lwy1314 2010-12-23 13:39
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 13:39
[quote]原帖由 [i]中山樵[/i] 於 2010-12-23 13:33 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162646&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
唔好講到我對珍妮同紫盈咁差:Q
我係真心欣賞珍妮嘅內涵同紫盈嘅可愛架:loveliness: [/quote]
How can you judge Jenny's connotation when you don't even know her? ;P
lwy1314 2010-12-23 13:40
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
lwy1314 2010-12-23 13:43
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
richard07 2010-12-23 13:44
[quote]原帖由 [i]中山樵[/i] 於 2010-12-23 13:33 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162646&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
唔好講到我對珍妮同紫盈咁差:Q
我係真心欣賞珍妮嘅內涵同紫盈嘅可愛架:loveliness: [/quote]
講實力
珍妮的確很好..
和文采不相百仲!!
你應該把2人平排..
但紫盈實力明顯較她們弱..
你不能單憑她的可愛
而把排得比文采前!!:Q
lwy1314 2010-12-23 13:46
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 13:48
[quote]原帖由 [i]richard07[/i] 於 2010-12-23 13:44 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162716&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
講實力
珍妮的確很好..
和文采不相百仲!!
你應該把2人平排..
但紫盈實力明顯較她們弱..
你不能單憑她的可愛
而把排得比文采前!!:Q [/quote]
Why not? No contradiction at all. In fact, Jenny's English oral is far away from being consider as a native speaker.
lwy1314 2010-12-23 13:51
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
lwy1314 2010-12-23 13:55
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
richard07 2010-12-23 13:56
[quote]原帖由 [i]Harbaugh[/i] 於 2010-12-23 13:48 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162735&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Why not? No contradiction at all. In fact, Jenny's English oral is far away from being consider as a native speaker. [/quote]
According to 中山's point of view, he ranks all of anchors bases on their talent and strength basis!! Do you think that Wendy's talent is weaker than Jenny?? Connie's talent is better than Wendy?? If you think that is true, I will accept your point of view!!
[[i] 本帖最後由 richard07 於 2010-12-23 14:18 編輯 [/i]]
richard07 2010-12-23 13:59
[quote]原帖由 [i]donaldharryhung[/i] 於 2010-12-23 13:53 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162762&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Richard must learn as me ! Is it right? ;P [/quote]
Which part I was learnt from you??
Please to clarify that!! Brother Donald!!
陳志雲 2010-12-23 14:00
回復 6341# 的帖子
都話一地有自由…
文采表現係穩定d…
不過我始終鐘意紫盈多d wo
lwy1314 2010-12-23 14:00
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 14:00
[quote]原帖由 [i]richard07[/i] 於 2010-12-23 13:56 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162789&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
According to 中山's point of view, he ranks all of anchors bases on their talent and strength basis!! Do you think that Wendy's talent is lesser then Jenny?? Connie's talnet is better than Wendy?? I ... [/quote]
Wendy>Connie>Jenny
And no, I am not being bias.
[[i] 本帖最後由 Harbaugh 於 2010-12-23 14:03 編輯 [/i]]
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 14:02
[quote]原帖由 [i]lwy1314[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:00 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162828&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Black is your Spelling Mistake
Red is your Grammar Mistake [/quote]
You missed 2 more grammatical mistakes.
richard07 2010-12-23 14:02
[quote]原帖由 [i]lwy1314[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:00 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162828&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Black is your Spelling Mistake
Red is your Grammar Mistake [/quote]
Please help me to correct it !!
Thx!!
Especially, the red word path!!
lwy1314 2010-12-23 14:04
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 14:04
According to 中山's point of view, he ranks all of anchors based on their talent and strength!! Do you think that Wendy's talent is weaker then Jenny?? Connie's talent is better than Wendy?? If you think that is true, I will accept your point of view!!
richard07 2010-12-23 14:05
[quote]原帖由 [i]donaldharryhung[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:01 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162843&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Yeah, please improve your English Grammer skills, richard!:lol [/quote]
I will! They can remind me when I have grammatical mistakes!!
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 14:05
[quote]原帖由 [i]lwy1314[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:04 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162865&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
The Black is just because you are typing too fast
The Red,just cross out "er" [/quote]
"er" is required when comparing.
richard07 2010-12-23 14:06
[quote]原帖由 [i]Harbaugh[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:04 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162871&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
According to 中山's point of view, he ranks all of anchors based on their talent and strength!! Do you think that Wendy's talent is weaker then Jenny?? Connie's talent is better than Wendy?? If you th ... [/quote]
That's right!!
You help me a lot!!
Thx again!!
richard07 2010-12-23 14:07
[quote]原帖由 [i]Harbaugh[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:05 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162876&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
"er" is required when comparing. [/quote]
I know that!!
But sometimes I maybe using it incorrectly!!
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 14:07
[quote]原帖由 [i]richard07[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:06 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162883&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
That's right!!
You help me a lot!!
Thx again!! [/quote]
Dammit! I miss the "then" part...
According to 中山's point of view, he ranks all of anchors based on their talent and strength!! Do you think that Wendy's talent is weaker[b] than[/b] Jenny?? Connie's talent is better than Wendy?? If you think that is true, I will accept your point of view!!
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 14:09
[quote]原帖由 [i]richard07[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:07 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162893&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
I know that!!
