I heard that Carl Zeiss has release a 50-1.4 for Nikon, anyone here use that lens? is it good?

i want to buy it too...

玩 Zeiss 鏡,硬係唔係買 D標準鏡啦！

Good idea!

引用:

原帖由 khadafy 於 2006-8-19 12:28 AM 發表
玩 Zeiss 鏡,硬係唔係買 D標準鏡啦！

I'm a rookie of photography...any sugguestion for zeiss lens?

引用:

原帖由 Dave1968 於 2006-8-21 00:21 發表


I'm a rookie of photography...any sugguestion for zeiss lens?

Zeiss生產Nikon機身專用鏡頭.........


ZEISS推出叫做ZF的產品正是NIKON F接環的手動對焦鏡頭，總共會推出六支，先推出的是85/1.4與50/1.4。鏡頭一如預期，是在日本由CONSINA代工生產。
Zeiss在它的網站首頁留下這麼一句引人遐想的句子：「百萬單眼相機使用者將會發現攝影新天地。
Zeiss推出Nikon F接環的鏡頭。而推出F接環但是不出EF接環主要的原因在於F接環已經過了專利保護期，所以Zeiss推出F接環的鏡頭並不需要Nikon同意。
當然大家最期待的就是Zeiss扮演如Sigma,、Tamron一樣的角色，提供優質鏡頭給各個不同廠牌的機身使用，唯一不同的是Ziess應該走高品質、高價位路線。這個策略也符合一般人對Zeiss很會做鏡頭，但是不太會做機身的認知，直接專注在最有競爭力的光學領域上.

[ 本帖最後由 khadafy 於 2006-8-21 08:13 AM 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 khadafy 於 2006-8-19 12:28 AM 發表
玩 Zeiss 鏡,硬係唔係買 D標準鏡啦！

????? why not?!?!
i would say "玩標準鏡, 硬係唔買Zeiss 鏡!"
my choice is Summicron: cheaper, smaller, lighter, sharper, the sharpest!!! higher resolution, best out of focus area, rich colour tone, execllent mechanical built... so on and so on...

best regards

引用:

原帖由 mister_sunny 於 2006-8-22 07:53 AM 發表



????? why not?!?!
i would say "玩標準鏡, 硬係唔買Zeiss 鏡!"
my choice is Summicron: cheaper, smaller, lighter, sharper, the sharpest!!! higher resolution, best out of focus area ...

hey brother, don't know much about Summicron, could u tell us more? and which Summicron lens you got?

引用:

原帖由 Dave1968 於 2006-9-4 11:45 AM 發表


hey brother, don't know much about Summicron, could u tell us more? and which Summicron lens you got?

引用:

原帖由 mister_sunny 於 2006-8-22 15:53 發表



????? why not?!?!
i would say "玩標準鏡, 硬係唔買Zeiss 鏡!"
my choice is Summicron: cheaper, smaller, lighter, sharper, the sharpest!!! higher resolution, best out of focus area ...

Not a fair comparison wow, Zeiss is a f1.4, your Summicron is only f2.0.  If you were to compare the 2, it should be the summilux, but the the price difference is just another class on its own!  Personally, it has always been the colur saturation and depthness in the B/W pics that make them a class on their own!

引用:

原帖由 dcat 於 2006-9-7 16:27 發表

I agree.

In fact, not only talking about Zeiss, personally, I would say the standard lens is the least useful. I think, less than 5% of the pictures I take now, are taken with standard lens.
...

The questions here are market segment and ROI.

Market Segment:
Who are their target customers?
What kind of phtos do they take?
Why would then want to buy a Zeiss lens for their Nikon camera?

ROI
How much time and cost will it be for them to come up with a zoom lens computation that is up to the standard to have the name Zeiss?
How much will their target customers willing to pay for a new Zeiss zoom lens vs what is already in the market that is satruated with both high-quality and value-for-money lens?
How much is it to take the existing proven cumputation and just make a standard lens?