WADE 2006-8-24 01:09
睇今年Anthony打 NBA&世錦賽 真係越黎越有味道~佢唔似JAMES,WADE 咁用體能打波,而係用中距離&技術黎FAKE過人,如果佢可以再改變自己打波既心態佢既成就應該唔會低過 JAMES&WADE~~
睇今年Anthony打 NBA&世錦賽 真係越黎越有味道~佢唔似JAMES,WADE 咁用體能打波,而係用中距離&技術黎FAKE過人,如果佢可以再改變自己打波既心態佢既成就應該唔會低過 JAMES&WADE~~
3人特色不同，ＬＢＪ係種爆發性切入，然後黎個大力入樽。
Ｗａｄｅ係瞬間切入另對方無法防守。
Anthony係中距離穩定型的得分
[[i] 本帖最後由 WADE 於 2006-8-24 01:24 AM 編輯 [/i]]
johncage 2006-8-24 09:43
[img]http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/apple/20060824/large/AA06_01_a.gif[/img]
tungpo 2006-8-24 10:01
中國終於贏番一場。不過，上半場打得真係好一般。
johncage 2006-8-24 23:31
王仕鵬完場前一刻射入三分波！中國出線！:applause::applause::applause:
johncage 2006-8-25 10:21
[img]http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/apple/20060825/large/AA08_01_a.gif[/img]
法拉利 2006-8-25 10:32
2008中国也不一定打过美国，如果想赢美国，一定要有一个很好的三分投手。还有有很好的配合。
justforfun 2006-8-26 02:07
USA VS Greece!!!
what a game!!!
drili 2006-8-27 14:28
I SAID ONCE AGAIN NO ONE CAN BEAT DREM TEAM.TODAY DREAM TEAM WIN 113:73 AUSTRILA OVER 40 POINT. ALL OF YOU DONT BE SILLY AR.
tungpo 2006-8-27 16:06
美國隊始終欠高大中鋒及準繩三分射手，面對西班牙或阿根庭都相當難打。
pkyoyo6406 2006-8-27 20:37
沒錯 有信心就會贏 我支持 台灣 台灣 加油><.......
johncage 2006-8-28 10:03
[quote]原帖由 [i]tungpo[/i] 於 2006-8-27 04:06 PM 發表
美國隊始終欠高大中鋒及準繩三分射手，面對西班牙或阿根庭都相當難打。 [/quote]
對澳洲三分球，27投14中！
過5成！:verygood::verygood::verygood:
tungpo 2006-8-28 10:44
係囉，對澳洲咋！
OrangeFai 2006-8-28 12:43
[quote]原帖由 [i]drili[/i] 於 2006-8-27 02:28 PM 發表
I SAID ONCE AGAIN NO ONE CAN BEAT DREM TEAM.TODAY DREAM TEAM WIN 113:73 AUSTRILA OVER 40 POINT. ALL OF YOU DONT BE SILLY AR. [/quote]
how silly you are!:L
justforfun 2006-8-29 01:59
German is tough, i guess USA win within 15 pts
johncage 2006-8-29 17:15
89:67
西班牙贏立陶宛！
入四強！
acezz 2006-8-29 18:43
I like greece.
johncage 2006-8-29 19:51
阿根廷勝土耳其
83比58
[[i] 本帖最後由 johncage 於 2006-8-29 08:12 PM 編輯 [/i]]
tungpo 2006-8-29 20:13
阿根廷對西班牙，精彩可期！
drili 2006-8-30 11:13
IN 90TH CHICAGO BULL HAD NO CENTRE TOO BUT THEY WILL SIX CHAMPHIONSHIP IN NBA. NO BEST CENTRE ARE NOT THE MAIN POINT TO WIN THE GAME.
tungpo 2006-8-30 11:24
哦？請問公牛隊之後贏NBA的球隊有邊隊無一個好中鋒？
三連冠的湖人及本屆冠軍熱火有奧尼爾，馬刺有大衛羅賓遜同鄧肯﹝你可以話佢係大前鋒不過唔係成日囉﹞，底特律有老Ben。
就算九十年代，連奪兩屆冠軍的火箭都係靠奧拉祖雲！
justforfun 2006-8-30 14:50
[quote]原帖由 [i]tungpo[/i] 於 2006-8-29 08:13 PM 發表
阿根廷對西班牙，精彩可期！ [/quote]
i bet 阿根廷
johncage 2006-8-30 17:17
希臘贏法國！
73:56!
半場美國領先一分！
[[i] 本帖最後由 johncage 於 2006-8-30 07:28 PM 編輯 [/i]]
johncage 2006-8-30 20:04
第三節美國發力，領先15分！安東尼！讚！:verygood::verygood::verygood:
85:65!
