推介:| 網頁寄存 | 網頁設計 | 開網店 | 電郵申請 | Wordpress Hosting | 外賣平台 | 英語課程推薦 | 風水屋 | 房間風水懷孕 | Timway Testimonial | Wedding Planner | Wedding MC |

發新話題
打印

以言入罪 又一新例 (胡佳被判 3 年半 )

引用:
原帖由 Rubber 於 2008-4-5 22:36 發表
所有支持垃圾政權的...  你有何想法呢 ?

***********

【明報專訊】北京法院以煽動顛覆國家政權罪判處內地著名維權人士胡佳    入獄3年半。正在羅馬尼亞訪問的美國    國務卿賴斯昨日指有關判決結果「非常令 ...
Thank you very much for posting the original article over here
so i can have a chance to have a look over this
otherwise tis even not bother me

however
after reading through the whole passage
i have to say
please give me a break

i would doubt if my wu has even been graduated from high school
as his article is so naive

most probably
he has received money to make such delivery
& that's why he was got into prison

shall you go over any website inside china
tis so easy to see such similar views everywhere

what's so special of this mister's point of view?

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Rubber 於 2008-4-14 11:31 發表


Whether he received money or not is not the main point.
I'm sorry to state that it does make the difference.
Where is the source of fund would absolutely be the key.
Just like the case of Mr Ching (right spelling? the journalist who has just been released from jail recently). maybe Ching is a patriot however can he be so 'careless (for his own sake)' to get himself involved in such a mess? and would receive money even he such an old hand couldn't smell where would be the problem?

By providing services in order to receive funds from foreign agency is always an offence to national security no matter this happens to china, england, america or where else, isn't it?

The point here is.  I don't buy mr wu was being put into jail because of his opinion.  
As I stated before this can be found manywhere through out the internet.

For your claim on those side events, you don't feel comfortable when you see such happenings as you apply your living standard to them.  may i suggest you to spend some time to get around in china. don't go by flight but by ground transport on your own.  you would understand this is pretty much due to general social development standard rather than an offence of rights to a particular person.  I am not meaning all these are right things but they can only be resolved by general overall development.  And it takes time without any short cut.

TOP

發新話題


重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,本網站對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。本討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。


Copyright 1997- Xocat. All Right Reserved.