己所不欲，勿施於人.  It is a norm/culture not disclosing any privacy information... but he surely breaks the law here...

我問過律師朋友, 如果佢未得同意而公開別人資料, 就算係從公開地方得來, 都屬犯法 !

引用:

原帖由 車_長 於 2007-8-16 19:29 發表
then ...how about ban me reason ?

I'm already very tired to state it once again...
There are very strong reasons that loksiu is troubling our forum to make us die and those who affiliate with him are highly suspected... especially on that thread... if you insist that you're not affiliate with him AND you don't agree with his doings... his wrong doings... PM me... you see, I've already unbanned many of my friends... they are really my friends... my heart broke when I ban my friend... but now I'm not sure who is my friend... I'm so sad about this... I want thihs forum to be better, not worse, but his signature already clearly state what is in his mind...

引用:

原帖由 車_長 於 2007-8-16 19:39 發表


if u can , please checked back that "age17 c clock"  thread, what i am posting there .

i just want to know what's reason to ban me . not to want you unban me !

I repeat and repeat, PM me is the only way to solve your problem... if any...
I might have banned the wrong persons... I admit, but I have very strong motivation to unban those who are innocent... it's like you find your hand being poisoned and at that moment, what you can think of is to cut out of your hand so that I can still survive... I might have cut the wrong tissues, but luckily, this is a technical world and something can be resumed...

引用:

原帖由 癲巴 於 2007-8-16 19:44 發表

我係brasco,
我諗你一定唔會當我係朋友, 尋日同你講得好地地, 跟住用"shout, shout, shout"�鼤z由ban埋我. 我都唔知我尋晚有邊個post出現過你所謂��"shout"....

PM me la...

[quote]原帖由 xocatII 於 2007-8-16 19:44 發表


'this is a technical world and something can be resumed'


I think the world we operate in is not only techical but also meant to be rational and predictable procedurally.

Just a comment, not a suggestion or a criticism either.

引用:

原帖由 xocatII 於 2007-8-16 19:44 發表


I repeat and repeat, PM me is the only way to solve your problem... if any...
I might have banned the wrong persons... I admit, but I have very strong motivation to unban those who are innoce ...

大版主, 恕我唔係好明, 點解大版主咁強調要用pm去解決問題呢, 公開係度傾又有乜問題?

事無不可對人言, 解決問題同發表意見如果真係要pm來pm去的話, 咁你整呢個網站意見箱/常見問題既版面又有咩用呢, 你大可以出個thread公告所有會員任何意見都以pm形式去同你發表, 咁我地一定會跟住個rules去做!

我只係想講我有疑惑既地方, 如果大版主真係覺得我係度搞事的話, 就請你ban左我啦! 我無話可說......

事件來到今天 , 那個形勢比人弱一眼就看到 , 有人真係唔上來唔得架 , XOCATII放膽去做吧。我相信求你去重開戶口的有 , 轉個名字再上來 , 跟回規矩做的人也會有 , 在這個情況下 , 你做的事十分正確。

大版主，我只想講句：有容乃大呀!!
當初舊版你倡議 "無為而治" 科林一切既秩序都可以好平衡同和諧

註釋：
君有志於道的，也有志於非道的，更有志於道而誤以非道為道的，所以臣不可以唯順是賴。
但是不要順的結果，或則遭貶，或則革職，甚至慘死，歷史上所見多有。
於是，君主無為，成為比較有效的方式。
天子無為於上，使賢相有為於下，就是無為而治的原則。

時至今日，除非你唔係當初大家所認識既蝙蝠俠，否則，你既理念應該已經扭曲��

引用:

原帖由 萬寧 於 2007-8-17 00:15 發表
大版主，我只想講句：有容乃大呀!!
當初舊版你倡議 "無為而治" 科林一切既秩序都可以好平衡同和諧

註釋：
君有志於道的，也有志於非道的，更有志於道而誤以非道為道的，所以臣不可以唯順是賴。
但 ...

「除非你唔係當初大家所認識既蝙蝠俠」

手法與言詞之不相同，令我也有同感

有冇聽過 not guilty until proven.

謝謝萬寧, 句 idiom 應該係 " innocent until proven guilty". 上面果句因為小弟英文唔好, 用左自己chinglish.

引用:

原帖由 俞添 於 2007-8-16 23:43 發表

更改發言不再玩恐嚇 , 這是一件好事 , 要是這個網站有一個月的備份 , 誰要走出現實世界還是未知之數 。

引用:

原帖由 superfans 於 2007-8-17 08:32 發表


更改發言不再玩恐嚇 , 這是一件好事 , 要是這個網站有一個月的備份 , 誰要走出現實世界還是未知之數 。

兄台是否在挑釁?

引用:

原帖由 GK 於 2007-8-17 11:16 發表

我覺得你而家o係度潑火要引起罵戰喎
你用意何在?
事件發生後, 你呢d門口狗就出分身出黎潑火呀? 要ban就ban呢d狗啦

女俠不要動氣

引用:

原帖由 GK 於 2007-8-17 11:16 發表

我覺得你而家o係度潑火要引起罵戰喎
你用意何在?
事件發生後, 你呢d門口狗就出分身出黎潑火呀? 要ban就ban呢d狗啦

咁妳估唔估到佢係邊個既分身 ?