香港 Xocat Forum 討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 支持清拆皇后!!!!! [打印本頁]

作者: cruyfftony 時間: 2007-7-31 03:59 標題: 支持清拆皇后!!!!!

幾個靚仔系道食飽飯冇屎all,攪對抗,做英雄 !!!

作者: 糧地官 時間: 2007-7-31 09:39

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Rubber 時間: 2007-7-31 09:53

引用:

原帖由 糧地官 於 2007-7-31 09:39 發表

班友仔自已為是，從來無理過捱塞車市民的感受。

再者，得個幾條友，他們憑甚麼代表市民。

徵求下聯；

此女「何來」，食飽飯等屎痾。

特衰 [正苦], 真獨裁招民憤.

作者: ken-man 時間: 2007-7-31 11:00

請大英帝國曾爵士下令清場，以免先英餘孽復辟！

作者: FXO 時間: 2007-7-31 12:19

乜菜[餿肉], 煲燶左就縮沙

作者: 科拿仔 時間: 2007-7-31 14:08

都唔知保留清朝既恥辱黎做咩？

作者: loksiu 時間: 2007-7-31 17:49

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 飛毛腿 時間: 2007-7-31 18:33

引用:

原帖由 科拿仔 於 2007-7-31 14:08 發表
都唔知保留清朝既恥辱黎做咩？

乜恥辱呀 ?
呢 d 係洋主人甘棠遺愛

作者: Bill4r 時間: 2007-8-1 01:46

引用:

原帖由 loksiu 於 2007-7-31 05:49 AM 發表

就係因為不知羞恥囉.

Good Point ......

The protesters has nothing better to do..........

They fail to realize that we live in a changing world........

作者: kcpw0n 時間: 2007-8-2 13:21 標題: 支持清拆皇后!!!!!

支持清拆行動!!!!!
支持清拆行動!!!!!
支持清拆行動!!!!!

作者: miki 時間: 2007-8-2 15:34

對呀, 這些什麼本土行動的人怎能自稱代表香港大部人意見, 只因為行為夠激烈, 給人錯覺以為全民都要誓死保衛皇后似的, 其實行為愚蠢自私, 昨天看見現場要那麼多人服侍他們, 又處處小心不敢弄痛他們, 又為他們打傘, 越看真越氣憤. 嚴重浪費警力! 嚴重浪費納稅人金錢!
http://epeace128.mysinablog.com/ ... mp;articleId=704614

作者: kenny01 時間: 2007-8-2 16:23

我很懷念皇后碼頭....
儘管其他人話佢既歷史任務已經結束

皇后碼頭響香港五十年,好多人話係英國甚至係滿清留落下來的問題
我就覺得呢個碼頭係屬於香港既

希望香港政府今次之後,可以變精一點
用古物來找商機 - 新加玻好叻,連澳門都識
唔好令香港只係剩低新式建築
高樓大樓一百層可觀性,每每不及一個涼亭...

作者: hamlo2006 時間: 2007-8-2 17:34

Too bad we couldn't see any of those fucking 'kids' jumping down from the ceiling of the pier last night, they did not have that guts anyway, did they not ? What a pity they are just a bunch of politically-spoiled dirty little kids with no balls and talent for big business ! They are like most of the anti-Government bodies here in H.K. , they just know how to talk shit and make funny noises all day long instead of having the ability to build a better place for all citizen of Hong Kong to live in ! Shame on HKSAR ang H.K.Police too, they acted so un-professionally in dealing with just a few kids and a few political clown like 'Cheung-Mo' ! With such poor administrative skill and determination we can't expect them to rule HK properly and lead the people to fight for a better tomorrow ! Donald is just an empty-talker , he just don't have the potential and guts to be a strong political leader !

作者: 飛毛腿 時間: 2007-8-2 17:41

新一代 "保皇黨 " 一夜成名

極速上位

作者: kenny01 時間: 2007-8-2 17:48

用乜野心去諗人地,自己就係乜野人

其他人係咪全部個出發點都係諗住拿著數呢
係咪文物古蹟一點都不重要呢

希望政府借呢次既問題,以後做事會考慮多一點

作者: 八皇爺 時間: 2007-8-2 19:09

一定要集體切腹再合唱血染的風彩！

作者: ivan99 時間: 2007-8-2 19:12

[quote]原帖由 cruyfftony 於 2007-7-31 03:59 發表
幾個靚仔系道食飽飯冇屎all,攪對抗,做英雄 !!! [/quote
個班友唔死都冇用。

作者: 至尊豪庭9 時間: 2007-8-2 21:53

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Candyman 時間: 2007-8-3 07:56

Those young kids should go to protect 釣魚台 instead ....

　打到日本!

作者: Rubber 時間: 2007-8-3 10:32

又係何志平有位俾人入... 唔講.. 就俾人入司法覆劾..

作者: newlibo 時間: 2007-8-3 13:19

I don't mind my accounts will be banned....
All people in this forum are sharing the same mindset now....
Real Hong Kong people are not caring to reserve any traces from British Government, as we hate them also...
But we cherish the beauty of Hong Kong, the place we once lived, and would also be living here thereafter....

作者: FXO 時間: 2007-8-3 14:32

引用:

原帖由 newlibo 於 2007-8-3 13:19 發表
I don't mind my accounts will be banned....
All people in this forum are sharing the same mindset now....
Real Hong Kong people are not caring to reserve any traces from British Government, as we ...

