引用:

原帖由 一枝公 於 2008-3-24 11:55 發表
人民日報及中央電視台最好！晩晩播藏民點様襲撃漢人商店！晩晩播藏民點様掟石襲撃瑟縮於一角解放軍！晩晩播被襲撃漢人訪問！但無一幅畫面見到 ...

我覺得很奇怪，這位先生咁憎共匪，點會晚晚睇中央台，但佢又好似現場一樣咁清楚。

其實大陸拍攝也好，外國遊客拍懾也好，佢都話人地老作，淨係識得由自己憑空想像出來的才是最真，
唔怪得講來講去都係得你「一枝公」，無人來幫你拖。

[ 本帖最後由 理魯竇 於 2008-3-25 00:49 編輯 ]

講得中共咁光明磊落, 點解中共要攞走咗記者o的 記憶卡, 磁帶, 洗走電腦檔, 重要送走佢地呢..

[ 本帖最後由 Rubber 於 2008-3-25 10:17 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 理魯竇 於 2008-3-24 16:21 發表


我覺得很奇怪，這位先生咁憎共匪，點會晚晚睇中央台，但佢又好似現場一樣咁清楚。

其實大陸拍攝也好，外國遊客拍懾也好，佢都話人地老作，淨係識得由自己憑空想像出來的才是最真，
唔怪得講來講去都係得你 ...

只有一個解釋——>犯賤。

引用:

原帖由 Rubber 於 2008-3-25 07:32 發表
講得中共咁光明磊落, 點解中共要攞走咗記者o的 記憶卡, 磁帶, 洗走電腦檔, 重要送走佢地呢..

就係唔俾記者剪裁報道.民主國家所謂的新聞自由原來係指新聞剪裁報道的自由.CNN最佳例子.

引用:

原帖由 ngtungsee 於 2008-3-25 11:24 發表


就係唔俾記者剪裁報道.民主國家所謂的新聞自由原來係指新聞剪裁報道的自由.CNN最佳例子.

如果對記者改更為開放,不是更好 ?  因為不所有記者將是一個偏心的方式報道,  和通訊社將互相監測.

引用:

原帖由 熙官 於 2008-3-25 00:03 發表
話人垃圾? 你都幾幽默.... 你估多人識傅國湧定李敖呢?

老中青邏輯 -> 國民黨VS共產黨 , 李敖鬧國民黨 = 共產黨 / 投共
中共擁有西藏主權, 同意西藏主權歸中國/中共 = 共產黨/ 投共

李敖數十年如一日
鬧國民黨鬧到坐監
據佢自己話李敖禁書數量為中華民國之冠
香港有邊個口水反共 " 勇士 " 要坐監, 被禁出書 ?

" 開放 " 呢亭跟大紀元同類
獨沽一味投恐共老中青口味去用口水反共
閉門造車, 逢中必反
共產黨話太陽由東邊 昇起, 佢地就話由係西邊昇起
只要���酯輕鉹f水亂噴, 老作亂吹也不愁被中共告誹謗
更不愁被禁, 不愁會坐監  

零風險, 無本生利

引用:

原帖由 熙官 於 2008-3-25 13:17 發表
令我諗起夜晚係旺角西洋菜街"天滅中共"果d 攤位 ....

所以咪話呢種係死淨把口, 冇膽又冇腦愚昧落後拜神婆一族
唔通孫中山當年會用呢種口號 " 天滅清帝 "
而抗日戰爭就話 " 天滅日皇 " , 盟軍就高喊 " 天滅希特拉 " ...

支持美國放屁,啲屁好香呀!
布殊萬歲,萬歲,萬萬歲歲!

布殊快啲出兵西藏,把所有共匪,漢賊,藏奸,港燦趕出西藏....

西藏萬歲,萬歲,萬萬歲歲!
布殊萬歲,萬歲,萬萬歲歲!
美國萬歲,萬歲,萬萬歲歲!

大紀元呢 d 報章，直頭斷章取義，誇大其詞，想象力和創意達到大師級水平。

引用:

原帖由 熙官 於 2008-3-25 05:17 發表
令我諗起夜晚係旺角西洋菜街"天滅中共"果d 攤位 ....

最衰仲係銅鑼環 Sogo 對開個攤位,分分鐘有個蓋白布嘅假死人,除時真係嚇死人。

人格及誠信有問題既人都有粉絲！

古者言之不出, 恥躬之不逮

昨日無線新聞話德國電視台澄清及道歉 " 將尼泊爾當做拉薩 "
唔知老中青有冇睇到 ?

引用:

原帖由 一枝公 於 2008-3-25 21:11 發表
人格及誠信有問題既人都有粉絲！

當然有 - 陳死扁

中國网民近日鋪天蓋地譴責CNN裁剪一幅拉薩暴乱照片作不實及有選擇性報導, 究竟有幾多中國人看過這篇報導呢 ? CNN作去解釋, 問题圖片被截成两幅, 乃因编幅所限, 事實上, 两截照片都被例在照片欄(Photo gallery)內, 供大眾参閱. 照片標題亦用上"Tibetans throw stones at army vehicles on a street in the capital Lhasa." , 我譯為"西藏人在首府拉薩向軍車拋撙石头", 如此報導, 失實之處從何說起.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/03/28/tibet.statement/index.html

>>>> 圖片被截成�帤T, 乃因编幅所限

連 CNN 自己都招架唔住
咁好笑�屩リf都有人當真  
一句講哂 : 護主心切  

中國有幾多網民睇過 ?
一億網民中有百份一睇過都 成百萬人
未計海外留學生
有 d 上世紀中古人頭腦未跟得上時代步伐
所以唔知今日互聯網年代資訊傳遞速度
中古人仲以為今日大陸仲用緊飛鴿傳書

死唔認錯耶！

updated 3:23 p.m. EDT, Fri March 28, 2008

CNN statement on Tibet coverageStory Highlights

CNN issues response to criticism of Tibet coverage

     
(CNN) -- CNN has been singled out for criticism for our coverage of events in Tibet through an anti-CNN.com Web site and elsewhere. We have provided comprehensive coverage of all sides of this story, but two specific allegations relate to pro-Tibetan bias. We would like to take this chance to respond to them:

Allegation 1: CNN intentionally cropped an image in order to remove Tibetan protesters throwing stones at Chinese trucks.

CNN refutes all allegations by bloggers that it distorts its coverage of the events in Tibet to portray either side in a more favorable light. We have consistently and repeatedly shown all sides of this story. The one image in question was used wholly appropriately in the specific editorial context and there could be no confusion regarding what it was showing, not least because it was captioned: "Tibetans throw stones at army vehicles on a street in the capital Lhasa." The picture gallery included in Tibet stories includes the image. (See the gallery)

We have also published images showing violence by Tibetans against the Chinese. A March 18 story shows Tibetan youths attacking a Chinese man. (Read the story)

Additionally, we have published video from the Chinese media apparently showing Tibetans attacking Chinese interests in Lhasa.  (Watch the video) »

Allegation 2: CNN referred to Tibet as a "country."

CNN's policy is to refer to Tibet as "Tibet Autonomous Region of China." In our dozens of stories on the topic to date, we are aware of only two instances where it was incorrectly referenced as a country.

CNN's reputation is based on reporting global news accurately and impartially, while our coverage through the use of words, images or video always reflects a wide range of opinions and points of view on every story.