香港 Xocat Forum 討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 信和,恆隆這些二打六憑什麼創新高 [打印本頁]

作者: icac 時間: 2007-1-2 23:47 標題: 信和,恆隆這些二打六憑什麼創新高

我完全吾明,他們管理和十年前我吾覺有什麼改善

作者: happycamel 時間: 2007-1-3 00:17

作者: peninsula 時間: 2007-1-4 23:33

引用:

原帖由 icac 於 2007-1-2 11:47 PM 發表
我完全吾明,他們管理和十年前我吾覺有什麼改善

Hang Lung is not too bad but I don't like Sino Land.

作者: 東虫 時間: 2007-1-5 00:21

引用:

原帖由 icac 於 2007-1-2 03:47 PM 發表
我完全吾明,他們管理和十年前我吾覺有什麼改善

萬般因素歸於市

作者: icac 時間: 2007-1-7 21:30

hang lung 既管理,有時間可去一去雅蘭商場toilet,
看看是如何污穢和"香"

作者: titov 時間: 2007-1-7 21:59

地產股既資產同眼光比管理更重要。

作者: peninsula 時間: 2007-1-7 23:09

引用:

原帖由 icac 於 2007-1-7 09:30 PM 發表
hang lung 既管理,有時間可去一去雅蘭商場toilet,
看看是如何污穢和"香"

Their apartments are not bad. I used to own a couple of their developments.

作者: leoxi 時間: 2007-1-9 13:57

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2007-1-7 11:09 PM 發表

Their apartments are not bad. I used to own a couple of their developments.

Is it the HarbourSide?

very nice place indeed

I live in one of Sino Land's properties, I have to say the materials used for buildings aren't that great. Not forget to mention poor property management

[ 本帖最後由 leoxi 於 2007-1-9 06:22 PM 編輯 ]

作者: peninsula 時間: 2007-1-9 14:26

[quote]原帖由 leoxi 於 2007-1-9 01:57 PM 發表
Is it the HarbourSide?

very nice place indeed.

I wish it was. But NO, AquaMarine and New Haven. Finishings were very good.

作者: mkkwong01 時間: 2007-1-9 23:38

if you think Sino Land and Hang Lung Properteis are that bad, howcome they can outperform those big developers such as SHKP and Henderson Land?

作者: qwer6789 時間: 2007-1-10 11:58

兩個都靠啊爺
一個靠啊爺幫
一個係啊爺到做大生意

歡迎光臨香港 Xocat Forum 討論區 (http://p.xocat.com/p/)