this is already a culture in other competitors's websites that mentioning is not so good.  

personal attack: not equal to critiziing somebody's wrong doing.

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ brasco ©ó 2007-7-4 16:09 µoªí

¦ý§Ú¥ç¨£­ø¨ì§A¹ï¤j®aûHcomplaint§@¹L¥ô¦ó¿n·¥¦P¦³«Ø³]©ÊûH¦^À³,
¤Ï¤§ÀsÃC¤@®¤, ±þµL³j!!

PM me for your suggestions.  Elaborate your thinking.

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ xocatII ©ó 2007-7-4 15:57 µoªí
if you're batman, what will you do?
Tell me here or preferably through PM.

See above for my observations in brief.  Will elaborate later - here and (only if necessary) through PM.

I also whole-heartedly encourage others to join this discussion.  And let us concentrate on our vision of the future, if only because we all know too well that memories of our recent past could hold us back forever.

Questions:

1. If members appeal against your decision, how did they intend to appeal the verdict??

2. Will you be tended to subjective by receiving PART of members' private mail before KILLING??

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ loksiu ©ó 2007-7-4 16:15 µoªí

allure, apeapeape, mtr, dizzc..... µ¥³£´¿¤½¶}©Î¥Hpm§Î¦¡§@¥X¸ß°Ý, ¦ý§¹¥þ¨S¦³¥ô¦ó¦^À³.

That's something you said without evidence support.  I reply every PM.

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ ©}¦Ú¤ó ©ó 2007-7-4 16:15 µoªí
Questions:
1. If members appeal against your decision, how did they intend to appeal the verdict??
2. Will you be tended to subjective by receiving PART of members' private mail before KILLING??

·f ¥y ¼L ¡J

§Ú ¦a ¤j ®a ³£ ª¾ ¹D ¡A ¥ç ±µ ¨ü ¡A ºÞ ²z ¼h ¦³ µ´ ¹ï Åv ¤O ¡C

§Ú ¯u ¤ß ¬Û «H ½¿ ½» «L ¦³ ¸Û ·N ¥h ºÉ ¶q ¾A ·í ¦a ¹B ¥Î ©O ­Ó Åv ¤O ¡A ³Ì ¤j §½ ­­ «Y ÉN ¤H ¾Ö ¦³ ©Ò ¦³ information ¡A ©Ò ¥H ­ø ¥i ¯à ©Ò ¦³ ¨M ©w ³£ §¹ ¬ü ¡C

©Ò ¥H °Ý ÃD ¥i ¯à «Y ¡J ÂI ¼Ë ¥O ³Ì ·Ç ½T o¬J information ¦³ ¾A ·í o¬J ´ë ¹D ¨ì ¹F ¦³ Åv ¤O ¡] and therefore ¸q °È ¡^ o¬J ¦³ Ãö ¤H µ¥ ¤â ¤W ¡C

¡u ¦³ Åv ¤O ¡] and therefore ¸q °È ¡^ o¬J ¦³ Ãö ¤H µ¥ ¡v o¬J ¸Û ·N ¡B ¤½ «H ¤O ¡A §O ¬° ¤@ °Ý ÃD ¡A ¥i ¥H ¤À ¶} °Q ½× ¡C

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ ©}¦Ú¤ó ©ó 2007-7-4 16:15 µoªí
Questions:

1. If members appeal against your decision, how did they intend to appeal the verdict??

2. Will you be tended to subjective by receiving PART of members' private mail before KILLING??

1. I've modified my rules/definition of personal attack.  So, over 92.3% of my banning is ok.  
They can just email me or login as a new member if they insist for not banning.  Very easy.  

2. I repeat, personal attack is defined quite well in my post.  Pls read it.  If you want to modify the definition, PM me.  So, it won't be subjective.  

©O«×­ø«Yªk®x¡A­ø»Ý­nÃÒ¾Ú¡A§Ú¹ï²´´N«YÃÒ¾Ú! (Á¿¯º©Q, ¨ä¹ê¡A¤j®aªº²´´N«}«Y evidence °Õ)

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ coolmale9394 ©ó 2007-7-4 16:24 µoªí

·f ¥y ¼L ¡J

§Ú ¦a ¤j ®a ³£ ª¾ ¹D ¡A ¥ç ±µ ¨ü ¡A ºÞ ²z ¼h ¦³ µ´ ¹ï Åv ¤O ¡C

§Ú ¯u ¤ß ¬Û «H ½¿ ½» «L ¦³ ¸Û ·N ¥h ºÉ ¶q ¾A ·í ¦a ¹B ¥Î ©O ­Ó Åv ¤O ¡A ³Ì ¤j §½ ­­ «Y ÉN ¤H ¾Ö ¦³ ©Ò ¦³ information ¡A ©Ò ¥H ­ø ¥i ¯à ©Ò ¦³ ¨M ©w ³£ §¹ ¬ü ¡C

©Ò ¥H °Ý ÃD ¥i ¯à «Y ¡J ÂI ¼Ë ¥O ³Ì ·Ç ½T o¬J information ¦³ ¾A ·í o¬J ´ë ¹D ¨ì ¹F ¦³ Åv ¤O ¡] and therefore ¸q °È ¡^ o¬J ¦³ Ãö ¤H µ¥ ¤â ¤W ¡C

¡u ¦³ Åv ¤O ¡] and therefore ¸q °È ¡^ o¬J ¦³ Ãö ¤H µ¥ ¡v o¬J ¸Û ·N ¡B ¤½ «H ¤O ¡A §O ¬° ¤@ °Ý ÃD ¡A ¥i ¥H ¤À ¶} °Q ½× ¡C  

§Ú»{¦P§Aªº¬Ýªk, ¦ý§PÂ_¹Lµ{Ãø§K¨ü¨ì¤zÂZ, ©Ò¥H¤~¥X²{¥H©¹¡u«D¥¿¦¡ ¡v¤W¶D¾÷¨î
¬°§K¸Ó¡u¦³Åv¤O¡] and therefore ¸q°È¡^¬J¦³Ãö¤Hµ¥¡v§PÂ_¿ù»~©Î»~¥Î¾Åv, ¾A·í´ë¹D¥²¶·¤Î¦­­q¥ß

I can honestly say this...there are many occasions where I didnt get any reply at all.

So..I dont think XOCAT II has the time nor the energy to reply to our PMs

Also..what is the need to setting reading rights to 255? Pls explain?