有這個必要嗎
簡直損人不利己

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2011-8-11 23:35 編輯 ]

In theory, as I said, you do have freedom of expression here, but if one of the service personnel (including PRs, bgs, beauticians, waiters/esses, etc)does not have a service/attitude problem, do you have to laugh at him/her simply because their look do not please you?There is a subtle difference bewteen a candid statement,' I do not like her look' and'her look   still there?' which borders on ridicule.As for  criticisms, from time to time don't we have in this thread complaints about service of locker guys and even PR/management here?I myself have expressed dissatisfaction with a few areas in the past.Since you have not provoked argument or gone so far as to inflict harm on the safety of bg/member of staff here, at least up to now.you are left in peace, as it were, when our exchange on this issue is over, when I have criticised you just as you have criticised me.However, you distorted what I said in private reply to you (and the content of private communicationis not supposed to be revealed without the agreement of the other party).In reply I said: 'Continue to exchange info with old, established members like...(examples)I did not say, ' Exchange with the people I like (the word like would mean differently from above)It was you who asked me for advice/idea, and in your next reply you said,'Yes, I already do that.'then you distorted what I said here , and further said it was 'offensive' here,who the hell is being offensive......!? I am afraid I have to call you treacherous. You committed a 'breach of trust' and distortion of meaning.For this reason, I cannot but deduct marks off you.And I know well that you told a lie towards the end of your post, which I will not reveal for privacy's sake.

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2011-8-12 09:03 編輯 ]

I regret that I will not delete my previous post re: Carmanlamlam, though I said I wanted to, for reasons clear enough.

While carmanlamlam is left in peace, I have banned 分文, who has on more than one occasion
attempted to provoke argument and/or make false, ungrounded accusations.
His last attempt before this one in this thread was made in the current thread on Sauna Lotto.
This time here, apart from making a false, grounded accusation, he even encouraged a fellow member
to violate forum rule.

  Just came for learning!

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Sorry, in a hurry before my morning's work, I carelessly, really carelessly, wrote in carmanlamlam's post instead of writing a separate new post of mine. I have removed my words there and now copy them below.'

It isn't necesary to  make big this    '....before disclosing something sent in privately',
because it is plain that the chain of events are:
1. you PM me for advice, or claiming t0 ask for my advice
2. I advised/strongly requested you
3. you replied: "Yes, I already do that' (when the real case is....., which means you could have been 'testing me')
3. Then you revealed this, and distorted what I said in private, adding your own little elaboration with symbols like..
4. Then when I dissuaded you from saying what you have said in your previous post ( nothing to do with PM), you wrongfully accused me of being offensive in my PM reply to you, hence doing injustice to me.
Enuf said.
Brothers, let's go back on the track of the thread.

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2011-8-16 09:53 編輯 ]

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Yes, but I do exercise self-restraint from abusing this power. If I had not, I would have edited
your first responding post to mine (yesterday). But I didn't. That shows this morning I did not wilfully
edit your second responding post, but did so carelessly. I should have put on my glasses.

最近和美容師好傾咗 , 心境年輕咗 ＊

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

young at heart.

Yes.

她的頭髮後面中間束起了, 好看

馬尾美人，肯定精神*

今日見另一條匙 ?

之後請報告.

昨沒遇上她，明週一重現 *

我可能周一或二.

咦  有皮蛋牛肉粥 ＊

[ 本帖最後由 SPA愛上她 於 2011-8-14 21:17 編輯 ]

新一代 28 , 有把長秀髲 ＊

做左啦? 仲有流海.

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

'

昨日BB試埋另一條匙.

有冇做埋磨沙呀 ？