香港 Xocat Forum 討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 公會個廣告 [打印本頁]

作者: CPAMBA 時間: 2006-8-15 11:22 標題: 公會個廣告

大家點睇

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoEe7k965zg&search=HKICPA

作者: KOTO 時間: 2006-8-16 17:20

too bad

作者: 軍師 時間: 2006-8-16 22:53

Cheap.

作者: taurus 時間: 2006-8-19 11:48

Ooo ...... disgusting ...

Why this clip promotes all the negative elements of the profession : bowing to money and power ...

Why not promoting impartiality and dare to say no to power ...

Why ...

作者: 軍師 時間: 2006-8-19 18:07

引用:

原帖由 taurus 於 2006-8-19 11:48 AM 發表
Ooo ...... disgusting ...

Why this clip promotes all the negative elements of the profession : bowing to money and power ...

Why not promoting impartiality and dare to say no ...

唉，真係不知所謂，今晚又有得睇 la 該會！......

作者: taurus 時間: 2006-8-20 01:41

軍師 ,

在民主社會和言論自由的旗幟下, 唯有轉台唔好睇佢囉 !

好在我的大廈有提供鳳凰中文台, 澳門的澳亞台, 新知台等等的選擇, 所以我很少看到該廣告.

作者: CPAMBA 時間: 2006-8-20 10:37

真係唔明個會用d會員既血汗錢(會費etc), 拍埋d咁低質既廣告~~~~

作者: 軍師 時間: 2006-8-20 20:48

引用:

原帖由 taurus 於 2006-8-20 01:41 AM 發表
軍師 ,

在民主社會和言論自由的旗幟下, 唯有轉台唔好睇佢囉 !

好在我的大廈有提供鳳凰中文台, 澳門的澳亞台, 新知台等等的選擇, 所以我很少看到該廣告.

我唔係想睇佢啊，我係想睇 Donald Trump 點抄人炸，買牛肉係都要送條臭崩崩既腸，無計。

作者: 軍師 時間: 2006-8-20 20:50

引用:

原帖由 CPAMBA 於 2006-8-20 10:37 AM 發表
真係唔明個會用d會員既血汗錢(會費etc), 拍埋d咁低質既廣告~~~~

係囉係囉，好低俗：

作者: dejavu2003 時間: 2006-8-20 23:05

引用:

原帖由 CPAMBA 於 2006-8-20 02:37 AM 發表
真係唔明個會用d會員既血汗錢(會費etc), 拍埋d咁低質既廣告~~~~

所以我地以前會員一仟，會費幾舊，而家會員幾萬(?)，會費二仟。

會址從中環搬去Belgian Bank bldg.再去金鍾，而家都唔知係邊? 好似愈搬愈豪咁。嗰日重介紹有個 lounge，俾會員去happy hour. 但講真，有冇人需要上去先。咁多年來，我只上過一次攞馬牌。

作者: Paolo336 時間: 2006-8-25 10:02

個幾廣告只能用bad taste來形容,無個得

好似好幽默..實際效果好肉酸...
反而更加stereotype會計佬口既形象

作者: taurus 時間: 2006-8-26 08:33 標題: RE:公會個廣告

Other than making your comments here, will any of you consider to write to the Association ...

作者: jimmyboy2102 時間: 2006-8-27 13:21

THEY HAVE THEIR POINT OF VIEW!!!!!!!!!!!

作者: 科拿仔 時間: 2006-8-30 17:40

完全表現唔到專業性....

作者: CPAMBA 時間: 2006-8-30 21:48

引用:

原帖由 科拿仔 於 2006-8-30 05:40 PM 發表
完全表現唔到專業性....

咪就係~~~

作者: Rx-Rider 時間: 2006-8-31 13:25

I would very much wonder which employee could have the guts to speak to a wealthy man in such tone ........

