最近~??!!!

引用:

原帖由 Rx-Rider 於 2006-8-30 07:12 PM 發表
I read some of his writing.  For sure his work was not always perfect. No matter right or wrong, at least he got his own points and stand by it. I think on this issue he is much better than those w ...

His view-points on Chinese characters/problems are accurate.

引用:

原帖由 Dave1968 於 2006-9-5 01:36 AM 發表


his view-point on Chinese...totally western sense of value!!!

You can't deny he really discloses the ugly sides of Chinese characters.
With more understanding and connections with mainland Chinese personally and culturally during this decade, I can't agree less with him but more surprised to his accuracy~!!!!

Although he's more repeating the same ideas today.

[ 本帖最後由 V.V 於 2006-9-5 10:56 AM 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 kirk 於 2006-9-8 05:22 PM 發表
He is just telling the obvious...

but even if "obvious", who else would speak out now so high profile like him??


[ 本帖最後由 V.V 於 2006-9-8 08:22 PM 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 121518 於 2006-9-30 06:01 PM 發表
His view-points on Chinese characters/problems are accurate.

Agree
It is especially rare treasure now for one dare to disclose since all people only know how to flatter....

[ 本帖最後由 V.V 於 2006-10-3 02:10 PM 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 kenny01 於 2006-10-9 02:36 PM 發表
我覺得佢既文筆係有一手
雖然偏向西化,及感到有些為寫而寫(我覺得好多佢既作品,唔等於佢立場)
但論文章亦是有可讀性的

但缺點就係重覆太多,我諗佢唔係好適合每天交稿既寫作方式

X 2

"...本著因應自己的學識所見寫出銳利的文章呢？ "

Perhaps, he has no such burden like Lung Ying Toi because he's rather $$$ concern instead.