ªø½u = 3¦Ü5¦~

²Õ¦X:

¤j·sª÷¿Ä(440) : ¯Âºé¦]¬°¶×±±«YÊ\¤jªÑªF(¦û44%)¦P®IÊ\¦a¬J«OÀI·~°È©Ò´£¨Ñ¬J§Q¼í¼Wªø±o´X¦n¡C

¤¤°ê»È¦æ (3988)
©Ò¦³°ê¤º¬J»È¦æ¨ä¹ê§Ú³£Ú»¦n,¦ý«Y¤¤°ê»È¦æ²{»ù¦n§l¤Þ¡A¦P®I°ê¤º»È¦æªÑ¤¤Ê\pe³Ì§C, ¦ý«Y§Úı±oÊ\¦a­nºÉ§Ö´£¤ÉÊ\¦a§ë¸ê»È¦æ¤Î¨p¤H»È¦æ·~°È,¦]¬°©O­Ó«Y¤jÁͶաC

ªF¨È»È¦æ (0023):¯Â¦]ºÞ²z¼h¦n¡A¦P®Iµo®i¤º¦a»È¦æ·~°È¦n¿n·¥¡A±N¨Ó¬J¦^³ø·|¦n©M¨ý¡C

¤j®aÂIÚ»...?

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ brian.auyeung ©ó 2007-7-18 20:38 µoªí
ªø½u = 3¦Ü5¦~
²Õ¦X:
¤j·sª÷¿Ä(440) : ¯Âºé¦]¬°¶×±±«YÊ\¤jªÑªF(¦û44%)¦P®IÊ\¦a¬J«OÀI·~°È©Ò´£¨Ñ¬J§Q¼í¼Wªø±o´X¦n¡C

Why you not pick #5?

Manulife is a good choice.

66 also is the good choice too

#2628 can be a long-term choice also.

¦]¬°§Úı±oÊ\¤Ó­«½S....¦P®I¹L¥÷í©w...·íµMí©w¦³Ã­©w¦n,¦ý«Y§Ú·Q´zd¦~«Cd¬JªÑ¦n¦ü¦³½Ä«ld...¦P®Iµo®i¼ç¤O±jd.

¤p§Ì§÷²¨¾Ç²L,±æ¦U¦ì°ª¤H¤£§[½ç±Ð!

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ b4321 ©ó 2007-7-18 23:38 µoªí
Manulife is a good choice.

yes, but the cost is too high and i prefer some light weight shares.

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ cyberken ©ó 2007-7-19 01:24 µoªí
66 also is the good choice too

well, it's not bad, but in fact, MTR Corp has become a property development company.  Its profit heavily relies on revenue generated from property development.  Personally, I do not think there is much potential left in the Hong Kong property market.  therefore, I prefer to put my money elsewhere.

But thanks for the suggestion anyway.

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ jackpao ©ó 2007-7-19 12:02 µoªí
#2628 can be a long-term choice also.

Agree.  But its PE has already reached a very dangerous level and the PB is too high.  I will definitely buy some when its PE drops back to a reasonable level, e.g. below 20.

still think the market may face a major correction next year due to the Olympic anti-climax
for 3-5 years investment now is not opportune time to buy
buying stock now better aim at short term speculation of 10-20% profit only

ªÑ²¼¬O¶R¨Ó½æªº¡C¤£­n¤ÓþÓ­«¦~´Á¡A¦b¤W¤É­y¡Aü¶¦h¤[¤]¤£¥Î©È¡A¦b¤U­°­y¡A´N¤@©w­nªf¡C

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ cyberken ©ó 2007-7-19 01:24 µoªí
66 also is the good choice too

Hello - this is a property and transport stock.