But sometimes I may used it incorrectly!! [/quote]
By the way, you don't need to put an exclamation mark after each sentence. :L
lwy1314 2010-12-23 14:11
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 14:13
[quote]原帖由 [i]lwy1314[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:11 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162919&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
But Basicially,
The word"less" itself is a comparing word
We call it a "comparative" word
Just like we say 紫盈 is More beautiful than someone
we never and we can't say 紫盈 is Moreer beautiful ... [/quote]
More is not a verb...:L
lwy1314 2010-12-23 14:14
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
richard07 2010-12-23 14:15
[quote]原帖由 [i]Harbaugh[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:09 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162902&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
By the way, you don't need to put an exclamation mark after each sentence. :L [/quote]
I will remind that!! I will replace all of exclamation marks as full stop.
richard07 2010-12-23 14:16
[quote]原帖由 [i]Harbaugh[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:07 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162895&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Dammit! I miss the "then" part...
According to 中山's point of view, he ranks all of anchors based on their talent and strength!! Do you think that Wendy's talent is weaker than Jenny?? Connie' ... [/quote]
I have corrected it!!
Please see!!
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 14:18
[quote]原帖由 [i]lwy1314[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:11 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13162919&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
But Basicially,
The word"less" itself is a comparing word
We call it a "comparative" word in a professional way
Just like we say 紫盈 is More beautiful than someone
we never and we can't say 紫盈 ... [/quote]
Come on now... "X is more weak than Y" is not technically correct, the proper way is "X is weaker than Y"
lwy1314 2010-12-23 14:26
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
richard07 2010-12-23 14:37
[quote]原帖由 [i]中山樵[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:32 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13163107&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
其實嘛…
你話Karen、珍妮同文采，佢地是但一個嘅才幹同實力，有冇明顯凌駕其餘兩人？
所以要計排名，除左外形，真係冇咩其他準則啦
當然，珍妮咁啱有個機會俾我地知道佢嘅內涵，因此我排佢 ... [/quote]
你又要睇到文采做live, 仲要做即時翻譯可以同珍妮同level或比佢好先可以升返佢上去!!:Q
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 14:37
[quote]原帖由 [i]lwy1314[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:26 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13163061&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
An important rule that you must remind;
If the word includes more than three or more syllables, just like beau-ti-ful, im-por-tant
we must add "more " or "less" before the word
And we would't ad ... [/quote]
An important thing you need to remember:
We are talking about Richard's post:
According to 中山's point of view, he ranks all of anchors based on their talent and strength!! Do you think that Wendy's talent is weaker than Jenny?? Connie's talent is better than Wendy?? If you think that is true, I will accept your point of view!!
Your response is:
[quote]原帖由 lwy1314 於 2010-12-23 14:04 發表
The Black is just because you are typing too fast
The Red,just cross out "er" [/quote]
The [color=Red]Red[/color] = less.
[b]The word we are discussing about is "less" not "beautiful" [/b]
[color=Blue][b]Less is a one syllable word, it does not contain three syllables, so the proper way is "lesser" mot "more less". [/b][/color]
richard07 2010-12-23 14:42
[quote]原帖由 [i]中山樵[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:37 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13163141&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Jenny showed her thoughtfulness with her blog articles.:victory:
She praised the love between Liu Xiaobo and Liu Xia after she had finished the live broadcast of the ceremony of the nobel peace ... [/quote]
This is a reason of Jenny can be the no.2??
As her political standpoint of China??
richard07 2010-12-23 14:44
[quote]原帖由 [i]中山樵[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:38 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13163152&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
其實我覺得嗰次live珍妮做得唔算好好，Jagland有啲好重要嘅說話，珍妮都冇譯到
令我欣賞珍妮嘅，係佢做完個live後寫嘅blog文 [/quote]
即係我下面回果個post一樣!!
係係基於佢政治立場..
同情劉生劉太被大陸阻止出席諾貝爾頒發禮!!
lwy1314 2010-12-23 14:49
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 15:02
:loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes:
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 15:06
[quote]原帖由 [i]lwy1314[/i] 於 2010-12-23 14:49 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13163256&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
容許我用中文打
"LESS"本身係一個"比較式"既詞語
佢唔會亦都唔可以+ er [/quote]
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Lesser
:loveliness:
If "less" is a "比較式"既詞語, then "big" has to be also a "比較式"既詞語. If "比較式"既詞語 can't + er then the word "bigger" should not exist. :loveliness:
lwy1314 2010-12-23 15:08
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 15:11
[quote]原帖由 [i]lwy1314[/i] 於 2010-12-23 15:08 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13163385&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
the website is blank:loveliness:
你可以問下中山兄
less 後面加er得唔得 [/quote]
Come on now....:loveliness:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/lesser
http://cdict.net/q/lesser
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lesser
Nice try though....:loveliness:
lwy1314 2010-12-23 15:13
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 15:19
[quote]原帖由 [i]lwy1314[/i] 於 2010-12-23 15:13 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13163424&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
都係問下中山兄 [/quote]
Not necessary but let see what he says then.
0000000 2010-12-23 15:27
23/12/2010 互動新聞台新聞報道
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 15:28
[quote]原帖由 [i]中山樵[/i] 於 2010-12-23 15:26 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13163516&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
其實原句係咩？ [/quote]
The question he was asking:
Is there a word in the whole universe that called "lesser"?
lwy1314 2010-12-23 15:29
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
陳志雲 2010-12-23 15:29
今日睇inews好唔方便:L :L :L
雯雯今日著黑色衫:verygood: 好靚女:loveeyes: 今日未報天氣都覺得佢好靚:loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes:
lwy1314 2010-12-23 15:31
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
lwy1314 2010-12-23 15:31
*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
Harbaugh 2010-12-23 15:32
[quote]原帖由 [i]lwy1314[/i] 於 2010-12-23 15:31 發表 [url=http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=13163555&ptid=62821][img]http://forum.timway.com/f/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
i Know:loveliness:
But is it "lesser than " instead of "Less than" when we making comparaion [/quote]
Yes. No doubt about it.
陳志雲 2010-12-23 15:34
回復 6401# 的帖子
去吹水區傾la…越講越遠了