I just took 屈's reply as a joke, just as I take many other statements on our forum. In paticular, there are simply so many around the 'chat' zones.

The phrase 'inside story' 內幕could be interpreted liberally, and I didn't give a damn.

Of course, one is free to voice his/her query here.

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-5 11:35 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 loksiu 於 2007-7-5 11:18 發表

If you really didn't give a damn, why bother to explain in here?

My response to an issue, not an explanation for others.

引用:

原帖由 mtr613 於 2007-7-5 11:18 發表


一個 JOKE 字 就可推得一乾二淨 ?

My taking it as a joke doesn't equal a response from 屈. My response is how I saw/perceived 屈's statement, not made on his behalf.
I could be wrong, in which case it would turn out there was an 'inside story'.

You could wait for 屈 to respond, if ever. Anybody else's response does not
preempt/substitute for his.

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-5 11:28 編輯 ]

咁睇番成條thread, 白版主無提過有內幕, 話有內幕係另有其人......似乎, 要出黎解釋究竟有咩內幕既...應該係另一個人.........

引用:

原帖由 loksiu 於 2007-7-5 11:33 發表

I thought he didn't give a damn....

But I feel somewhat interested now that it is taken up.

Note the shift from the simple past to the simple present tense.

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-5 11:39 編輯 ]

「內幕」一詞，好易令人有唔少聯想。例如「買」呀，「賣」呀，等。

當然，呢個論壇既由商業機構運作，那牽涉金錢並無問題。不過，就應公開公平公正。即係，若版主或moderator之類職位可以合法「交易」，唔該開張price list，等一般會員可以競投。

１

引用:

原帖由 oldgun 於 2007-7-5 11:45 發表


呢�曮}叫叻唔切，飛撲出�襄捃凗o！
咦！莫非..........................

Any reading member is free to state his/her interpretation/opinion, not least me to whom the remark in question was originally addressed. It so happens that I saw this thread early (before others to come in later), and had the time to write a bit. Members come in and leave threads spontaneously, or 'jump in(and out)' to use your words.
'叻唔切'?  What an assumption! Or could I say the one who assumes so is so himself (to borrow his words again)?

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-5 13:24 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 mtr613 於 2007-7-5 11:05 發表
以下對話, 節錄自交女友....聊聊天



再幼戊?honeysugar 榮任版主 thread 內所寫 :



根據時間推斷, 白貓兒所講的宗親,

好明顯係談論梗, 當時仍未被屈臣氏割V的 honeysugar !

而屈臣氏回應白貓 ...

我都好想聽聽合理的解釋
「有好多內幕既」
這句話出自一位moderator之口
再加上honeysugar事件
令人感到這個論壇有些不可告人的事情

引用:

原帖由 mtr613 於 2007-7-5 11:18 發表


一個 JOKE 字 就可推得一乾二淨 ?

便秘夠要食多啲粥先疴得一乾二淨啦

引用:

原帖由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-5 11:56 發表
１

Any reading member is free to state his/her interpretation/opinion, not least me to whom the remark in question was originally addressed. It so happens that I saw this thread early (before ot ...

唔係好明點解要一而再咁修訂你既回復呢~~~~~

引用:

原帖由 loksiu 於 2007-7-5 13:31 發表

如果係電腦上來講, 會係RAM唔夠.

ok...thanks for explaination.....如果用上面長毛既說話黎講, 就係痾屎痾唔出, 要逐粒必......am i right???

When is 屈 going to explain?

各會員當然有他們的知情權, 而現在版主mtr613 有禮貌提問到, 我亦樂意交待文中所指
但同時, 我亦希望版主mtr613 詳明如何演釋「公器私用」一詞, 避免再有誤解

1.當日6/20 10:46 AM 本人所指「有好多內幕既」並沒有提到什麼「交易」我不明白版主mtr613 為何會聯想到「內幕」=「交易」??
在一聊天 thread 內所講說話 (泛指無聊吹水) 閣下當時認為是認真時, 為何有疑問而選擇不發問呢??
而事實是指另一 Moderator johncage 在 allureland (Post#4922) 留言指 honeysugar 申請版主, 希望大家支持
本人同時間發出兩個 PM, 一個係比版主 Allure (2007-6-18 00:45) 另一個係比 xocat (2007-6-18 00:52)
表明我對該申請有意見及保留, 希望各人可參考意見, 此舉可能有干擾各人決定的嫌疑, 但是否所謂「公器私用」大家容後討論


2.後來 6/19 18:22 收到 xocat 回覆「done, thanks」看附圖 PM, 最終也沒有同意我的睇法



3.至於 6/19 23:38 在「恭喜 honeysugar 榮任版主」一文留言, 如 會員 messenger「是因感受到她的熱誠」而給予祝賀
跟「不可告人內幕」原全拉不上關係, 或者版主mtr613 幫手解釋吧!!

註：版主mtr613 我已經用藍色 highlight 咗我既問題, 唔該你答吓我??