Funny to see people trying to compare apple and orange...   

引用:

原帖由 理魯竇 於 2008-6-9 18:16 發表


當然唔可以比較，
同四川相比，
香港呢次災情算小兒科啦。

救災鮋野唔係得個講字，
唔該之前係度扮晒專家  D 人以後唔好再紙上談兵咯。

You might be interested to quote the comparison that Hong Kong needs 28 days to savage the sunken Ukrainian tug boat without any survivors and in turn helped to detain China's salvage vessel....  


Ooops.. survivor, I meant those that cannot escape in the first time... of course there were some lucky guys being able to get off the boat when she sank.

[ 本帖最後由 Rubber 於 2008-6-9 18:44 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 c0707323 於 2008-6-9 19:10 發表
Is it funny? what a pity!!!

No. It is never funny to see people died.
It is only funny to see people comparing unrelated tragedy and building theories over that.

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2008-6-9 18:09 發表

How so? With earthquake?

Ooops.. missed your post.

Yeah.. Earthquake in Szechuan and the mud slide in Hong Kong.

1/  Bringing personnel to the site ?
      What use is helicopter when the fireman can arrive timely ?

2/  Equipment appropriate for the job ?
     Do the fireman use the appropriate equipment ?  If bare hand is, then bare hand, you don't expect them to use explosive to blast the slab of wall away.
I have no comment in Szechuan as usual, because I have no idea about how much damage is there.
     My only comment so far about Szechuan earthquake is when I said pictures of concrete was mixed of river bed rocks ( which were as smooth as an egg, and hence were no good to attach concrete)  or slabs constructed of iron grate/rod ( strictly speaking wire ).

3/  Best option ?
      In Szechuan, at least there are many sites to explore and short of man power, the first option is obviously save theose easiest to save first.
      In Hong Kong, the duty is to save THAT couple, so no matter how slim the chance or how difficult the task, the FOCUS is them.

So there were obviously no merits or ground to compare.