引用:

原帖由 CAB 於 2008-10-26 16:21 發表
Agreed.

HK education is a complete failure. At my time, those top graduates will work in big firms as trainees, become lawyers, doctors, bankers, accountants etc...only those with the poorest acade ...

Agreed that the education system of HK is totally failure, and it is the main sources of the problem - poor quality of our education
As most of the elites have already been working for the commercial and govt sectors, not being as a teacher.

引用:

原帖由 mark+gor 於 2008-10-27 23:49 發表

個d所謂SGM,做又4雞幾,唔做又4雞幾，考績制度欠奉。咁既制度，香港教育點會有進步？
其實成個pay system 應該要revise, 人工應該要和performance 掛鈎，與seniority 不是必然有關。不過呢樣野根本無可能

如果人工要和performance 掛鈎, 就會有人說造成奉承文化.
根本pay system 與潮流脫身節

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2008-10-28 21:55 發表

So you have second-rate teachers?

My answer is yes.
Back to the square one, the root cause is most of the outstanding students have to select studying at prestige universities rather than at teacher education institutes.So we can imagine what's the outcome of the quality of our teachers.

引用:

原帖由 mark+gor 於 2008-10-29 10:58 發表

Partially agree.
However,  a person with good academic acheivement doesn't mean that he or she will be a good teacher. Similarly, a person having marginal pass in HKCE and studying in HKIEd doesn' ...

Also partially agree.

"person with good academic acheivement doesn't mean that he or she will be a good teacher"  & "person having marginal pass in HKCE and studying in HKIEd doesn't mean he or she does not have the potential to become a good teacher.

Of course, we cannot rule out this possiblity. But I believe this is not the general case.  If we look at the result of the language proficiency assessment for teachers, we will have a question mark on their quality.