香港 Xocat Forum 討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 立会成立雷曼调委会被否决 - 政棍即是政棍! [打印本頁]

作者: CAB 時間: 2008-10-11 12:03 標題: 立会成立雷曼调委会被否决 - 政棍即是政棍!

一边做show话帮苦主，一边又否决议案（特别是那些缺席的泛民！）

如果我是苦主，马上叫那些政棍行开

作者: 理魯竇 時間: 2008-10-11 13:52

引用:

原帖由 CAB 於 2008-10-11 12:03 發表
一边做show话帮苦主，一边又否决议案（特别是那些缺席的泛民！）

如果我是苦主，马上叫那些政棍行开

將來可能要打官司，
現階段成立調查委員會，
未必適合。

作者: FXO 時間: 2008-10-11 15:47

議員投票立場
支持（ 21 票）
民主黨（ 6 票）、公民黨（ 4 票）、社民連（ 3 票）、李卓人、馮檢基、劉慧卿、何秀蘭、張國柱、謝偉俊、詹培忠、梁美芬

反對（ 22 票）
民建聯（ 8 票）、工聯會（ 3 票）、自由黨（ 1 票）、葉劉淑儀、石禮謙、劉皇發、霍震霆、譚偉豪、陳健波、李鳳英、梁君彥、梁劉柔芬、林健鋒

無投票或缺席（ 16 票）

資料來源：立法會

作者: netvigator 時間: 2008-10-11 16:48

引用:

原帖由 FXO 於 2008-10-11 07:47 發表
議員投票立場
支持（ 21 票）
民主黨（ 6 票）、公民黨（ 4 票）、社民連（ 3 票）、李卓人、馮檢基、劉慧卿、何秀蘭、張國柱、謝偉俊、詹培忠、梁美芬 ...

睇完, 「鬼」就現哂形嘞, 至於「人」呢, 就尚待觀察

作者: peninsula 時間: 2008-10-11 17:40

引用:

原帖由 FXO 於 2008-10-11 15:47 發表
議員投票立場...

So close.

作者: 148 時間: 2008-10-11 22:07

民建聯（ 8 票）、工聯會（ 3 票）、自由黨（ 1 票）、葉劉淑儀、石禮謙、劉皇發、霍震霆、譚偉豪、陳健波、李鳳英、梁君彥、梁劉柔芬、林健鋒
Let's remember them.
出賣雷曼苦主
曾要政府包底卻投票反對設委會

作者: breatharian 時間: 2008-10-12 01:03

xxx ：我地開會第一件事反對調查銀行有無呃你地好唔好?
苦主：好!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:L :L :L

[youtube]c2xRQWSfFQc&feature=iv&annotation_id=event_842977[/youtube]

[ 本帖最後由 breatharian 於 2008-10-12 01:10 編輯 ]

作者: FXO 時間: 2008-10-12 10:09

引用:

原帖由 148 於 2008-10-11 22:07 發表
民建聯（ 8 票）、工聯會（ 3 票）、自由黨（ 1 票）、葉劉淑儀、石禮謙、劉皇發、霍震霆、譚偉豪、陳健波、李鳳英、梁君彥、梁劉柔芬、林健鋒
Let's r ...

呢的咪係政棍囉

民建聯喎, 的苦主唔知有幾多人投佢地票呢?

作者: 一枝公 時間: 2008-10-12 10:43

厚顔無恥不嬲係民建聯黨員最基本守則架！

作者: c0707323 時間: 2008-10-12 15:06

引用:

原帖由 一枝公 於 2008-10-12 10:43 發表
厚顔無恥不嬲係民建聯黨員最基本守則架！

唔好漏底汛民啦唔該

作者: peninsula 時間: 2008-10-12 16:49

引用:

原帖由 148 於 2008-10-11 22:07 發表
民建聯（ 8 票）、工聯會（ 3 票）、自由黨（ 1 票）、葉劉淑儀、石禮謙、劉皇發、霍震霆、譚偉豪、陳健波、李鳳英、梁君彥、梁劉柔芬、林健鋒 ...

Well, they may be right!

作者: oneout 時間: 2008-10-12 17:03

人不為己,天豬自滅!

作者: 理魯竇 時間: 2008-10-12 17:08 標題: 講多一次

將來可能要打官司，
現階段成立調查委員會，
未必適合。

作者: 甩毛腿二世 時間: 2008-10-13 17:05

引用:

原帖由 一枝公 於 2008-10-12 10:43 發表
厚顔無恥不嬲係民建聯黨員最基本守則架！

同意! 說得好!!

民建聯最無恥!

民建聯一邊叫政府包底, 另一邊又唔比政府調查捉賊, 無恥至極!

作者: peninsula 時間: 2008-10-13 21:16

引用:

原帖由 甩毛腿二世 於 2008-10-13 17:05 發表
同意! 說得好!!
民建聯最無恥!
民建聯一邊叫政府包底, 另一邊又唔比政府調查捉賊, 無恥至極!

Well, use your tax to pay?

作者: CAB 時間: 2008-10-13 22:29

Don't forget those who don't vote.

Most of these are full-time legco - what else is more important than cast their votes?

有真小人，但别忘了伪君子。。。

作者: peninsula 時間: 2008-10-14 20:55

引用:

原帖由 CAB 於 2008-10-13 22:29 發表
Don't forget those who don't vote.
Most of these are full-time legco - what else is more important than cast their votes?有真小人，但别忘了伪君子。。。

Nevertheless, using taxpayers money to finance such losses is just not generally acceptable. Plenty of others need help too.

作者: CAB 時間: 2008-10-14 22:11

It doesn't meant using taxpayer's money, but at least they should:

1. Ascertain how many cases are mis-selling. You can see how many elderly are involved, thinking these are deposits w banks. For these, it can be taken to court & then sued the bank to repay the damage (even if they signed the docs, they can claim undue influence or the risk profiling didn't reflect the facts);

2. Did HKMA properly perform their monitoring role? Regular check with banks whether these products are properly sold? (if yes, then why so many these products sold to elderly, C9, & some even put their whole wealth in it?). Are all forms properly signed? (I believe many cases don't, & that's why there are banks willing to compromise few weeks ago). This investigation can't leave to HKMA.

3. What actions have HKMA taken to protect these people's interest since the incident? As I remembered, Japan already freezed Lehman's asset immediately the next day. And for HKMA, they even can't answer how much money is involved two weeks after the incident (it's really scaring for a regulator as they should order the banks to report right after the incident). Have their interest been affected because of HKMA wrong doings?

3. Did HKMA approve these products? As understood, some notes are even not approved by HKMA.

4. And how many mis-selling are still there? Commodity funds, more complex products that linked to interest rate etc.

There are many more...& if this does not deserve an investigation despite so many people & funds involved, then what we need these legco for?

歡迎光臨香港 Xocat Forum 討論區 (http://p.xocat.com/p/)