引用:

原帖由 polelw 於 2006-8-17 04:01 AM 發表



he he..i can understand how u feel bro...

from what i know one reason why they keep the price up is because they want to eliminate "certain" type of clients.....just like OPS a ...

I agree with you, brother. Clear market position is very important to run a business. If they want to keep the sauna as a high end position, then, it is no reason to down the price anymore. In most of time, reducing the price means down grade of service, food quality, and staff morale. You can not serve all kind of customers with a single offer. If the sauna can really provide "value of money"(not added value) services, they can keep their position in market. By the way, I absoultly agree that paying tips $20-30 as tip tp bgs is quite unacceptable, if the bg is really not up to your standard, you should change her as early as possible, instead of using this excuse not to pay tip. B:hug:

引用:

原帖由 polelw 於 2006-8-17 06:47 AM 發表




to be honest i doubt there is any 100 percentage pure saunas these days...but dont get me wrong...what i am saying is that it's only the extra effort for a few bgs...not all...so u may or m ...

Well, it is hardly to have an absolute pure sauna in HK. I even heard that there is half plane service in Hoi Bun Sauna ?! But if a sauna, some bgs offer special service to some customers may also make a bad example to customers, and will encourage customers to force / request other bgs do same thing for them.

其實每次去Sauna, 消費如何大家都心中有數, 亦有budget, locker 仔及水池的tips相對整張單都是小數 ($20 +$ $ 20)。要明白一點, locker 及水池都主要靠tips為主要收入。既然去得sauna消費又何必近近計較三四十元呢 ? 要知道人家招呼你都頗為難受,例如"挽"鞋, 抹身等。簡單講句, 揾食啫 !

引用:

原帖由 hktigerwoods 於 2006-8-23 01:50 AM 發表
i think RPS is totally vege... dont waste your money to invest and go there if you want to get VAS
waste money
i prefer go other place

Agree

I believe the company policy do not change, but there are some bgs offer VAS to certain customers only. Unlike Sea Crest, Wai Gor always implies the bgs can give you special.

引用:

原帖由 wilson444 於 2006-8-28 06:33 AM 發表
推介早班，26 及 72。
做得不錯，是正經的。

Anyone know #63 ? Any comment ?

引用:

原帖由 wilson444 於 2006-9-6 12:23 PM 發表
去了深圳幾天，昨天又不能登入，
所以現在才能回覆。
亦已 pm 各位。

昨天又發現早班 60 不錯，
大胸，又柔。

因這場從九月開始，
要求技師每月有 20 mark 單，
因此更多 VAS。哈哈！

Please do not spread wrong information, I think the sauna will not admit bgs provide VAS because they have to comit " mark order". It still depends on the bgs only.

引用:

原帖由 cool03 於 2006-9-7 12:21 PM 發表


My experience there is if VAS is served automatically, that will be fine
and I'm more than happy to accept,
If not in auto-gear mode, tell the bg to serve VAS as a gesture of personal
r ...

If VAS is so important to you, why don't you got to plane sauna instead of vegi sauna ?

引用:

原帖由 ken789 於 2006-9-28 09:37 PM 發表
That place is as large as 3-4 medium size sauna.forum.timway.comj%@        C1Q}'f
C
I heard that the sauna is run by the proprietor of the property!forum.timway.comi"V,t2a5G:s#[jpZ,JL ...

What are you talking about ?

引用:

原帖由 tintintintin2 於 2006-11-30 04:48 PM 發表
公開此事只想說這店雖還未轉形，但已不似以前般純

I think it is very difficult to find a 100 % pure vegi sauna in HK. It should be an individual case.

引用:

原帖由 garylock 於 2006-12-6 06:28 PM 發表
recently changed owner and management.  Still not running smoothly ... Also, though customer is not that manager, service is not too good and the managress only talked to some customers and treat o ...

聽聞好似轉了以前帝湖的管理人, 如果真間場老細就無運行啦, 睇以前帝湖就知, 原本好好地, 都搞到小貓三四隻, 員工士氣又低, 真無眼睇

引用:

原帖由 garylock 於 2006-12-7 12:20 PM 發表
Superheman,

that is exactly what I worried and what I see in my last few visit - poor service, very few people there even during peak hours like 7-9pm.  He!!!

呢間場老細可謂唔衰攞嚟衰, 甘多人唔揾會揾着呢班人, 唉

[quote]原帖由 paul+wong 於 2006-12-7 05:28 PM 發表
唉，帝湖班人做，點做呀？！

唔該減小�鑝ocker仔，請個班休息室女仔，�M番班醒目經理啦。其實個場真係硬件一流，女仔亦都唔錯，估唔到九流管理真係可以拖死成個場。


Agree ! The boss must consider this point !

[quote]原帖由 paul+wong 於 2006-12-7 05:28 PM 發表
唉，帝湖班人做，點做呀？！

唔該減小�鑝ocker仔，請個班休息室女仔，�M番班醒目經理啦。其實個場真係硬件一流，女仔亦都唔錯，估唔到九流管理真係可以拖死成個場。


Agree ! The boss must consider this point !

Why there are so many people bad mouth this sauna here ?

引用:

原帖由 apple444 於 2007-2-13 09:14 PM 發表

甘大獲,講下笑咋嗎,我和我朋友剛買了套票,都是有朋友說那處吾錯,我和朋友第一次去的,覺得服務環境都唔錯,只是我的技師老一點,我朋友的技師就幾好,但覺得有貴賓房,又有電腦notebook,都幾高級又多嘢食,便買 ...

I think there is a disput between 2 groups of managment. It is seems that they bring the quarrel to this forum.

港島區二大桑拿,因租約問題會於一年後左右被迫結業 ? Which 2 saunas ? As I know the biggest shareholder is Ma Ah Mou, the King of 14 seats mini bus. Even, RPS business is not good, but he still get rent. Therefore, he has no pressure to close the sauna.

引用:

原帖由 apple444 於 2007-3-2 12:55 AM 發表

負
真係比Paul 兄一言驚醒,以前的舊管理層好似又係股東,又係港島某大桑拿的股東,這邊管理唔好,長期虧本,那邊賺錢的又即將結業,皇室的管理又被人取代,甘最正的解決方法,當然是賺錢的續繼有得做,虧本的結業,甘收 ...

Fanastic ! I believe you are very close with the boss or senior management of RPS