作者: 軍師 時間: 2006-9-3 10:07

引用:

原帖由 Rx-Rider 於 2006-8-31 01:25 PM 發表
I would very much wonder which employee could have the guts to speak to a wealthy man in such tone ........

那位最後問 Donald 怎樣洗髮的仁兄樣貎實在太 "偎鎖"，其他人發問時的神態表情亦有低俗的感覺，整體印象太差了。

作者: ltc171792 時間: 2006-9-3 13:10 標題: 完全低能

完全低能

作者: XO830 時間: 2006-9-5 04:51

Bad Taste!

The Institute should promote attributes such as professionism, integrity, voice of reason etc.

Perhaps, The Institute just does not want to widen the expectation gap.

作者: gsgsgs 時間: 2006-9-21 20:08 標題: 好啊

好好工作啊啊啊啊啊

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-9-22 10:15

引用:

原帖由 gsgsgs 於 2006-9-21 04:08 AM 發表
好好工作啊啊啊啊啊

Quite good series of ADS!

作者: jjjaverjaver 時間: 2006-9-22 12:35 標題: 想死

班友用邊到諗野

作者: jjolean 時間: 2006-10-1 23:22

waste $$........

作者: lovemaker0008 時間: 2006-10-17 00:15

doesn't fit the industry image

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-10-17 09:53

引用:

原帖由 lovemaker0008 於 2006-10-17 12:15 AM 發表
doesn't fit the industry image

But quite creative!

作者: fightclub 時間: 2006-10-20 12:46

I call it naive if they think it can change the image of accountant. I prefer they spend more on charity.

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-10-20 12:48

引用:

原帖由 fightclub 於 2006-10-20 12:46 PM 發表
I call it naive if they think it can change the image of accountant. I prefer they spend more on charity.

Have some sense of humour MAN!

作者: jjjaverjaver 時間: 2006-10-26 12:42

呵呵...其實模仿飛黃騰達個廣告仲衰.....睇得出公會做野只係識抄...

作者: auriga00 時間: 2006-10-27 09:37

Stupid people --> stupid idea --> stupid commercial!

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-10-27 17:19

引用:

原帖由 auriga00 於 2006-10-27 09:37 AM 發表
Stupid people --> stupid idea --> stupid commercial!

Who are you to judge? Create a conservative commercial and everyone will say BORING!!

作者: fightclub 時間: 2006-11-2 14:09

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2006-10-20 04:48 AM 發表

Have some sense of humour MAN!

It is not a matter of humor but whether the money is well spend. My friend in ad firm estimated/monitored HKICPA's ad spending and the estimate the total spend for one year is about 3 to 5m (think of the ad they posted in Newspaper and Bus Stop, they are expensive.). I prefer this money to go to charity or some activities that add value to the society (e.g. The Arcitect History of HK Roadshow organized by Arcitect Society), create a more positive image. Fresh graduates are smart enough not to confuse such ad with reality.

作者: 362436 時間: 2006-11-8 16:50

What an unappealing ad ! Waste our money !!

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-11-8 17:35

引用:

原帖由 362436 於 2006-11-8 04:50 PM 發表
What an unappealing ad ! Waste our money !!

What kind do you suggest? Conservative style??

作者: CPAMBA 時間: 2006-11-8 21:02

3 November 2006

  To: All Members

  Dear XXXX,

  The Council has decided to increase the annual membership fee by HK$250 from HK$2,100 to HK$2,350 beginning in 2007.

  You'll notice that the Institute has not revised its annual membership fee or any other fees and charges since 2002 (and before that, 1998). The Institute's annual membership fee is also lower than many accounting bodies, which do not perform as many functions as the Institute.

  The Council has been making and will continue to make prudent financial decisions in the interest of members and to invest in the future of the profession. As the public expectations of the accounting profession continue to grow, so does our obligation to invest in our members. This obligation is more likely to deepen than diminish in the coming years.

  The Council is planning to make small incremental fee increases over the next few years to ensure adequate financial resources are available to fund the initiatives that fulfill the Institute's statutory and membership responsibilities. The fee adjustment seeks to align our finances with our responsibilities.

