引用:

原帖由 至尊豪庭9 於 2008-10-5 10:09 發表
薪2 ...

Terrible. Too low!

引用:

原帖由 至尊豪庭9 於 2008-10-6 19:19 發表
傾緊,唔夠可以加,唔好心急!

OK la - start from a base first.

引用:

原帖由 CAB 於 2008-10-7 04:27 發表
Funny...d公司講紧炒人
and these people are asking for min. wages....

2 different issues!

引用:

原帖由 CAB 於 2008-10-7 13:54 發表
炒左班副局长，政治助理 （又”副“又”助理“，单是个名已经话俾你知是冗员！）.

Excellent idea!

引用:

原帖由 理魯竇 於 2008-10-7 23:29 發表
我都係打工仔，
。

Not all employers are bad.

引用:

原帖由 public59 於 2008-10-8 22:37 發表
What's acceptable hour rate from your point of view?

At least $40. Now, things are so expensive and economy is going down the tube.

引用:

原帖由 Rainybreeze 於 2008-10-11 20:25 發表
物價同經濟係的而且確既事實, 但係$40 最低工資係咪答案?
遠既, 高地價房屋問題, 有人曾經想用8萬5公屋來做答案.
近既, 尊貴既黃議員, 叫取消強積金, 就每個香港人張來都會退休保障. 人口老化會點? d錢響邊到 ...

There must be a basis.

引用:

原帖由 public59 於 2008-10-12 01:10 發表
It makes sense to have a higher min hour rate if things are so expensive.
But if the economy is going down, is it still necessary to compulsory set a higher min hour rate? It should be determined ...

At least, something that is reasonable and acceptable to all.

引用:

原帖由 Rubber 於 2008-10-13 17:51 發表
I have to inform you that your beloved commies in PRC also practice min wage policy...

So now people are better off!

引用:

原帖由 moxfactor 於 2008-10-13 18:18 發表
in that case, is there equal "positive" effect on employment or inflation?  i see this as merely a play on words, propaganda if you will.  pay raise for minimum wagers will only promote the deteri ...

Yes, happy and more productive.

引用:

原帖由 public59 於 2008-10-14 21:18 發表
But loyalty and happiness are not easy to measure.
It seems they are luxury to many owners of SME

Yes, very subjective indeed.

引用:

原帖由 Rainybreeze 於 2008-10-16 16:28 發表


七萬廠家倒閉2000萬人被炒  ...

That's not to do with wage policies.

引用:

原帖由 kcpw0n 於 2008-10-30 18:32 發表
至尊豪廷9發表咁嘅標題  "拉9條老坑啦,好多街坊幫阿人,唔係阿人(手禁)住,班街坊實行打能死條老坑"
都可以lor!!!! 叫佢 " mind your words " 慳番d Gas 啦!!!!

Let there be peace!