好戰分子們, 先想想南沙, 釣魚臺, 再想想中俄, 中印邊境之爭
打? 好啊, 最好一併打回來, 最好連外蒙也"收"回來, 豈不妙哉?

香港的熱血青年們, 係冇機會參軍的(連志願軍都不成)
所以拋頭顱灑熱血諸事, 誠然冇佢哋分也
故此, 大可大言炎炎講打打殺殺, 難怪, 難怪

引用:

原帖由 vinka 於 2007-3-24 22:54 發表



問題是聯合國和世界上二百多個國家不再承認中華民國是一個主權國家，中華民國已經自動喪失了聯合國會籍資格，有怎麼會還有否決權呢？   

這不是自欺欺人是什麼？  

中華民國係聯合國創立成員國之一, 而擁有否決權係自然不過之事(因為當時只有中華民國先係合法被國際承認嘅政府, 中共嗰陣重係地大人多但國際地位極低嘅政權, 否則何以會內地爆發大饑荒, 大把人都食唔飽穿唔暖之際, 重會向阿爾巴尼亞之類小國輸出糧食同金援呢? 就係為爭取小國支持而已)
後來係中華民國自願退出聯合國, 因蔣中正自言"漢賊不兩立", 忘了嗎?
以今非古? 你都好攪笑吓

For reference:
Proving Non-Existence: When an arguer cannot provide the evidence for his claims, he may challenge his opponent to prove it doesn't exist (e.g., prove God doesn't exist; prove UFO's haven't visited earth, etc.). Although one may prove non-existence in special limitations, such as showing that a box does not contain certain items, one cannot prove universal or absolute non-existence, or non-existence out of ignorance. One cannot prove something that does not exist. The proof of existence must come from those who make the claims.

希望討論唔好去到上面呢一步