  We have changed the organisation in order to better support members and their standing in the community. The introduction of QP on the mainland, the new Beijing office and our expanded presence in the international arena are part of our investments in order to take the Institute to the next plane. Our expanded space, including the library, new training centre and members' lounge, costs more to operate than our old premises, but it provides great facilities for our members in CPD and fellowship. We're also exploring offering members more opportunities to specialise in order to increase the market value of their skills and expand their career opportunities.

  Our regulatory duties also consume a great deal of resources, but these are important to keep within the Institute. We need to keep regulation in our own hands rather than allow it to devolve completely into the hands of an outside regulator, as we've seen happen in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. The Institute is the only accountancy body in Hong Kong with regulatory responsibilities. Despite the formation of the Financial Reporting Council, our regulatory duties will continue to be heavy - as they should be.

  The Council has approved several other fee increases, including a $150 surcharge for members who continue to choose hard-copy correspondence with the Institute. This amount will cover the additional costs for printing and postage. So far, we have 16,000 members who have opted to communicate with the Institute electronically and we thank them. The surcharge for members receiving hard-copy correspondence is so that in this day and age, with the emphasis on reducing paper wastage, members using electronic communication will not be subsidizing those who do not.

  Annual fees for practising certificates for individuals and for practising partners of a firm or member directors of a corporate practice will be raised from $4,600 to $4,800. Fees for non-practising partners of firms or non-practising member directors of corporate practices (except for sole-practitioner corporate practices) will increase from $9,200 to $9,600. These fees will be used to cover part of the new practice review programme, which has far greater depth than the previous programme and is an integral part of the reform of our regulatory regime and compliance with our membership obligation with IFAC.

  The annual registration fee of a non-member director of a sole-practitioner corporate practice will be reduced from $9,200 to $2,400. Section 153A(1) of the Companies Ordinance was amended in 2004 to allow a single shareholder to incorporate a limited company. Members passed a resolution at the 33rd AGM held on 16 December 2005 to amend section 28D(5) of the Professional Accountants Ordinance such that a single practising member of the Institute shall be entitled to register a corporate practice, so as to align with the changes to the Companies Ordinance. However, we have been advised by the HKSAR Government that there is unlikely to be a time slot for an amendment bill in the next two years. Until the PAO is amended, the Institute has a statutory responsibility to regulate a non-member director of a sole-practitioner corporate practice. But to mitigate the situation, the Council has decided to reduce the annual registration fee for non -member directors of corporate practices to $2,400.

  Members who are 65 years of age or over and have been a member of the Institute for 20 years or more will pay a reduced fee at 25 percent of the regular fee (i.e. HK$588). Those members now registered under the "retired" category will continue to pay reduced rates.

  Please refer to the attached schedule for the new fees and charges from 1 January 2007.

  The Council has asked me to thank all members for their continued support for and commitment to the profession and believes that the improvements over the p><e Institute on behalf of members. Members now have bigger and better facilities, more CPD and other member services, greater international representation and mobility, and a qualification programme of which we can be proud.

  I trust you will find this modest increase a worthwhile investment for the profession as we search for continuous improvement on behalf of members.

  Sincere regards,

  Winnie C.W. Cheung
Chief Executive & Registrar

Encl.

作者: fightclub 時間: 2006-11-8 21:03

引用:

原帖由 CPAMBA 於 2006-11-8 01:02 PM 發表
3 November 2006

  To: All Members

  Dear XXXX,

  The Council has decided to increase the annual membership fee by HK$250 from HK$2,100 to HK$2,350 beginning in 2007.

  You'l ...

I want to post this letter too. HKICPA wasted the money, than raise he fee! For what!?

