
下面是一位英軍[沙展] 對 Jackal 的評價 :
Dont know why idiot comments make me bite but here i go again!
Mate, Brits tend to use a different trade off between mobility and armour than our American cousins.
Jackal has been in theatre a while now, take that into consideration with the amount of contacts (we are in Helmand by the way, not the North or West of Afghan) and you will see the level of casualties on these vehicles is not huge.
Also have a look at the weaon systems placed on the mobile gun platform that is the Jackal/Cougar. Once engaged the Brits can manouver quickly and over dificult terrain to a distance where they out gun the enemy (e.g GMG, accurate GPMG, 50. cal, javelin etc etc).
We have mastiff if we need protection on MTR's, but on fighting/recce patrols these vehicles are the bee's knees.
Brits whinge alot (you could never stop us complaining about the SA80 A1 and the weather) but when we have the right kit we have to find something new to pick holes in, ive not met a squaddie yet with a bad word to say about the Jackal. Vector yes, Jackal no.
If the soldiers are happy the kit is performing.
BritSig.
從此可見英軍的軍事戰技與美軍完全不同, Jackal 的功能是最前線步兵的武器載台, 而車上的 .50 cal 機鎗射程是2,000米, 與接戰的 RPG 及 AK47 只 3/4百米. 所以裝甲較美式裝備不同, 英式思維不會浪費動力在裝甲重量, 這是英式的戰法與美式不同.