推介:| 網頁寄存 | 網頁設計 | 開網店 | 電郵申請 | Wordpress Hosting | 外賣平台 | 英語課程推薦 | 風水屋 | 房間風水懷孕 | Timway Testimonial | Wedding Planner | Wedding MC |

 35 12
發新話題
打印

[原創] 緬甸僧侶反暴政示威及中國的反應........

引用:
原帖由 Rubber 於 2007-9-29 11:12 發表


你老兄咁記得 82,88 年發生翵, 咁對 89 中國 ( 四川, 北京, 上海) 等地翵々S唔提又係乜原因??  
有人話咩細學大丫嘛
要學炴N梗係後來者學前輩
邊有時光倒序 1982, 1988 年學 1989 ?

而且黃面佬門口狗又當洋主人係道德典範
可能限於學識智力又懶去查證
夠從來唔提 / 唔知佢地洋大人係以軍隊鎮壓平民先驅者

你老兄有空閑又有興趣就上英文 wiki 查下 :

May 4 massacre -大佬即係大佬, 連月份都要比六四早一個月
又稱為 Kent State shootings
再早 d 就有 鐵血將軍巴頓坐鎮 Bonus March  

TOP

引用:
原帖由 hardcat 於 2007-9-29 11:47 發表


This is a very naive point of view... actually the congression and the white house have been very cooperative to each other... time and again, they side with the corporate and the rich.. and fl ...
所以上海佬大隻江有句狪堶痟靺攳u係好合適又到肉
Too simple , sometimes naive

TOP

引用:
原帖由 hardcat 於 2007-9-29 11:47 發表


This is a very naive point of view... actually the congression and the white house have been very cooperative to each other... time and again, they side with the corporate and the rich.. and fl ...
你都不能否認共和黨失去眾議院的控制權後的確需要同民主黨協議,我所指的制衡就是這點!
而此制衡是從何而來?不是美國軍方發動政變而來,而是由美國人的選票而來的!
「沒有國家,人仍可活下去;但沒有了人,國家也就不存在了。」
「國家這個東西本身不過是一種道具。只要能不忘記這件事,大概就可以維持住理智吧!」
∼∼《銀河英雄傳說》楊威利

TOP

引用:
原帖由 飛毛腿 於 2007-9-29 12:16 發表


有人話咩細學大丫嘛
要學№就梗係後來者學前輩
邊有時光倒序 1982, 1988 年學 1989 ?

而且黃面佬門口狗又當洋主人係道德典範
可能限於學識智力又懶去查證
夠從來唔提 / 唔知佢地洋大人係以軍隊鎮壓 ...
哦, 多謝資料, 真係死咗四個人咁多都稱 Kent state massacre..
洋大人的人命真係值錢..

唔怪得天朝大大國..
  1976年 4月 5日 又唔使提...  
  1989年 6月 4日 又唔使提..
  更加唔應該講係屠城...  皆因中國人命比蟻賤 ?  
The unexamined life is not worth living - Socrates
以銅為鏡,可以正衣冠,以史為鏡,可以知興替,以人為鏡,可以明得失 - 唐太宗

TOP

老豆都管唔到嗰仔做乜啦 叫中國去管緬甸做嘢 講嗰個都儍儍地

TOP

近既唔講講遠既, 不如講黃帝打蚩尤, 或者桀紂之流啦, 唔0岩黎個秦始皇焚書坑儒, 邊個祖宗殺得平民多呀?
小小寰球,有幾個蒼蠅碰壁。
嗡嗡叫,幾聲淒厲,幾聲抽泣。


我唔係版主, 無權亂講野, 講錯分分鐘俾人ban


TOP

引用:
原帖由 港奸剋星 於 2007-9-27 22:58 發表
依家中共擺明係「向外勃起」就真
明眼人都睇到以民主陣營為首的國家企圖令到緬甸翻天成為民主國家
中共偏偏唱反調,就知道兩個極權實體做緊咩喇
我真係唔明,美國近年流行親自出兵解散放別國人民
偏偏緬甸、中國 ...
因為美國“解放緬甸”完全得唔利益,所以呢,制裁下就算gar lar

TOP

引用:
原帖由 albtkl2006 於 2007-9-29 13:15 發表

你都不能否認共和黨失去眾議院的控制權後的確需要同民主黨協議,我所指的制衡就是這點!
而此制衡是從何而來?不是美國軍方發動政變而來,而是由美國人的選票而來的!
"theoretically", Yes they need their approval.. but the reality is that they are of the same rotten stuff.. so you dont see anything real and good get done.. thats why they have a new congress that makes no difference.. there were no effective/real counterbalance, it is more like business as usual... you need to see the real situation instead of the "theoretical" situation... theory can only gets you so far...

and Yes the american "votes" the democratic party to the congress... and apparently they are true democracy.. but this is an illusion.... you simply didnt realise the reality of the fact that there is not much difference between the democratic party and republican party.. they are both highly corrupted (except ron paul).. they way the system being implemented is rigged so that no matter which party you choose you dont get real democracy except democracy for the rich and the banker/corporate... and have you ever thought why there are only 2 parties to choose from?? and ever thought why it takes millions of dollar to even participate in the election...? then you can understand who can afford this much money to do that? ever heard of the widespread electronic voting machine fraud? thats why the so called democratic system in the USA is broken and an illusion... so it is more like you choose between "dictator A" and "dictator B" ... that maybe "better" than the chinese situation in the sense that they have an *illusion* of choices.. but the choices has long already been made by the few elite rulers...

This quote is enlightening: "None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free."
No one is more enslaved than a slave who doesn't think they're enslaved.

[ 本帖最後由 hardcat 於 2007-9-30 11:48 編輯 ]
If you don't trust gold, do you trust the logic of taking a pine tree, worth $4,000-$5,000, cutting it up, turning it into pulp, putting some ink on it and then calling it one billion dollars?

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Rubber 於 2007-9-28 06:36 發表
物傷其類, 要中共譴責緬甸, 等於要佢自責, 難,難,難 !
非常同意!中國共產黨本身就是軍政府,以一黨擁有私人軍事組織,也就是他們說的解放軍更明白的說就是獨裁政權,對另一個獨裁政權緬甸泰國當然惺惺相惜;

TOP

引用:
原帖由 newwave1987 於 2007-9-30 00:26 發表

非常同意!中國共產黨本身就是軍政府,以一黨擁有私人軍事組織,也就是他們說的解放軍更明白的說就是獨裁政權,對另一個獨裁政權緬甸泰國當然惺惺相惜;
應該係臭味相投, 物以類聚.
小小寰球,有幾個蒼蠅碰壁。
嗡嗡叫,幾聲淒厲,幾聲抽泣。


我唔係版主, 無權亂講野, 講錯分分鐘俾人ban


TOP

 35 12
發新話題


重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,本網站對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。本討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。


Copyright 1997- Xocat. All Right Reserved.