作者: dejavu2003 時間: 2006-11-8 21:41

引用:

原帖由 CPAMBA 於 2006-11-8 01:02 PM 發表
3 November 2006

  To: All Members

  Dear XXXX,

  The Council has decided to increase the annual membership fee by HK$250 from HK$2,100 to HK$2,350 beginning in 2007.

  You'l ...

It won't affect me, as I am withdrawing from the membership on 1 Jan 2007.

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-11-9 13:46

引用:

原帖由 dejavu2003 於 2006-11-8 09:41 PM 發表
It won't affect me, as I am withdrawing from the membership on 1 Jan 2007.

Won't affect me either. Company is happy to pay!

作者: CPAMBA 時間: 2006-11-9 20:12

引用:

原帖由 dejavu2003 於 2006-11-8 09:41 PM 發表

It won't affect me, as I am withdrawing from the membership on 1 Jan 2007.

WELL DONE

作者: CPAMBA 時間: 2006-11-9 20:15

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2006-11-9 01:46 PM 發表

Won't affect me either. Company is happy to pay!

真幸福

作者: auriga00 時間: 2006-11-13 16:03

引用:

原帖由 dejavu2003 於 2006-11-8 09:41 PM 發表

It won't affect me, as I am withdrawing from the membership on 1 Jan 2007.

Same here

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-11-13 16:04

引用:

原帖由 dejavu2003 於 2006-11-8 09:41 PM 發表
It won't affect me, as I am withdrawing from the membership on 1 Jan 2007.

So what will you join?

作者: dejavu2003 時間: 2006-11-13 22:27

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2006-11-13 08:04 AM 發表

So what will you join?

I am withdrawing from HKICPA and ACCA. I might just keep AICPA, if at all. This is what all my friends do, long time ago.

My only fear is, if I just don't pay the subscription, they will call me up and remind me. In that case, it would be embarrassing for me to tell them on the phone that I am withdrawing. It might sound 反骨。 ACCA is no problem.

For me, they have run their course and the only benefit I get from HKICPA these days is I can get cheap tax loan.

[ 本帖最後由 dejavu2003 於 2006-11-14 05:46 AM 編輯 ]

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-11-14 10:19

引用:

原帖由 dejavu2003 於 2006-11-13 10:27 PM 發表
.

But I don't believe u need a tax loan or any loan!!

作者: dejavu2003 時間: 2006-11-14 13:50

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2006-11-14 02:19 AM 發表

But I don't believe u need a tax loan or any loan!!

I do need all kinds of loans if the interest rate is cheap. I use that in lieu of mortgages, IPOs, .... all kinds of things that generate money or save money. But of course the loans are not for spending purposes.

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-11-15 17:57

引用:

原帖由 dejavu2003 於 2006-11-14 01:50 PM 發表
I do need all kinds of loans if the interest rate is cheap. I use that in lieu of mortgages, IPOs, .... all kinds of things that generate money or save money. But of course the loans are not ...

Really? So I should perhaps consider more loans as they call me every week!

作者: dejavu2003 時間: 2006-11-15 18:39

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2006-11-15 09:57 AM 發表

Really? So I should perhaps consider more loans as they call me every week!

If I had not had the loans, I probably would have placed smaller stakes on IPOs on #3322, #3968, #272, #3983, #3918, #1398...... Any one of these IPOs would be enough to pay one full year's interest on the loan itself. On a good day, I can recover 10 years interest in 2 weeks.

I get calls everyday and usually these are bad deals. Those "0.3%... or something flat per month", I just ask them to tell me the APR, and if it's more than 5%, please don't call me again.

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-11-15 22:59

引用:

原帖由 dejavu2003 於 2006-11-15 06:39 PM 發表

Esp. now the tax loan season, good to do some leverage as the APR is really low. I got about 8 letters regarding tax loans already from different banks.

作者: dqfshhz 時間: 2006-12-3 07:35

很好啊！小女孩很可爱！！！大众喜欢啊！

作者: sfmui 時間: 2006-12-14 14:07

really a poor adv.

