推介:| 懷孕輻射 | 頭暈輻射 | 失眠輻射 | 頭疼輻射 | 腦腫瘤輻射 | 記憶障礙輻射 | 耳損傷輻射 | 抑鬱輻射 | Celine Bags | 嬰兒用品 | Loewe Bag |

發新話題
打印

曾蔭權應向胡錦濤献計將大陸孕婦經黃崗口岸送羅湖醫院產子。

引用:
原帖由 ivan99 於 2007-1-23 04:07 PM 發表


愈去得地方多,愈係閱歷多,愈覺得香港最民
主自由,直情去到人權泛濫地步。
真難想像有人話香港冇民主、自由、人權背後的動機。
香港自由同人權係好高.

但民主就唔入流

TOP

我見倒好多人係咁怪終審法院判莊豐源案. 其實有幾多個人睇過該案o既Judgement呢?

該案的judgement可以o係港大網站找到.

以我睇法o係該案終審法院已經盡力偏幫政府. o係審案時有考慮該案會否令大量大陸孕婦來港產子. 但係我o地當年o既入境處處長o係終審法院度答:

唔會! (後來事實數字係證明佢錯o左)

所以先至會有咁樣的判決.

而當年o既入境處處長就係李少光. 而家竟然升官做保安局局長

而我從來冇見過傳媒有人提呢一點

真係唔明o的傳媒係做咩:bird::bird:

TOP

引用:
原帖由 ngtungsee 於 2007-1-23 05:28 PM 發表


比起97回歸前,民主已經好好多.起碼都有個小圈子選特首,而特首又係香港人.以前英女皇派邊個英國人來做港督就邊個,唔須要香港人舉手,連小圈子選舉都冇.
個小圈子度真係選咩? 做場戲之嘛. 江澤民當年一開聲, 即刻自動當選. 事實上咪又係中央欽點.

TOP

7.2 The figures compiled by the Immigration Department

In submitting that the suggested test based on substantive (that is, real) effect is satisfied on the facts, the Director relies on the figures compiled by his Department which have been put before the Court. According to these figures, during the 43 months between 1 July 1997 to 31 January 2001, a total of 1991 Chinese citizens born in Hong Kong would qualify as permanent residents within art. 24(2)(1) if the Director's contention on that article were rejected. Their mothers were illegal immigrants, holders of two way permits or transient overstayers and their fathers were either temporarily or not resident in Hong Kong. This amounts to about 46 children per month, about 555 children per annum.

On the basis of these figures, the Director accepts that there is no indication that a decision against him will give rise to an immediate influx of persons from the Mainland.

In our view, one can go further. On the basis of these figures for the past 43 months, there could not be said to be any significant risk to Hong Kong resulting from a decision against the Director.

The figure of 1991 Chinese citizens should be contrasted with a total of 22,850 Chinese citizens born in Hong Kong during this period who would qualify even if the Director's contention is upheld. Although their mothers were illegal immigrants or holders of two way permits or transient overstayers, they would qualify because their fathers were either settled or were permanent residents in Hong Kong.

我用google再search返, o係港府網站度搵得返出o黎.
http://legalref.judiciary.gov.hk ... p;FN=&currpage=

TOP

引用:
原帖由 無聊居士 於 2007-1-24 22:05 發表


限定綜援要十八歲後才可申請,未滿十八要由永久居民的父母代為申請,問題已一了百了,根本唔使搞咁多野,而家係綜援制度出問題,唔係邊境入境管制出問題(當然入境處有權唔俾任何人士入境而不須任何解釋),何必要自毀 ...
如果我冇記錯, 父母唔係港人而申請綜援o既個案so far只有十幾宗.

其實綜援至今唔係太大問題, 佔用醫療資源就係大問題

TOP

引用:
原帖由 kenny01 於 2007-1-23 18:02 發表


每個人都可以有所猜測
我本人就"絕對唔相信"
雖然人口小既澳門響呢方面有優勢

響經濟角度來說,亦接近不可能
睇人地好,唔代表人地無問題既
澳門GDP per capita同香港已經差唔多.

澳門得幾十萬人又有大量賭場, 人均收入可以追過香港唔出奇.

溫馨提示: 香港GDP per capita已經微高於日本

TOP

引用:
原帖由 ivan99 於 2007-1-24 09:29 發表


香港真民主就唔入流,但有的是假民主,假民主癱瘓所有大型基建,令香港經濟陷入萬劫不復深淵,當鄰近地區所有大型工程,娛樂設施已建好之日,香港仍處於諮詢,再諮詢階段,工人冇工開,伸手攞綜援,中產 ...
咁都要抽水

香港真係有雙普選的話, 我覺得好大機會會減綜援.

你試o下隨街問十條友, 睇o下有幾多個認為要踢走窮人新移民同減綜援

香港得頂多得幾十萬人領綜援, 一人一票冇咩可能唔輸俾做到隻狗咁o既大多數港人.

[ 本帖最後由 voltaren 於 2007-1-29 21:41 編輯 ]


相關搜索目錄: 工程 娛樂

TOP

發新話題


重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,本網站對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。本討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。


Copyright 1997- Xocat. All Right Reserved.