推介:| 觀塘外賣速遞 | 將軍澳外賣速遞 | Party 美食到會 | 汽車蓬頂維修翻身 | 雪地靴 | 羊毛鞋 | 羊毛鞋墊 | Online Food Ordering System | Pre Wedding Photographer |

發新話題
打印

拯救天星碼頭簽名

Actions of these come late for decades la.
I really don't understand how worthwhile to argue on reseving those so-called "old" remains like The Blue House, Lee Tung Street, Star Ferry.....etc etc.
How old are they????
How special are they???
How historical are they???
60 years??
100 years???
130 years???
Just go travel the world and see!!

Many real old- tasted and historical remains were demolished and got vanished one by one many decades ago~~!!!

Why our gov't did not keep the old houses where Dr Sun Yat Sen practise clinics (once was on Staunton Street, Central) and met the other 3 fds to discuss China's future (once was on Gaugh Street, Central) 100 years ago???


What I'm going to point out is not denying the kind efforts of those heritage protectionists. But the meaning of their acts is very negligible today bcoz it's now too late, and HK ppl only have to accept this cruel fact~!!
How they could be valued and attract tourism if only these houses are still here today~??!!!!

[ 本帖最後由 V.V 於 2006-11-24 12:12 PM 編輯 ]

TOP

發新話題


重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,本網站對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。本討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。


Copyright 1997- Xocat. All Right Reserved.