請各位在和平氣氛下討論

任何人等，會員之間人身攻擊，對人不對事，殺無赦！
If you want to critize, focus on the stuff/things done instead of personal attack.
留意：此 ban 人 function 只限 xocat II 履執行.  有問題，請舉報。

It is quite easy and should be commonly agreed for personal attack among users.  

Of course, we might attack somebody if he has done something wrong, but pls say what he has done wrong instead of attacking him/her.

personal attack: not equal to criticizing somebody's wrong doing.  

Therefore, it is 100% ok to mention what others' have done wrong.  However, if you just personal attack someone without mentioning the stuff he/she has done.  You're "die hard".  

我們支持言論自由。

e.g. ABC is careless -> that's personal attack.
ABC is so careless that he put his cat into the fridge.  (with evidence support).  -> That's NOT personal attack.

引用:

原帖由 messenger 於 2007-7-4 14:11 發表


我又想問: 人身攻擊 Personal Attack 即 ban

是否任何版主都可即 ban人身攻擊別人者?

Only xocatII can ban personal attack users.

引用:

原帖由 色即是空 於 2007-7-4 15:01 發表


上forum 吹下水都有文字獄:sleeping:我仲以為呢d 野只係響清朝同文化大革命o個陣先有o既添:L:L

only personal attack without strong evidence to support claims.  In Chinese, 對人不對事者。

引用:

原帖由 coolmale9394 於 2007-7-4 15:34 發表

今 朝 o係 第 度 有 兄 弟 話 NC 版 版 主 空 缺 ， 先 返 來 睇 睇 ， 原 來 咁 L 大 鑊 ....

問 番 自 己 ， 假 如 早 o的 知 道 ， 會 唔 會 搭 嘴 呢 ？ 諗 兩 諗 應 該 唔 會 。 其 實 每 日 都 會  ...

if you're batman, what will you do?
Tell me here or preferably through PM.

引用:

原帖由 sausau 於 2007-7-4 15:52 發表
哈！乜野叫做  Personal Attack  呀？定義呢？唔多明？

你先要定立一套清楚合理規例先可以用  ( Personal Attack  ) 呢個字眼！


Forum  <===========  中文叫做 ( 論壇 ) ，想你會知，對嗎！


由你 ...

It is quite easy and should be commonly agreed for personal attack among users.  

Of course, we might attack somebody if he has done something wrong, but pls say what he has done wrong instead of attack him/her.

對人不對事者，殺。

this is already a culture in other competitors's websites that mentioning is not so good.  

personal attack: not equal to critiziing somebody's wrong doing.

引用:

原帖由 brasco 於 2007-7-4 16:09 發表

但我亦見唔到你對大家�騃omplaint作過任何積極同有建設性�鵀^應,
反之龍顏一恕, 殺無赦!!

PM me for your suggestions.  Elaborate your thinking.

引用:

原帖由 loksiu 於 2007-7-4 16:15 發表

allure, apeapeape, mtr, dizzc..... 等都曾公開或以pm形式作出詢問, 但完全沒有任何回應.

That's something you said without evidence support.  I reply every PM.

引用:

原帖由 屈臣氏 於 2007-7-4 16:15 發表
Questions:

1. If members appeal against your decision, how did they intend to appeal the verdict??

2. Will you be tended to subjective by receiving PART of members' private mail before KILLING??

1. I've modified my rules/definition of personal attack.  So, over 92.3% of my banning is ok.  
They can just email me or login as a new member if they insist for not banning.  Very easy.  

2. I repeat, personal attack is defined quite well in my post.  Pls read it.  If you want to modify the definition, PM me.  So, it won't be subjective.  

呢度唔係法庭，唔需要證據，我對眼就係證據! (講笑咋, 其實，大家的眼就咪係 evidence 啦)