推介:| 股票報價 | 股票分析 | 証券經紀公司 | 投資課程 | CFP 課程 | 財經資訊 | 財經顧問 | 基金投資 | 物業代理 | 融資 | 樓宇按揭 |

發新話題
打印

SOHO一手中籤率傳60%

Small amt of subscription can get 1 lot, it means it is not favourable for those who subscribe many but still in Group A.

TOP

I put $5M so I am in Group B, so it is not affecting me for the Group A policy. But hopefully the situation in Group B is not that worse.

TOP

For large scale of IPO, put yourself in Group B so u can avoid the unfair policy like one man one lot or two man one lot.
引用:
原帖由 potatogundam 於 2007-10-3 14:36 發表


It's a bad news for me.

I used margin to apply this stock

TOP

Understand. But Group B is more fair than Group A.

In the most recent allocation in Group B, the hitting rate across Group B is the same. It means if u put more $ in, u will get more shares in the same percentage of others.
引用:
原帖由 dejavu2003 於 2007-10-3 16:51 發表


The problem with Group B is that the percentage is on the whole lower than Group A.  Having said that, if you have unlimited resources, you should always go for Group B as the absolute allocati ...

TOP

Understand and agree to spit into more in Group B. But all my close relatives do subscribe new shares and there is no spare account for me to use. There should be more eyes to look at if one applies more than one applications.
引用:
原帖由 dejavu2003 於 2007-10-3 17:19 發表


But in terms of percentage, group A at any level is better than group B.  Therefore, with limited resources, one should split up the money into two or three group A than having one group B.  
...

TOP

發新話題


重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,本網站對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。本討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。


Copyright 1997- Xocat. All Right Reserved.