推介:| 網頁寄存 | 網頁設計 | 開網店 | 電郵申請 | Wordpress Hosting | 外賣平台 | 英語課程推薦 | 風水屋 | 房間風水懷孕 | Timway Testimonial | Wedding Planner | Wedding MC |

發新話題
打印

。《一個不投票給陳良心的確實理由》。

引用:
原帖由 Rubber 於 2007-11-23 09:49 發表

錯啦.
1/ 無 「法例規定」, 係對銀行 "指引",  亦唔係對客户 ?    你聽過有 "二按" 呢個名詞未?
2/ 乜你成曰唔識計數 ?  成個 loan package 係 53%.
3/ 該種二個物業一個package ...

Good Point.....

She applied, and was given the Mortgage based on two properties being used as collateral..
Also, it is the Bank's decision to give her that Mortgage.....
How came there is no mention of any name of the Bank Officer(s) who approved it up to this point......
May be this person is still very important......


In the case of "阿松", it was his decision to rush to buy the car and avoiding the new tax that he knew.....

For people who asked why the Bank did not give them the same package.... they have to look into the mirror ......
and see what kind of qualification they process ... or do they have the same or similar qualification as 陳太.....


相關搜索目錄: 銀行

TOP

發新話題


重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,本網站對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。本討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。


Copyright 1997- Xocat. All Right Reserved.