引用:
原帖由 bb3808 於 2011-9-14 13:35 發表
I think If we guys report the facts, we should not 報喜不報憂. In fact no criticism no improvement.
The ideal situation is a specific complaint about bg/staff menber (with bg number/staff name specified) is responded to by
another post that presents another side. Then it is up to the individual to decide how much he believes in the complaint.
Take as an example in this thread
post 4062, followed by
post 4071...... Otherwise it is so hard to decide whether a complaint is truthful, whether it is fair to the bg/staff member in question.
Note that takashi11 posted once and for all a complaint (post 4062) on 27 August.
He has never posted again to further clarify any details
when his complaint was queried. On the one hand as long as members do not harm individual bg/staff member,
I do not want to censor anything. But if you post a complaint and then never come back to answer questions for clarification,
you are not responsible enough, merely exercising your so called freedom of speech just when you like it.
Note that all the same, I have not censored takashi11's complaint.
[
本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2011-9-14 13:55 編輯 ]