]http://www.moneychimp.com/articles/valuation/stockvalue.htm[/url]

I think this is very true, especially under the current accounting system.  Earning may come from re-valuation of properties and a low PE is obtained only because of the re-valuation.  Dividend may reflect the company's performance better.

yl_cheng,:applause::applause:

[quote]原帖由 [i]yl_cheng[/i] 於 2006-8-31 01:58 PM 發表


Some stock valuation methods also state that we can consider dividend instead of earning when calculating the "reasonable value" of the stock.

[url]http://www.moneychimp.com/articles/va[/url] ... [/quote]

Big thanks!

[quote]原帖由 [i]213[/i] 於 2006-8-24 06:24 AM 發表
各位點看這隻股啊！匯豐會否慢慢揪大佢呀！5元樓下入得嗎？:bow: [/quote]
I prefer this one to #939 and #3988. :D:verygood:

[quote]原帖由 [i]cumine[/i] 於 2006-8-27 05:30 PM 發表
$5 樓下可以一試 [/quote]
但係$5既阻力好大播，試沖幾次都唔成功