藍版，偷波贏哂！
[[i] 本帖最後由 johncage 於 2006-8-30 08:28 PM 編輯 [/i]]
tungpo 2006-8-30 20:36
安東尼好浪射喎，頭兩節命中率簡直慘不忍睹。德國輸平均質素，但都打咗兩節好波。
justforfun 2006-8-30 22:15
美國贏20分！
johncage 2006-8-30 22:40
[quote]原帖由 [i]tungpo[/i] 於 2006-8-30 08:36 PM 發表
安東尼好浪射喎，頭兩節命中率簡直慘不忍睹。德國輸平均質素，但都打咗兩節好波。 [/quote]
wade係第二節尾偷完波，
單刀抄粉之後仲食左一野，
果度來回唔見6分！
好在第三節回魂。
drili 2006-8-30 23:28
Rocket win champhionship in 93-94, 94-95 but dont forget that two year chiago without michael jordan. When Michael back Olajuwon had no chance to win. In 80th Boston win 81, 84, 86 that team also no real best center Larry bird is key man in the team. Pistons,ok you know 1988-1990 Joe Dumars, Dennis Rodman,Isiah Thomas leads Pistons to win this two years. they beat the one of the best center Abdul-Jabbar of the Los Angeles in NBA. Where the best are? What the best are? And please becare what i said i just said that no best or real center are not the ((((important)))) factors to win the champhionship. I havent say (((((must))))).
justforfun 2006-8-30 23:41
US 85 : Germany 65
Rebound: US 48 : Germany 29
turnover: US 13 : Germany 24
Steal: US 10 : Germany 2
great defense play by US!
yang12 2006-8-31 13:48
不可能
两个队的差距太大了
tungpo 2006-8-31 14:01
[quote]原帖由 [i]drili[/i] 於 2006-8-30 11:28 PM 發表
Rocket win champhionship in 93-94, 94-95 but dont forget that two year chiago without michael jordan. When Michael back Olajuwon had no chance to win. In 80th Boston win 81, 84, 86 that team also n ... [/quote]
哦，important呀，我都係咁講。
你都識講，芝加哥無米高佐敦，所以火箭可以贏兩屆。咁，請問歷史上有幾多個米高佐敦？又，火箭贏冠軍個兩屆，對手都有頂級中鋒，分別係伊榮同奧尼爾。而在佐敦正式退休後，全部總冠軍球隊都有個好中鋒。如此，應該可以說明當無咗百年一見的籃球之神時，一級中鋒係球隊奪冠的重要因素啦！
呀，唔記得講埋，火箭攞第二次冠軍時，佐敦有替公牛打季後賽，輸俾擁有頂級中鋒奧尼爾的魔術出局。當然，個時佐敦狀態唔好。
[[i] 本帖最後由 tungpo 於 2006-8-31 02:02 PM 編輯 [/i]]
OrangeFai 2006-8-31 14:59
[quote]原帖由 [i]drili[/i] 於 2006-8-30 11:13 AM 發表
IN 90TH CHICAGO BULL HAD NO CENTRE TOO BUT THEY WILL SIX CHAMPHIONSHIP IN NBA. NO BEST CENTRE ARE NOT THE MAIN POINT TO WIN THE GAME. [/quote]
好好地就咁講咪得囉, 唔好話人地silly之類！
drili 2006-8-31 16:13
IN 80th can beat the best center Abdul-Jabbar have PIstons & Boston in ten years they seperate win the champhionship. Lakers four times,Boston three times & Pistons two times that can explain not best center didnt most important factors to win. when Michael retired 98-06 how many MVP was center to award. And 80-90 how many MVP was center to award. AT the beginging,in this time except Wilt Chamberlain & Kareem Abdul-Jabbar had more three times in nba. AS you said Shaquille O'Neal, Hakeem Olajuwon & David Robinson they just got one or two times MVP. I like Michael. BUT if can beat the best center is god.Then Larry bird, Isiah Thomas & Joe Dumars they all are god.
tungpo 2006-8-31 16:24
再講之前，都係引返我句最早期原文先：
「美國隊始終欠高大中鋒及準繩三分射手，面對西班牙或阿根庭都相當難打。」
決賽美國應該會對西班牙或阿根廷，大家不妨睇睇我講得啱唔啱。不過，對德國個場頭兩節都反映到個問題。
另，乜去到講MVP啦？我只係想重申，後米高佐敦時代，冠軍都係有一級中鋒的球隊。
drili 2006-8-31 16:38
I support you say dream team havent got a good center & three poins shooters. But i dont think they will hard to beat it in this factors. They really face the problem are miss a lot of shoot. IN German this game they had a good defence & a little bit lucky. If they lose all these thing i think they will hard to face Greece. They need to improve their shoot. I trust they can do better & great. And also say sorry to Orange+Fai i didnt say again.
