引用:

原帖由 giovanni 於 2007-12-26 09:21 發表
世叔伯教落，財不可露眼。

上親大陸記得用部最cheap既手機，<$1500就ok啦，連囡囡都看不上眼o個種，不見了也不會肉赤嘛！

larusso師兄既遭遇我都心表同情,我上大陸都係用舊手機,連收機佬都唔收果隻!

引用:

原帖由 parleur 於 2007-12-27 00:41 發表
last time a KTV girl stole my friend's phone and the security people nearly beated the girl to death in front of us, we had to ask them to stop

Wow, so brutal!

引用:

原帖由 天使之施 於 2007-12-23 19:00 發表
一般女女吾會咁做,我都去過呢個場,我走時女女都會提我攞齊野走,可能係酒店清潔員都吾定,你哋離開房間,第一個會入去就係酒店清潔員,桑拿場員工吾敢咁做,會驚人講影響生意。

年尾大家都好等錢用！
錢財不可露眼，好一個教訓！

引用:

原帖由 yankumi 於 2007-12-30 00:07 發表


你太睇得起d囡囡同服務員工了

我都係咁話. 因為我諗. 愈似係個妹妹手多做左野. 因為我平時真係好注意我的電話.
但個日. 就不停咁比佢轉移我視線... 到走之後才發覺,

都係個一句. 如果唔係我入左笠, 落左樓... 佢地根本係無機會講得通.
現在就一口咬定我係街比人偷左唔知... 客位大佬. 我淩晨四點幾五點落樓.
樓下鬼影都無一隻. 燒烤檔, 車仔檔都收晒啦. 鬼影都無隻. 鬼偷咩?

我好肯定我落時, 部機已經唔係我身上.

引用:

原帖由 Haidada 於 2007-12-27 17:05 發表
你的雙卡是否同時待機的呢﹐ 還是只能選一張卡待機﹖﹖

係 "双卡双待"............. 十分方便和好用!

引用:

原帖由 def_lo 於 2007-12-27 16:59 發表


吓, 咁平! 係甚麼牌子? 平時睇嗰啲要接近$1000呀!!

不知名的國產機......... 沒有 bluetooth........ 原來价錢是 $680............. 鴨亍貨， 但很好用！

引用:

原帖由 larusso 於 2007-12-24 20:11 發表
都只係叫大家小心為上... 總之. 臨出門口前. CHECK 清楚晒自己 D 野. 免得好似我咁. 比人有位入,.

絕對同意, 出來蒲, 一字記之曰"慎"! 一要小心唔好LAI嘢, 又要唔好HIGH嘢比至愛親朋知道!!!!!!!!!

引用:

原帖由 def_lo 於 2007-12-31 10:39 發表


絕對同意, 出來蒲, 一字記之曰"慎"! 一要小心唔好LAI嘢, 又要唔好HIGH嘢比至愛親朋知道!!!!!!!!!

What is the major difference between HIGH and LAI?

引用:

原帖由 icheng609 於 2007-12-31 10:43 發表

What is the major difference between HIGH and LAI?

都係動詞一個! 執筆之時嘅用意差唔多, 不過行文之時唔想用相同詞而已!!

引用:

原帖由 KMY89 於 2007-12-25 00:09 發表
其實可以報警 wor ...  

kmy89 兄報警 會吾見重多同15days
你應該會明,right!

引用:

原帖由 fengliu 於 2007-12-31 19:52 發表


kmy89 兄報警 會吾見重多同15days
你應該會明,right!

我當時只係好無奈. 因為我明知係佢地有人食左我部機.

最唔順係 LISA 之係的回應. 我情願佢老實 D 話好難幫到我算數.

引用:

原帖由 larusso 於 2007-12-31 23:34 發表
我當時只係好無奈. 因為我明知係佢地有人食左我部機.
最唔順係 LISA 之係的回應. 我情願佢老實 D 話好難幫到我算數.

On paper, Lisa is not as honest as Ms. Sung.

引用:

原帖由 larusso 於 2007-12-24 01:15 發表
後加... 最唔高興係. 話個經理係老闆細佬. 個服務員係老闆個侄. 兩個人說話一定可信. 絕無問題.

如果咁講, 就係個囡囡偷啦! 又或者我蠢. 係老闆邊個邊個又點. 難度一定擔屎不偷吃嗎? 大大部新電話. 邊個拾到都 ...

如果吾系自己主埸都系小心为妙..同手机超渡吧!!!!希望它买得好價啦
師兄当破財挡災吧!!!!

I had a similar experience but with fast food.  This is totally my mistake and I deserve it.  It happened when I started to go to fast food (too trusting and no experience) 4 years back.  I left my wallet in my pant's pocket when I went to shower with 囡囡.  After finish and 搭左電梯落左樓 then I checked my wallet, 200 RMB missing.  I am really sure it was done by other 囡囡 sitting in the living room since GT will not risk losing business.  I do not go back to the same fast food place anymore.

我都 BLACK LIST 了. 話過唔再去呢道. 好似 PEN 兄所說.

LISA 係一個唔老實的人. 所以我話情願佢唔講個番說話重好. 講講得多我愈唔 LIKE.

上面位師兄又係咁. 如果當時未踏出間店. 我估有得追.... ...唉...

引用:

原帖由 larusso 於 2008-1-4 00:06 發表
我都 BLACK LIST 了. 話過唔再去呢道. 好似 PEN 兄所說.

LISA 係一個唔老實的人. 所以我話情願佢唔講個番說話重好. 講講得多我愈唔 LIKE.

上面位師兄又係咁. 如果當時未踏出間店. 我估有得追.... ...唉...

事己到此............... 唉! 不過， Sung 仍是可靠的， 因噎廢食太不值得了！

be careful next time. don't let it happen again

引用:

原帖由 icheng609 於 2008-1-4 08:20 發表
事己到此............... 唉! 不過， Sung 仍是可靠的， 因噎廢食太不值得了！

I agree completely. Thanks.

Stories are normally two sided. It is not fair to HL if we condemn it without finding out the truth.

引用:

原帖由 icheng609 於 2008-1-7 09:01 發表
Stories are normally two sided. It is not fair to HL if we condemn it without finding out the truth.

I know you have but not convenient to disclose here.

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2008-1-7 21:13 發表

I know you have but not convenient to disclose here.

Of course I won't.............. as I am not the insider and unable to get the truth!

引用:

原帖由 icheng609 於 2008-1-8 11:28 發表
Of course I won't.............. as I am not the insider and unable to get the truth!

But you kind of know the full story.

引用:

原帖由 peninsula 於 2008-1-8 21:41 發表

But you kind of know the full story.

Not exactly........... I am just a listener of the story on both sides........... but nor smart enough (and not intend to, of course) to dig out the truth.

then you can be an accurate reporter to report both sides of the story, and let the listener to decide.

引用:

原帖由 def_lo 於 2008-1-9 08:53 發表
then you can be an accurate reporter to report both sides of the story, and let the listener to decide.

I am not a good reporter nor a good story teller.........

All I can be sure is that:

1. duckie (^*) was not the accused.

2. *% was the girl providing the service, but definitely she is not a greedy girl and would not commit theft.

3. the lost cell phone was not a new model.