香港 Xocat Forum 討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 如果班fans講得永遠支持Twins時，我也懂講一見阿嬌就轉台 [打印本頁]

作者: hny 時間: 2008-2-18 07:53 標題: 如果班fans講得永遠支持Twins時，我也懂講一見阿嬌就轉台

阿嬌犯了娛樂圈不可原諒的錯..................就係淫蕩扮天真。

作者: 露哂先機 時間: 2008-2-18 10:55

一早講過,廣大網民係唔會咁輕易放過玉女的,
除非佢作古,否則佢有一百歲命都仲會比人講緊!

但呢輪發現左個新理論,有人話原來罵得玉女最勁的正是一眾廣大成年麻甩佬,因為其實係源自最深層的原始妒忌!

睇黎都似囉!

作者: hny 時間: 2008-2-18 11:19

唔好意思，我唔係你講個隻，我只係好賤視佢嘅虛偽。

作者: kenny01 時間: 2008-2-18 11:27

我都信你唔係果隻...

但係用把乜野尺度人....記得用返來度自己

祝一生不用虛偽做人....

作者: 露哂先機 時間: 2008-2-18 11:31

唔好意思,個理論唔係我講,我只係好頂唔順網民們的虛偽!

作者: 靜凊 時間: 2008-2-18 13:31

淫蕩扮天真....重要全香港人都知....a....都唔係全香港人...有D人都扮唔知架..

一丘之駱...似乎你地重合拍過twins....恭喜...xocat又多左個組合..哈哈哈哈

[ 本帖最後由靜凊於 2008-2-18 13:36 編輯 ]

作者: maezono 時間: 2008-2-18 13:44

若果呢个係舒琪等我返而無野,至幣係阿嬌之形像係純及天真但得出結果係淫同姣你係佢地fans會点諗??

作者: 露哂先機 時間: 2008-2-18 13:51

引用:

原帖由靜凊於 2008-2-18 13:31 發表
淫蕩扮天真....重要全香港人都知....a....都唔係全香港人...有D人都扮唔知架..

一丘之駱...似乎你地重合拍過twins....恭喜...xocat又多左個組合..哈哈哈哈

淫蕩扮道德....重要全個網都知....a....都唔係全個網...有D人都扮唔知架..

一丘之駱...似乎你同你班分身重合拍過twins....恭喜...xocat又多左個虛偽組合..哈哈哈哈

作者: 露哂先機 時間: 2008-2-18 14:02

引林行止專欄一段文字 :

引用:

任何大眾傳媒，一方面爭先恐後轉載那些被標籤為淫穢的網上照片，一方面則聲色俱厲地、以站在道德或識見高地的雄姿，批評當事人淫亂虛偽，譴責執法者失策荒唐等等，那是不問其身正否的自以為是和自負。觀眾讀者目迷五色之餘，問一句「有冇（無）搞錯？」是出諸直覺。敦厚一輩，也許會想起聖經上那個「別人眼中的刺、自己眼中梁木」的比喻；尖刻的，罵一句「恬不知恥」！淌入艷照渾水的傳媒中人，誰嫌過分？誰會臉紅？

拍私照有罪,偷人私照無罪?

拍私照有罪,睇人地偷番來的私照無罪?

我覺得話人扮道德的人先至最虛偽最扮有道德!

一丘之貉?
咁網民集體看玉女裸體然後再罵玉女淫賤,那這個丘之大及貉數量之多當真是蔚為奇觀!

某會員的說法令我聯想到AV片中的苦角色 - 汁男 :
企響旁邊睇住人做,自己就只能靠對手打到出汁,一邊打時仲要一邊幻想自己其實係男主角......其實心裡既妒且恨,完事後以罵人姦夫淫婦來宣洩心中的莫名仇恨以及掩飾自己的無能!

可憐!

[ 本帖最後由露哂先機於 2008-2-18 14:18 編輯 ]

作者: kenny01 時間: 2008-2-18 14:10

佢地係咪虛偽呢???我唔敢講..

但係佢地覺得度人地把尺緊,自己把尺鬆係理所當然..
就真係頭都痕埋

唔講道理由而社會對你公審....就好似幾十年前中國一場浩劫一樣!!

作者: 無名無性 時間: 2008-2-18 14:38

I simply wont trust her or any artist anymore...

作者: kenny01 時間: 2008-2-18 15:08

引用:

原帖由 無名無性 於 2008-2-18 14:38 發表
I simply wont trust her or any artist anymore...

乜本來你諗住做娛樂圈果d都係聖人來架

我當年見到郭富成話自己係處男...真係笑到出唔到聲...

阿嬌以香港男仕既計算方法...已步入中女...重希望佢係聖女....哈哈

作者: leicalover 時間: 2008-2-18 15:27

Gil's image is a product needed for the entertainment industry. She's just playing a role. She represents a lot of people's interest and investment. Think of the entertainment business as a film, there would be good guys and bad guys - just needed to give the film more dimensions. I will not take it so seriously and please don't be so disturbed --- not worth it. My only regret is how the police react to this incident. I would say their action is an insult to the so called "香港是個講法冶的地方". Period.

[ 本帖最後由 leicalover 於 2008-2-18 15:28 編輯 ]

作者: peninsula 時間: 2008-2-18 20:47

引用:

原帖由 leicalover 於 2008-2-18 15:27 發表
Gil's image is a product needed for the entertainment industry. She's just playing a role. She represents a lot of people's interest and investment. Think of the entertainment business as a film ...

Good analysis but her career is OVER!

作者: cho 時間: 2008-2-19 06:18

樓主當然可以轉台，因為每個人都可以選擇，正如有人仍肯支持佢！！

作者: FXO 時間: 2008-2-19 07:17

我從來都未支持過串屎, 哈哈!

作者: hny 時間: 2008-2-19 07:54

引用:

原帖由 kenny01 於 2008-2-18 11:27 發表
我都信你唔係果隻...

但係用把乜野尺度人....記得用返來度自己

祝一生不用虛偽做人....

唔好意思，我唔係公眾人物，唔需要扮純情，唔似得阿嬌仲要扮天真、扮純情。

作者: saltiwet 時間: 2008-2-19 08:44

引用:

原帖由 hny 於 2008-2-18 07:53 發表
阿嬌犯了娛樂圈不可原諒的錯..................就係淫蕩扮天真。

咁成龍咪犯曬大忌, 自己風流, 仲走出黎扮正經

作者: leicalover 時間: 2008-2-19 09:49

The main drive for Gil to face the public I think is the pressure from her company. She is bounded to preform if her boss needed her to. She is not there to proclaim any statement about her past action.

I think reason behind is because of the many advertisement Gil is representing. Her company will face a lot of legal claims if Gil proofs to be unwelcomed due to this incident. This is actually a very cruel punishment to Gil. It is not easy for one to face her family and friends if this happened to an ordinary people not to mention that her image is bread and butter to her living and those she support.

Just a footnote, I'm never a fan of any celebrities.

歡迎光臨香港 Xocat Forum 討論區 (http://p.xocat.com/p/)