推介:| Loan | Investment Course | CFP course | Mutual Funds | Property Agency | Financing | Corporate Finance | Mortgage |

發新話題
打印

3328

there is law in China that limited the foreign bank holding percentage in a bank in China, so I don't think HSBC will 揪大佢 in this moment......btw totally agree with brother Cumine...P/E is way too high, it's easy to drop back in a dramatic way.

TOP

as a bank, I personal think P/E below 18 is more reason, Citibank and HSBC both below 14...

TOP

what do brothers here think of it compare to 939...which is better???

TOP

引用:
原帖由 yl_cheng 於 2006-8-30 11:44 AM 發表
I think we should not consider the PE in isolation.  We need to consider PE together with its expected rate of increase in profit.

There is a term called PEG ratio = PE / (expected rate of incre ...
mm....ic...I also want to know that, is "dividend" also a major factor for you to consider this kind of stock?

TOP

引用:
原帖由 yl_cheng 於 2006-8-31 01:58 PM 發表


Some stock valuation methods also state that we can consider dividend instead of earning when calculating the "reasonable value" of the stock.

http://www.moneychimp.com/articles/va ...
Big thanks!

TOP

發新話題


重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,本網站對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。本討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。


Copyright 1997- Xocat. All Right Reserved.