Board logo

標題: CP 和 CA MM 比較 [打印本頁]

作者: 港美中彎龍    時間: 2007-3-23 08:48     標題: CP 和 CA MM 比較

Are the girls in CP more "real" compared to CA? Maybe it is just me, or maybe i just haven't visited CA enough (only twice). I usually goes to CP due to the convenience of the train.  Plus a year ago, most of the attention on these types of forums were focused on CP instead of CA.

But after i tired CA (no K 場 yet), here is what i discovered:

CP
* The girls in CP, let least for me, are more passionated.. more real i guess. I visited many SN there, not only are the services top grade but I can always get the MM's telephone number (they usually insist on giving it to me) and are happy to go out on later dates, dinner or whatever

* The K 場 i visited the girls always stayed overnight. Usually till next afternoon. Well after breakfest, lunch... and even more.  

* In fact, I visited Amazon Forest K 場 last year and found this 湖南MM. Sexy, fantastic model-like body (slim) , who still visit/stay with me in GZ till this day

CA
* On the other hand.... I visited a SN here and when i ask the MM for her name, her response was: "我們在這里是叫號碼的" Ok, but her service was still great and very professional (maybe too professional).
* When to another SN and when we finished, she just showered, and walked me out. I didn't ask, but no number, no nothing. :bird: Oh well.

So guys/members, is it me or are the girls or their attitudes in these 2 places that much different?

[ 本帖最後由 港美中彎龍 於 2007-3-23 09:19 編輯 ]
作者: darkcho    時間: 2007-3-23 09:24

視乎邊間場同女既個性, cp玩法多 女做到有D公式化, ca就正常少少, 感覺比較relex, 囡囡亦freshD, 不過去開長安國際, 其它場唔知.
作者: peninsula    時間: 2007-3-23 09:57

引用:
原帖由 港美中彎龍 於 2007-3-23 08:48 發表
Are the girls in CP more "real" compared to CA? Maybe it is just me, or maybe  ...
It all depends. Luck is more important!
作者: golden8315    時間: 2007-3-23 13:42

yes~~~~~~the luchy is very important for us
作者: 忽然一Q    時間: 2007-3-23 22:23

我兩度都去過,
每次都問到電話。
不過現在主要去CA,
因為表面上要比4○○女女,
心裡面覺得較舒服。

[ 本帖最後由 忽然一Q 於 2007-3-23 22:27 編輯 ]
作者: s061209    時間: 2007-3-24 01:20

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: dw78    時間: 2007-3-24 02:45

引用:
原帖由 港美中彎龍 於 2007-3-23 08:48 發表
Are the girls in CP more "real" compared to CA? Maybe it is just me, or maybe i just haven't visited CA enough (only twice). I usually goes to CP due to the convenience of the train.  Plu ...
You are probably right. I think that most likely girls in CP are more aggressive due to competition.  CA has more Taiwanese thus the girls get more choices.  You probably notice that tips for SN is Y100 lower in CP than CA. And most CP SN do not provide two classes of girls while in CA, they try to persuade you to the model grades etc for an additional Y100 or Y200!
作者: 忽然一Q    時間: 2007-3-24 10:50

引用:
原帖由 dw78 於 2007-3-24 02:45 發表

You are probably right. I think that most likely girls in CP are more aggressive due to competition.  CA has more Taiwanese thus the girls get more choices.  You probably notice that tips for SN  ...
But the room charge for CP is more expensive than in CA.
Usually for SN in CP the room charge is 2xx but in CP it is 1XX.
作者: darkcho    時間: 2007-3-24 11:26

引用:
原帖由 忽然一Q 於 2007-3-24 10:50 發表



But the room charge for CP is more expensive than in CA.
Usually for SN in CP the room charge is 2xx but in CP it is 1XX.
ca int. $328
作者: impotence    時間: 2007-3-24 13:20

thx for your sharing ~~~
作者: hero157099    時間: 2007-3-24 14:23

thx for your sharing ~~~
作者: tjoyer    時間: 2007-3-24 22:45

海是CP的比较好,CAyu
作者: skycc    時間: 2007-3-24 22:47

无人介绍下长安国际既?我d F话几好涡...
作者: peninsula    時間: 2007-3-26 11:32

引用:
原帖由 tjoyer 於 2007-3-24 22:45 發表
海是CP的比较好,CAyu
Why??
作者: ocean4196    時間: 2007-4-7 16:22

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: pkhkg    時間: 2007-4-7 19:57

個人意見:CP SN 囡玩嘅花式較多,体力勞动較大,亦感覺上好公式化。
作者: myexplorex    時間: 2007-4-8 00:29

CP more girls willing to work harder to please the customer, CA more business like.
作者: igua    時間: 2007-4-8 11:24

very useful info.
i can't make up my mind on which to visit next week.
i think CP is the right choice after reading.
thanks.




歡迎光臨 香港 Xocat Forum 討論區 (http://p.xocat.com/p/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0