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-12-14 18:22

引用:

原帖由 sfmui 於 2006-12-14 02:07 PM 發表
really a poor adv.

How can it be done better??

作者: TaiLookGulf 時間: 2006-12-14 20:02

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2006-12-14 10:22 AM 發表

How can it be done better??

今年會費加左，可以整多幾個更垃圾的Ad.

作者: TaiLookGulf 時間: 2006-12-14 20:03

引用:

原帖由 TaiLookGulf 於 2006-12-14 12:02 PM 發表

今年會費加左，可以整多幾個更垃圾的Ad.

新任理事如係人渣，會費明年仲會加，加，加，加，加，加。

作者: TaiLookGulf 時間: 2006-12-14 20:05

引用:

原帖由 dqfshhz 於 2006-12-2 11:35 PM 發表
很好啊！小女孩很可爱！！！大众喜欢啊！

低能咁你日日四點鐘看tvb咪得。

得埋得得b丫，你個低低b。

作者: 愛立信 時間: 2006-12-16 10:22

THANKS........多謝樓主

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-12-18 22:23

引用:

原帖由 TaiLookGulf 於 2006-12-14 08:02 PM 發表
今年會費加左，可以整多幾個更垃圾的Ad.

Make some positive suggestions instead of saying this is bad/poor etc.!

作者: TaiLookGulf 時間: 2006-12-20 16:32

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2006-12-18 02:23 PM 發表

Make some positive suggestions instead of saying this is bad/poor etc.!

這句話，董建華成日講，仲有如果你做audit的講，個客堅持唔比你去 qualify 佢份 accounts，
同時又講:

Make some positive suggestions instead of saying this is bad/poor etc.!

你又點先。

[ 本帖最後由 TaiLookGulf 於 2006-12-20 08:38 AM 編輯 ]

作者: TaiLookGulf 時間: 2006-12-20 16:34

引用:

原帖由 TaiLookGulf 於 2006-12-20 08:32 AM 發表

這句話，董建華成日講，仲有如果你做audit的講，個客堅持唔比你去 qualify 佢份 accounts，
同時又講:

Make some positive suggestions instead of saying this is bad/poor etc.!

你又點先。

不過，如果全世界都同你同一看法，咁這個世界可以即時解決一個問題。
歡迎大家去估下，遲一點先開古。

[ 本帖最後由 TaiLookGulf 於 2006-12-20 08:39 AM 編輯 ]

作者: TaiLookGulf 時間: 2006-12-20 16:46

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2006-12-18 02:23 PM 發表

Make some positive suggestions instead of saying this is bad/poor etc.!

仲有如果叫人比「意見」只接「正面」的「意見」，
咁就唔叫比意見，

這叫做請「盲從附和」，

做得專業人仕，就應讀番咁上書，
如果人地彈兩句都頂唔順，
ＥＱ咁低，真係浪費社會資源，
就算讀私校也如是。

作者: TaiLookGulf 時間: 2006-12-20 16:50

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2006-12-14 10:22 AM 發表

How can it be done better??

I told you how "things" be done better. Save the money. Use the money to hire extra libirian so the student can study in the HKICPA library on Sunday.

Then, it would be 1000% better.

Or, cut the budget on those stupid ad. And reduce the student annual "member" fee.

咁就叫做德致。

作者: PapaBobo 時間: 2006-12-28 15:31

現在的會務都是小圈子操作,自己友玩曬.

作者: peninsula 時間: 2006-12-30 15:19

引用:

原帖由 PapaBobo 於 2006-12-28 03:31 PM 發表
現在的會務都是小圈子操作,自己友玩曬.

But cannot change as voting percentage is low.

作者: PapaBobo 時間: 2007-1-1 00:22

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2006-12-30 03:19 PM 發表

But cannot change as voting percentage is low.

Yes. I agree! I vote against them many times, but in vain.

歡迎光臨香港 Xocat Forum 討論區 (http://p.xocat.com/p/)