All people in this forum are sharing the same mindset now

嘩, 睜大眼說夢話.

就呢條LINK都有人持唔同意見啦.

呢的係乜野人既心態

當權者

作者: kenny01 時間: 2007-8-3 15:19

我唔覺得我係其中一個all people of this forum喎

有人覺得任何阻住經濟發展(純政府角度),就係唔0岩
我就覺得經濟發展唔一定係要拆曬d舊建築,或者係任由地產商獨大先至係可行

作者: mask 時間: 2007-8-3 16:29

攪o黎攪去都係要阻止填海，換個題目就會吸引一批愚民再玩過！唔知下次係咩主題......

作者: ivan99 時間: 2007-8-3 16:40

引用:

原帖由 糧地官 於 2007-7-31 09:39 發表

班友仔自已為是，從來無理過捱塞車市民的感受。

再者，得個幾條友，他們憑甚麼代表市民。

徵求下聯；

此女「何來」，食飽飯等屎痾。

塞車對咬綜援班大食懶根本不是問題，佢地悠悠閒睇海景。

作者: 糧地官 時間: 2007-8-3 17:20

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 八皇爺 時間: 2007-8-3 18:17

皇后碼頭、愛丁堡廣場及大會堂這三位一體的公共空間是否不可分割？
當然唔係啦！
是否在歷史上、社會上、文化上構成了香港城市的心臟？
廢話！心臟係會跳嘅，皇后碼頭、愛丁堡廣場及大會堂都唔會跳！

作者: albtkl2006 時間: 2007-8-3 23:25

引用:

原帖由 八皇爺 於 2007-8-3 18:17 發表
皇后碼頭、愛丁堡廣場及大會堂這三位一體的公共空間是否不可分割？
當然唔係啦！
是否在歷史上、社會上、文化上構成了香港城市的心臟？
廢話！心臟係會跳嘅，皇后碼頭、愛丁堡廣場及大會堂都唔會跳！

就憑你這句已了解你根本不知道中文中有比喻！

作者: twinsen2000 時間: 2007-8-4 04:42

怪不得龍應台教授會說 :「中環價值」壟斷香港價值，時局板舊link
清拆可說是容易事，但記念性和代表性真的可以移型換影嗎？

[ 本帖最後由 twinsen2000 於 2007-8-4 04:47 編輯 ]

作者: ivan99 時間: 2007-8-4 10:57

引用:

原帖由 糧地官 於 2007-8-3 17:20 發表

呀! 係噃，班無聊廢柴盤踞左皇后碼頭幾個月，又要買帳幕同鎖鏈，佢地以甚麼為生。

佢地阻住改善交通，浪費時間成本，個班弱能兒一定要死守大口環，拆左大口環佢地就冇安樂窩。

作者: 八皇爺 時間: 2007-8-4 11:31

地球存在了多少年？
不如將地球列為法定古蹟，全世界的建築工程全部停止，咁香港就沒有必要再拆皇后馬頭。

作者: albtkl2006 時間: 2007-8-4 14:07

引用:

原帖由 八皇爺 於 2007-8-4 11:31 發表
地球存在了多少年？
不如將地球列為法定古蹟，全世界的建築工程全部停止，咁香港就沒有必要再拆皇后馬頭。

作者: 八皇爺 時間: 2007-8-4 14:40

為何自已打橫 o黎可以，別人打橫 o黎就唔得呢？

作者: albtkl2006 時間: 2007-8-4 15:03

引用:

原帖由 八皇爺 於 2007-8-4 14:40 發表
為何自已打橫 o黎可以，別人打橫 o黎就唔得呢？

你的回帖已顯示你是打橫嚟講啦！

作者: 八皇爺 時間: 2007-8-4 16:01

真有趣~很無聊~地球保衛者~皇后馬頭衛隊

作者: hamlo2006 時間: 2007-8-4 20:47

Why don't these ass holes fight for the preservation of those old resettlement houses? They shoild have a lot of old memories there too. I guess most of those ass holes or their parents came from those places,they shared a small cubicle with a bif familt ,shared bathroom and toilets with hundreds of people where their mother or sister might be peeped by those wolves around. These should be un-earasable memories for them all. Why they don't want to preserve those too instead of asking to live in modern estates and much better with nice sea views but pay only have to pay a small amount of rent... at the expenses of most of the tax payers of Hong Kong ! Preservation ? Bull shit ,they just don't have the calibre to talk about the subject, they are in fact really 食飽飯冇屎 al l,攪對抗 !

作者: hamlo2006 時間: 2007-8-4 20:56

Why don't these ass holes fight for the preservation of those old resettlement houses?
They should have a lot of 集體回憶 over there too. I guess most of those ass holes or
their parents came from those places,they shared a small cubicle with a big family ,
shared bathroom and toilets with hundreds of people where their mother or sister might
have been peeped by those wolves around. These should be un-earasable 集體回憶 for them all.
Why they don't want to preserve those memories too instead of asking to live in modern estates
and much better with nice sea views but only have to pay a small amount of rent...
at the expenses of most of the tax payers of Hong Kong ! Preservation ,protect the 古蹟 of H.K.? Bull shit ,
they just don't have the calibre to talk about the subject, they are in fact really 食飽飯冇屎 al l,攪對抗 !

歡迎光臨香港 Xocat Forum 討論區 (http://p.xocat.com/p/)