¼ÐÃD: Sigma or Tamron?? [¥´¦L¥»­¶]

---

§@ªÌ: fs8218    ®É¶¡: 2009-1-18 01:33     ¼ÐÃD: Sigma or Tamron??

¦pªG·Q¶R¤ä 18-200 or 18-250, Sigma or Tamron ¦nd©O??
Budget ©Ò­­, ¥[¤W¤S­ø«Y±M·~, ¨âªÌ½è¯ÀÃä°¦¦nd©O??
Thanks!

---

§@ªÌ: victory999    ®É¶¡: 2009-1-18 12:50

http://forum.timway.com/f/thread-222450-1-2.html

---

§@ªÌ: fs8218    ®É¶¡: 2009-1-19 13:19

Thanks a lot!

---

§@ªÌ: brunokuan    ®É¶¡: 2009-2-14 22:56

Sigma is better

---

§@ªÌ: Bonkinasia    ®É¶¡: 2009-2-20 08:48

Same situation last time when I am considering purchasing between these 2 brands.

Sigma 18-200, f:3.5 - f:6.3 with OS (Optical Stabiliser) .
Cannon called Image Stabiliser (IS) while Nikkon called Variation Reduction (VR).  
Low speed lenses with aperture F:4 and above better opt for OS features.

Tamron 18-250 does not have OS, not doubt it is lighter and cheaper.

Finally I purchase Sigma 18-200mm lenses instead.  Since then I have been using this set of lenses during my travel in the mainland.  The photos taken are shape and good  as comparable with my existing Canon kit lenses.

But I am still looking for 28 - 70 mm F:2.8 with macro and Standars lenses 50mm f:1.2.  These 2 higher speed lenses are rather expensive.  Hope that this poor economy will help to lower the price of these lenses before I make purchase again.

---

§@ªÌ: hamninewest    ®É¶¡: 2009-2-25 18:24

For ÂøµP lens I think Sigma is better.  I have compared the two brand and found that Sigma lens is sharper than Tamron.

---

§@ªÌ: peninsula    ®É¶¡: 2009-2-25 21:49

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ hamninewest ©ó 2009-2-25 18:24 µoªí
For ÂøµP lens I think Sigma is better.  I have compared the two brand and found that Sigma lens is sharper than Tamron.

Sigma is ÂøµP

---

§@ªÌ: victory999    ®É¶¡: 2009-2-25 22:51

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ peninsula ©ó 2009-2-25 09:49 PM µoªí

Sigma is ÂøµP

sigma 105mm©wµJ2.8ùÚ©w¥ú°é

---

§@ªÌ: khadafy    ®É¶¡: 2009-2-26 03:37

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ peninsula ©ó 2009-2-25 21:49 µoªí

Sigma is ÂøµP

¥b®q®v¥S......¦º°¨¨Ã¤£¬O¤j¼t...©Ò¥H¥s¤°µP¤]¤£¹L¥÷..
¾ã´X±i¬Û¨õ¤j®a¤ñ¸û¤U..
(¥H¤U»ù¿ú¥H¦æ³f­pºâ)

¤W,Canon 17-40 F4 L $5,100.
¤¤,Sigma  18-50 F2.8EX DC MACRO HSM $3,300.
¤U,ÄËÀs   17-35 F2.8-4 Di(A05) $2,350 (2008-08-27)¦Ó®a¥i¯à¥ò¥­D

---

§@ªÌ: moxfactor    ®É¶¡: 2009-2-26 19:29

Sigma EX Ãè­ø®t±o¹LN©ÎC°O...  «DEXÃè´NÃøÁ¿d...  28-300mm´Nª½ÀY«Y®t.  §Ú70-200¥ÎSigma, sharpness®ÄªG¥i¦P¤p¥Õ¤Ç¼Ä.  10-20mm´N¤¤¤W°Õ, §ÚÁé·N«Y¦]¬°­Ódistortion«l, ¥i¥Hª±³¥, ­ø¦PTokina¤ä11-16Ëݪ½.  ¥ò¦³¤ä150mm f2.8 macro «Y«D±`­ø¿ù¬J¿ï¾Ü.

Tokina ¦³¯d·N¹L¬J¥X¦ìÃè±o¤ä 11-16mm

Tamron Ú»¬ü°êºô´N¸Ü«Y3¤jÂø°O¤¤¥X³Ì¦n¬Jsuperzoom, 18-200, 28-300
(AF18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC, AF28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di VC , µ¥µ¥...  ³£«Y­ø¿ù¬J¿ï¾Ü)

---

§@ªÌ: peninsula    ®É¶¡: 2009-2-26 21:43

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ victory999 ©ó 2009-2-25 22:51 µoªí
sigma 105mm©wµJ2.8ùÚ©w¥ú°é

Seems quite sharp wor!

---

§@ªÌ: victory999    ®É¶¡: 2009-2-27 01:28

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ peninsula ©ó 2009-2-26 09:43 PM µoªí

Seems quite sharp wor!

©O¤äÃè¦n¥¿¬[.

[ ¥»©«³Ì«á¥Ñ victory999 ©ó 2009-2-27 01:30 ½s¿è ]

---

Åwªï¥úÁ{ ­»´ä Xocat Forum °Q½×°Ï (http://p.xocat.com/p/)

Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0