For goodwill, the gov't or tourist board should do something to compensate the tourist (say a free hotel reception for the next trip). In any case, it is small sum (much less than $145k insurance!?)

The tourist board is full of high paid rubbish. The govt as well (those deputy, political asst etc are also said more than done rubbish, just for the sake of serving their "master")

引用:

原帖由 kenny01 於 2008-6-20 09:57 發表
"漢普頓酒店並非酒店業主聯會轄下會員，而入住者又非旅行團旅客"

呢個先係main point喎, 咁是但一間賓館執左政府又使唔使理呢, 公家錢用來幫助投資失利既地方又合唔合理呢? 一係咪好似旅遊業協會咁, ...

安置旅客跟“幫助投資失利既地方”完全是两件不同的事!

安置了旅客，对“投資失利”的人有什么幫助？ 楼照收,旅客可以照舊claim漢普頓!

是但一間賓館執左应该不理，因为政府没有牵涉在内，但这次是法庭repossess时poorly executed!

说到尾，是反应迟钝，政府里面没有做事的人，只有搅“政治”的！

Norman Chan is a typical 搅屎棍!

香港以前是做事人多，搅“政治”人少。

现在的老板搅“政治”上脑，歪风弥漫，相信很快便会被大陆赶过，2017年前于深圳合拼