推介:| 相架 | 數碼相機 | 畢業相攝影 | 婚禮攝影 | 婚紗攝影 | 攝影器材 | 攝影課程 |

發新話題
打印

一千萬像素的數碼相機比得上傳綂的膠片相機嗎?

Thanks for all who contributed to this question.

My view is that it is difficult to answer this question without getting technicality involved.  First of all, resolution is not a direct function of number of pixels but depends on a number of factors.  The size of the sensor (CCD, CMOS) is another factor.  Due to the nature of light (which behaves both as electromagnetic waves and particles), a typical sensor consists of millions of receptors of protons.  To capture colour, a filter is used for each receptor to receive a particular colour of light (e.g. green filter for receptor to receive green light proton).  As human eyes are more acceptable to green colour, there are more green receptors than red and blue receptors in a given sensor.  

This makes very interesting result.  Consider this: what will happen if a green proton falls onto a blue receptor?  Absolutely nothing!  In a sense, that green light signal is lost.  Hence each receptor does not make a pixel but rather a pixel is obtained by interpolating a number of receptors.  

Another aspect of the receptor is that light particles behave in the manner described by quatum physics.  In essesnce, if one conducts a number of experments with the same light intensity, the number of protons received by each receptor will vary slightly, following a certain probabilistic distribution.  Hence it is the statistical average that we report for a given situation as one can never predict with certainty the eact number of protons for a given receptor.

Given such a situation, even optical lenses add to the complexity, Vgoogle has some very technical lectures on this topic as well.

However, it is still possible to make very rough and simplified calculation.  For example someone has made the following comment on Canon EOS 5D DSLR - commenting on sensor size and resolution:

"Additionally the 5D's 12.8 Megapixel resolution matches the theoretical detail of a 3000 dpi 35mm film scan which, coupled with the full-frame coverage, makes it a viable replacement for die-hard 35mm owners"  (http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon5D/index.shtml)

I hope I have shed some light on the subject.  Interesting though it may be, but is is really difficult to compare resolutuoion in a simplistic sense between a digital system and an anolog system (film).

TOP

發新話題


重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,本網站對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。本討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。


Copyright 1997- Xocat. All Right Reserved.