¤Þ¥Î:
ì©«¥Ñ zagong ©ó 2009-9-10 18:41 µoªí
I would like to commend Whitekitty on his point about protecting the interests of the girls. I don't visit these forums much, but did a number of months back when several girls I knew were fired from Lotto and wondered whether their misfortune was due to on-line discussions. I discovered that their numbers were posted in a not-so-secret "secret code" (post 880); they were fired shortly after the code's posting.
Thanks for your commendation.
You mean a member (messenger) posted these numbers 586668116 in May 2008 in post 880? Well, I can tell you:
58 left Sauna Lotto of her own accord; she wasn't fired;
68 was fired
much later, probably after carmanlamlam reported her doing hj for him (well, I am not saying his report must have been the cause of her dismissal);
116 was fired in autumn (if my memory doesn't fail me) 2008, not in May. I have reason to believe that some customer betrayed her by telling the manager face to face something that had happened;
also a member here did report her doing hj (post 948) .
As far as I am concerned, in the days when I used to report in this thread, though I sort of helped make certain bgs there known to give fractional VAS, my reports, I am sure,
never contributed to the dismissal of any of them, though they may have sensitised the bgs themselves.
In the early days, after I reported about the early bg 13, another bg became sort of jealous and threatened to print and circulate those reports at the time in the bgs' rest room!
(though she never did so).
But 13 was fired much later, after I became inactive last year, some time before 116 was fired. It remains
unclear/uncertain even now
whether 13 really deserved her punishment,
or the management (or manager) actually 'did her away/dispensed with her' by
wrongly accusing her of crossing his baseline.
I know the manager is reading these recent posts of ours-----I venture to raise the issue here: Was there concrete evidence against 13 at that time?
Did she really do the wrong thing?
h:" />h:" />h:" />h:" />h:" /> Was someone abusing his power?
h:" />h:" />h:" />h:" />h:" />
Another case: I once reported a bg 9X who was very nice to me and was good at the 'soft skill' (ie fractional VAS and being gentle, sweet). She was subsequently fired after being found doing hj to a customer (but the incident was never reported here).
I also
hinted at another bg's breasts touching my head/face while she bent her back to massage my chest. I used figure of speech, 'sugar candy' as I chatted amusedly with another member here about it.
He had also enjoyed 'sugar candy' from her before. This candy bg is still now working at Lotto (!).
What I want to say is: amid possible criticisms in those days, I still managed to avoid crossing the line in reporting. There can be different ways to report, without really
specifying 'nipples sucking' or fondling with your dick!
Finally what about the 66 of 2008?
I reported her doing «e¦C¸¢......
in private I informed certain brothers what she did
beyond serving «e¦C¸¢. Thereafter, other members were
discreet in reporting
about her, without causing her any risk (apart from any that she incurred herself). But afterwards, a member (not known to me and not in my confidence) did report her crossing the line.
Still, 66 could keep her job. Also, she was known to ask customers for a tip of $300 (and I think sometimes she got even more).
She was never fired, but she left of her own accord.
I venture to ask: Was the management really unaware of her crossing the line??
Was partiality in her favour involved? Was the disciplining of bgs
consistent and fair ?
At the end of the day, it is clear that a bg is at the mercy of the management, even if she never does cross the line.
By the time I became inactive last year, I felt really bad about the situation.
I really wished that this thread had never been initiated.
I hated to have started it. There are so many things not in our control.
Now my digging old things up and mentioning numbers...........the numbers are meaningless by now,
the bgs involved are now working elsewhere with different identities, or out of the industry.
[
¥»©«³Ì«á¥Ñ ¥Õ¿ß¨à ©ó 2009-9-11 12:47 ½s¿è ]