引用:

原帖由 KMY89 於 2008-9-21 13:12 發表
樹大有枯枝，一小撮壞分子做壞事，別侮辱國家和中國人，"病夫"留給你做 。

I think he refers to the social system that  " Cultured " this mindset.

引用:

原帖由 無神論狂徒 於 2008-9-21 17:44 發表
不認不認還需認。
開放以來，賺黑心錢害人的例子太多，不理如何賺錢，只要擠出奶的地方就去擠。
不理別人死活，有奶認阿娘。當年如果不是這個原因，中國未必置於如此田地。這個思想一日未清，一日都是東亞病夫。
...

It takes education and integrity to be law abiding citizens, however, this will never happen under communist rule as it is the party that determines the " law ".
Lawless = no integrity, like so many people you can find even in Hong Kong.
Lack of Education = zero knowledge, only listen to what the commie said and obey it like a slave.

引用:

原帖由 飛毛腿 於 2008-9-22 13:36 發表


Lawless ?
老兄可以托兩箱fing 頭丸, k 仔上大陸擺街邊賣
唔係就揸枝 AK47入銀行提款
睇吓點 lawless 法
呢拿, 台灣吳淑珍就可以 17次唔上法庭, 啋法庭都傻
又唔見三鹿田文華可以啋佢都傻
...

Can you do that in Hong Kong?
Bringing  Estacy and sell in Hong Kong ?
Bring an AK47 and shoot in the market ?

You can do that in China, at least there are news that people shooting AK47 in newly established dance hall a few months ago.
Lawless = commie.

If the commie do not allow you to speak, you dare not speak.
That is the case in China.
So you call the " tiger " a big case,  did you mentioned "Dr. Jiang Yanyong " who exposed the SARs cases now  "Jiang Yanyong, as a soldier, recently violated the relevant disciplineof the military. Based on relevant regulations, the military has beenhelping and educating him"? ...  

引用:

原帖由 無神論狂徒 於 2008-9-22 18:47 發表
暫有一萬二千多個嬰兒，百多個病危，死幾個。還有更多個案會被驗出。
還未計數年前受害者個案，有多少死了也不知是甚麼事。現在有多少兒童帶著腎石都是未知之數。
醫返死唔去，永久身體受損都係一條數
奶原料賣給 ...

Those innocent diary cow farmers are already hit hard.
No one collects their milk products now.  And all goes down the drain.
Secondly, the death toll are much higher than 4, in particular, if you run out of money,
which most rural farmer don't have much in the first place, the hospital will stop treatment and those babies have to go home
and died there.  Those figures won't be collect.

It is very obvious that this tragedy will repeats itself under the current system.

引用:

原帖由 飛鳥 於 2008-9-23 11:16 發表
太浪費了，快將西九改為農地，給全港中小學生耕種！

" 上山下鄉 " ...  

引用:

原帖由 COO 於 2008-9-24 10:58 發表


事件仍在發展階段。prioritywise，美國佬現在忙於自救，其他野，等下先啦~

金融衍生產品和工具，始作俑者主要是英美兩國既 i-bankers。至於是否因為咁就要美國佬負哂責任，又唔見得完全正確。因為各地方均有其 ...

If they have any thing to say about CDS they will open another thread and try to discuss it there.
They are just trying to blur the discussion this shameful issue.

引用:

原帖由 毛球 於 2008-10-7 16:34 發表

一向以來都不認同甚麼東亞病夫, 為何泱泱大國擁有源遠文化歷史卻是東亞地上的病夫? 任何民族都擁有各樣人類弱點, 就如每個人都不會完美. 中國版圖及歷史上成就冠絕東亞, 並非僥倖所得, 如果中國人是病夫, 同區眾小 ...

The mis-concept here is ignoring the most basic stabilizing mechanism in modern society - Democracy and an open society.
No leader is perfect and when leaders banned and punishes others for saying what they think, another idiot may headed all into another "cultural revolution".
Just thinking the commies will be perfect is like building castles on quick sand.
For a few years they might stand, but not for long until another came along.
To maintain trust and believes in the commies, the party had always distort news, truth and facts.
What will you do when you know the people don't elect you.

The commies only rule by lies, under certain illusions to make you believe that they are the only hope for China.
Not that I am saying they are always doing that, but they have greater intention to lie than to let the people know, just because the empowerment of their ruling is not delegated from the people, but from the coherence within their own commie party members.

引用:

原帖由 飛毛腿 於 2008-10-8 13:39 發表
>>>rule by lies, under certain illusions to make you believe that they are the only hope for China
陳死扁日吹夜吹建立台灣國, 口號 : 有夢最美, 希望相隨
布殊恐嚇國民美國正處於前所未有恐怖威脅, 要派兵去 ...

Your quoted examples are not the result of democracy.
Actually, they are examples of abuse of democracy.
Fair to say, most modern society are democratic. , did that speak for itself already ?

Can you blame the knife / the inventor of knife if someone uses it to kill another guy instead of cutting foodstuff ?

[ 本帖最後由 Rubber 於 2008-10-8 16:41 編輯 ]

誰說中共的領導人完美?
誰說民主制度最公開最真實?
Comparatively speaking issue :  Democratic society needs the vote from everybody, so they have to reveal as much in their advantage as possible, while rivals will reveal as much against them.  =>  最公開最真實.  It will be too naive to believe all that you had been told.
However, you really think the commies will tell you anything that is disadvantageous to their ruling ?  

What will you do when you want the people to elect you in a democratic society? 為民拯命獻身社會定係收買人心博取選票?
In democratic society, you make your case and try your best to persuade others

你係天真定係傻?