香港 Xocat Forum 討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 貝爾斯登 [打印本頁]

作者: edison1610 時間: 2008-3-15 00:37 標題: 貝爾斯登

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: cyberken 時間: 2008-3-15 01:02

引用:

原帖由 edison1610 於 2008-3-15 00:37 發表
貝爾斯登股價跌左一半
如果我有美股帳戶，我一定買

why?

any reason??

作者: 小小力 時間: 2008-3-15 07:00

引用:

原帖由 cyberken 於 2008-3-15 01:02 發表

why?

any reason??

Bear Stern seems have a serious liquidity problem!

作者: hardcat 時間: 2008-3-15 14:36

Now that we have the Fed and JP morgan (JPM) taking up Bear Sterns' (BSC) liabilities onto its balance sheet... Moral Hazard is fast becoming a benign term... Superficially, there is no societal reason whatsoever why BSC should be bailed out at all, as the loss are investment/speculation money only... but the details is not as simple as that... BSC is tightly knitted into the whole financial system, and it *had* to be saved, because BSC is a big counterparty in the 45+ trillions credit derivatives universe... If BSC were to default, it would result in a cascading collapse like a house of cards in the derivatives markets, the situation would be pure horror... so JPM had to take the bullet for BSC, just like Bank of America had to take the bullet for CountryWide, both with unconditional backings from the Fed behind (the Fed is providing non-recourse, back-to-back financing for the JPM case).. and JPM is carrying the biggest derivatives books around...

Lehman Brothers will probably be the next to blow... stay tune...

[ 本帖最後由 hardcat 於 2008-3-15 16:53 編輯 ]

作者: peninsula 時間: 2008-3-15 22:07

引用:

原帖由 hardcat 於 2008-3-15 14:36 發表
Now that we have the Fed and JP morgan (JPM) taking up Bear Sterns' .

Good analysis - maybe BIG crash is really coming!

作者: edison1610 時間: 2008-3-17 09:28

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: peninsula 時間: 2008-3-17 21:55

引用:

原帖由 edison1610 於 2008-3-17 09:28 發表
如果你話中國人民銀行注資港股, 你話點解唔買?
人地貝爾斯登就有得注資, 港股直通車就係歧視... 唉

Chain reaction - terrible.

作者: hktigerwoods 時間: 2008-3-18 15:22

引用:

原帖由 edison1610 於 2008-3-14 16:37 發表
貝爾斯登股價跌左一半
如果我有美股帳戶，我一定買

i would prefer to buy citi corp or goldman

作者: hardcat 時間: 2008-3-18 18:27

引用:

原帖由 hktigerwoods 於 2008-3-18 15:22 發表

i would prefer to buy citi corp or goldman

If it were me, I would not touch them with a ten-foot pole, highly radioactive waste... especially in light of the the unravelling financial meltdown/collapse...
And Citigroup is worse than GS... Citigroup is still so capital impaired despite the bailout, they are still trying to stay solvent...

作者: peninsula 時間: 2008-3-18 21:06

引用:

原帖由 hardcat 於 2008-3-18 18:27 發表
If it were me, I would not touch them with a ten-foot pole, highly radioactive waste... especially in light of the the unravelling financial ...

Exactly. Lehman Brothers may go down also.

作者: nokia6188 時間: 2008-3-19 07:18

buy lor...today u will get $ 6 per share instead of $ 30 bucks....!!!

作者: brother88 時間: 2008-3-19 08:22

Last Trade: 5.91
Trade Time: 4:01PM ET
Change: Up 1.10 (22.87%)
Prev Close: 4.81
Open: 5.50
Bid: N/A
Ask: N/A
1y Target Est: 2.00

Day's Range: 5.01 - 8.50
52wk Range: 2.84 - 159.36
Volume: 166,729,805
Avg Vol (3m): 18,166,700
Market Cap: 804.68M
P/E (ttm): 3.88
EPS (ttm): 1.523
Div & Yield: 1.28 (4.30%

作者: edison1610 時間: 2008-3-19 09:21

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: V.V 時間: 2008-3-20 14:09