johncage 2006-8-31 18:08
中鋒問題！
以前80's就會有大既幫助，
依家各國身高高左好多，
7尺球員大有人在，
戰術上亦多變化，
進攻模式多左，
中鋒影響力同作用既減低！
tungpo 2006-8-31 18:15
依家係多咗好多身材幾高的swingman，不過中鋒仍很有價值，特別係NBA季後賽。小馬輸俾熱火，其中一個原因係班中鋒頂唔住奧尼爾。
又，美國隊無乜七呎高人喎。成日出場的侯活6呎11，白蘭特更不過6呎8。
johncage 2006-8-31 18:21
越來越多球隊用run & gun打法，要求速度，三分外圍投射！
相比起80's簡單打法中鋒係影响力小左！
好似KG係中鋒身高，
但打法就係前鋒，靈活又快！
奧尼爾對住太陽，
就起唔到威力！
[[i] 本帖最後由 johncage 於 2006-8-31 06:22 PM 編輯 [/i]]
gggbbb 2006-8-31 19:01
不关怎么样, 美国对还是很强的!! 就看他们自己打的好不好而已!! 他们打的好就赢定了!!
drili 2006-8-31 20:02
Every patten haver their avantage or disavantage. Depends on center will strong the team oppose they also lose the speed. However cant say that whose true or false. But the Dream team problem is, oh i should say that all the Dream team(except team one) have a most serious problem is missing a lot of shoot. Also they cant concetrate to play the game. Some injured time they missing one of the man who can shoot the last shoot. I mean the last shoot is who can no missing the shoot. Unfortunately, they all missing so we can say that why Olympic Games in Athens 2004 they lost. In fact 2000 Olympic Games had a danger sign.But they didnt improve so lost 2004.
tungpo 2006-8-31 20:56
[quote]原帖由 [i]johncage[/i] 於 2006-8-31 06:21 PM 發表
越來越多球隊用run & gun打法，要求速度，三分外圍投射！
相比起80's簡單打法中鋒係影响力小左！
好似KG係中鋒身高，
但打法就係前鋒，靈活又快！
奧尼爾對住太陽，
就起唔到威力！ [/quote]
KG係靈活又快，但木狼多年來都希望找個一級中鋒以爭取更好成績卻是鐵一般事實。之所以當年錯買奧路雲根迪。同樣，小馬有魯域斯基，但亦很積極想找個好中鋒，高薪聘丹比亞正基於此。
木狼第一次打入西岸決賽，結果敗給湖人，正由於無中鋒頂住奧尼爾。小馬今屆總決賽亦一樣。
tungpo 2006-8-31 20:57
[quote]原帖由 [i]drili[/i] 於 2006-8-31 08:02 PM 發表
Every patten haver their avantage or disavantage. Depends on center will strong the team oppose they also lose the speed. However cant say that whose true or false. But the Dream team problem is, o ... [/quote]
美國隊根本沒有一個射三分準的。
chencctv 2006-8-31 21:00
西班牙
一定得
johncage 2006-8-31 22:20
[quote]原帖由 [i]tungpo[/i] 於 2006-8-31 08:57 PM 發表
美國隊根本沒有一個射三分準的。 [/quote]
錯了！
對澳洲是27射，14中！
軒力治，保羅，祖兒莊信，
上場連bosh都射入！:verygood::verygood::verygood:
k教練所教既係整體，
11名球員轉流上陣(上場除左米拿)，
ncaa係打淘汰賽，
k教練最熟此家！
同奧運布朗教練用7-8個球員不同，
唔識利用美國隊優勢(後備力量)！
安東尼打出爭氣波！:verygood::verygood::verygood:
証明布朗唔用佢係錯！
tungpo 2006-8-31 22:48
如果容許安東尼好似對德國頭兩節咁射，啲三分有幾準？唔好成日用對弱旅澳洲做標準。
[[i] 本帖最後由 tungpo 於 2006-8-31 10:51 PM 編輯 [/i]]
johncage 2006-8-31 23:03
當然係要獨立睇每一場比賽！
drili 2006-9-1 03:59
Let me say something dream team is special team. They dont need every post have a wondrull guy to role it. They dont limited their post. Center must Center,Three points shooter must shoot three point,because they all have a wonderull skill . it havent got in the other nation. That why they call dream team,every single post can role more one post.This is the main pont why they dont need a wonderful center.If they play the pattern same another contury, i think they will worse for today. I remember 96-98 western final was seattle & utah jazz but they also havent got wonderfull center.Utah jazz even beat Shaquille O'Neal of the lakers. And one more thing Michael jordan win champhionship that six years who match up the best centers O'Neal, Olajuwon,Patrick Ewing & David Robinson. Michael jordan match them? no. because Chicago have a wondrful, strong & powerful forward Dennis Rodman.He suceessful cool down their offence & also got the rebounds. He just only 6'8 tall.They can win another reason is coach. So dream team dont worry about the post.They should improve their shoot & coach k how to arrange his team.
tungpo 2006-9-1 09:12
我覺得，如果當今地上最強的高比仔係度，就會好啲。
johncage 2006-9-1 16:51
死火！輸得！
要放下心理包服！
加油！:applause::applause:
[[i] 本帖最後由 johncage 於 2006-9-1 05:02 PM 編輯 [/i]]
johncage 2006-9-1 17:28
年青美國隊有希望！08加油！
justforfun 2006-9-1 17:30
Greece 101 : USA 95