引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-21 11:39 發表

You use the famous quote again.
It's not necessary now to know who Icy Wong is. She is just a typical example of failing to step into the industry of entertainment

Stereotype.

:loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes:

Flawless Karen!!!

冬至 is kind of the same thing as Thanksgiving?

引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-21 19:06 發表
Sort of.
The hidden meanings of the festivals are quite different from each other. However, people go back home to have dinner with their families on winter solstice, like how the Americans act on Th ...

Thanks for the info! Would definitely enjoy the family dinner tomorrow.

Wow.... :loveeyes:

引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-21 22:33 發表

I am afraid that it won't be Karen who hosts the weather report tomorrow.

Come on, not enough evidence to prove it.

引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-21 22:45 發表
Thus I am not trying to make an inference but a conjecture.

What's your evidence then?

引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-21 23:04 發表

She mentioned the winter solstice today. However, the festival is not today but tomorrow.

She could, and should, have postponed the introduction to the festival to tomorrow, but she didn't.

Th ...

Ha...she was just reading the script, the content has nothing to do with her.

引用:

原帖由 richard07 於 2010-12-21 23:59 發表
I have learnt some new vocabs from their conversations!! Especially from 中山, I think that can enhance my reading ability of english, I haven't comprehended some words they have used before I had use ...

Your vocab is there, your main problem is sentence structure.

引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-22 12:40 發表
Karen真係好靚

http://i1197.photobucket.com/albums/aa423/phoen ...

Yea...we all know she is 好靚....













Karen真係好靚 :loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes:

引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-22 12:59 發表

What elsa can I say as prologue except that...Karen was really amazing last night.

Karen was really amazing, Karen is really amazing and Karen will continue be amazing. :loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes:

引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-22 14:38 發表

Vocab is important, but grammar is crucial. You may double-check before you submit an English post, and see if there are any grammatical mistakes. I am sure you can learn more from that.

Read what you write first, see if it's fluent or not.

:loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes:

Gosh....

引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-22 19:51 發表
Impeccable, invincible, invulnerable!

http://i1197.photobucke ...

Come on now....:loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes:

引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-23 12:41 發表
Still some more above...
What can I say...No earthly words are enough to describe Karen's beauty.

Every pages of Karen and Connie are full of :loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes::loveeyes:

引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-23 12:50 發表

Let's continue the icon then
Karen:
You are so beautiful to me
Can't you see
You're everything I hope for
You're everything I need :lo ...

Abusing the

引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-23 12:56 發表

The icon shows our passion and affection for Karen.

I abused it only for Karen and Connie , occasionally for Carol.

引用:

原帖由 lwy1314 於 2010-12-23 13:04 發表

i am  asking Mr.Harbaugh

I beg your pardon then.

引用:

原帖由 中山樵 於 2010-12-23 13:33 發表

唔好講到我對珍妮同紫盈咁差
我係真心欣賞珍妮嘅內涵同紫盈嘅可愛架

How can you judge Jenny's connotation when you don't even know her?

引用:

原帖由 richard07 於 2010-12-23 13:44 發表

講實力
珍妮的確很好..
和文采不相百仲!!
你應該把2人平排..
但紫盈實力明顯較她們弱..
你不能單憑她的可愛
而把排得比文采前!!

Why not? No contradiction at all. In fact, Jenny's English oral is far away from being consider as a native speaker.

引用:

原帖由 richard07 於 2010-12-23 13:56 發表

According to 中山's point of view, he ranks all of anchors bases on their talent and strength basis!! Do you think that Wendy's talent is lesser then Jenny?? Connie's talnet is better than Wendy?? I ...

Wendy>Connie>Jenny

And no, I am not being bias.

[ 本帖最後由 Harbaugh 於 2010-12-23 14:03 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 lwy1314 於 2010-12-23 14:00 發表

Black is your Spelling Mistake
Red is your Grammar Mistake

You missed 2 more grammatical mistakes.

According to 中山's point of view, he ranks all of anchors based on their talent and strength!! Do you think that Wendy's talent is weaker then Jenny?? Connie's talent is better than Wendy?? If you think that is true, I will accept your point of view!!